These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30915587)

  • 1. Compensation and Amplification of Attenuation Bias in Causal Effect Estimates.
    Sengewald MA; Pohl S
    Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):589-610. PubMed ID: 30915587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When does measurement error in covariates impact causal effect estimates? Analytic derivations of different scenarios and an empirical illustration.
    Sengewald MA; Steiner PM; Pohl S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 May; 72(2):244-270. PubMed ID: 30345554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Propensity Score-Based Estimators With Multiple Error-Prone Covariates.
    Hong H; Aaby DA; Siddique J; Stuart EA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 188(1):222-230. PubMed ID: 30358801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applied comparison of large-scale propensity score matching and cardinality matching for causal inference in observational research.
    Fortin SP; Johnston SS; Schuemie MJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):109. PubMed ID: 34030640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with fallible covariates.
    Culpepper SA; Aguinis H
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 21517178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Power, selection bias and predictive performance of the Population Pharmacokinetic Covariate Model.
    Ribbing J; Jonsson EN
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2004 Apr; 31(2):109-34. PubMed ID: 15379381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying the bias due to observed individual confounders in causal treatment effect estimates.
    Parast L; Griffin BA
    Stat Med; 2020 Aug; 39(18):2447-2476. PubMed ID: 32388870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adjustment for regression dilution in epidemiological regression analyses.
    Knuiman MW; Divitini ML; Buzas JS; Fitzgerald PE
    Ann Epidemiol; 1998 Jan; 8(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 9465995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clarifying selection bias in cluster randomized trials.
    Li F; Tian Z; Bobb J; Papadogeorgou G; Li F
    Clin Trials; 2022 Feb; 19(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 34894795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Causal Selection of Covariates in Regression Calibration for Mismeasured Continuous Exposure.
    Tang W; Spiegelman D; Liao X; Wang M
    Epidemiology; 2024 May; 35(3):320-328. PubMed ID: 38630507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of case-control data with covariate measurement error: application to diet and colon cancer.
    Armstrong BG; Whittemore AS; Howe GR
    Stat Med; 1989 Sep; 8(9):1151-63; discussion 1165-6. PubMed ID: 2799135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An imputation-based solution to using mismeasured covariates in propensity score analysis.
    Webb-Vargas Y; Rudolph KE; Lenis D; Murakami P; Stuart EA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1824-1837. PubMed ID: 26037527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Covariate measurement error and the estimation of random effect parameters in a mixed model for longitudinal data.
    Tosteson TD; Buonaccorsi JP; Demidenko E
    Stat Med; 1998 Sep; 17(17):1959-71. PubMed ID: 9777689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies.
    Steiner PM; Cook TD; Shadish WR; Clark MH
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):250-67. PubMed ID: 20822251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of misclassification on covariate-adaptive randomized clinical trials.
    Wang T; Ma W
    Biometrics; 2021 Jun; 77(2):451-464. PubMed ID: 32453885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Omitting Non-confounding Predictors From General Relative-Risk Models for Binary Outcomes.
    Cologne J; Furukawa K; Grant EJ; Abbott RD
    J Epidemiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):116-122. PubMed ID: 30101814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design of pharmacokinetic studies for latent covariates.
    Lagishetty CV; Coulter CV; Duffull SB
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2012 Feb; 39(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 22161222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accounting for covariate measurement error in a Cox model analysis of recurrence of depression.
    Liu K; Mazumdar S; Stone RA; Dew MA; Houck PR; Reynolds CF
    J Psychiatr Res; 2001; 35(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11461714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A review of covariate selection for non-experimental comparative effectiveness research.
    Sauer BC; Brookhart MA; Roy J; VanderWeele T
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2013 Nov; 22(11):1139-45. PubMed ID: 24006330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Covariate balance for no confounding in the sufficient-cause model.
    Suzuki E; Tsuda T; Yamamoto E
    Ann Epidemiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):48-53.e2. PubMed ID: 29241736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.