These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30916036)

  • 1. Reproducibility of search strategies of non-Cochrane systematic reviews published in anaesthesiology journals is suboptimal: primary methodological study.
    Biocic M; Fidahic M; Puljak L
    Br J Anaesth; 2019 Jun; 122(6):e79-e81. PubMed ID: 30916036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical trial registry use in anaesthesiology systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study of systematic reviews published in anaesthesiology journals and the Cochrane Library.
    Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Sims MT; Vassar M
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Dec; 34(12):797-807. PubMed ID: 28731924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008.
    MacDonald SL; Canfield SE; Fesperman SF; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):648-53. PubMed ID: 20639030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An analysis of review articles published in four anaesthesia journals.
    Smith AF
    Can J Anaesth; 1997 Apr; 44(4):405-9. PubMed ID: 9104524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reporting and Methodology of Multivariable Analyses in Prognostic Observational Studies Published in 4 Anesthesiology Journals: A Methodological Descriptive Review.
    Guglielminotti J; Dechartres A; Mentré F; Montravers P; Longrois D; Laouénan C
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Oct; 121(4):1011-1029. PubMed ID: 25390276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals.
    Faggion CM; Bakas NP; Wasiak J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):176. PubMed ID: 29281975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer.
    Goldkuhle M; Narayan VM; Weigl A; Dahm P; Skoetz N
    BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020869. PubMed ID: 29581210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm?
    Fleming PS; Seehra J; Polychronopoulou A; Fedorowicz Z; Pandis N
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Apr; 35(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 22510325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conflicts of interest: are they a problem for anaesthesia journals? What should we do about them?
    Sneyd JR
    Br J Anaesth; 2000 Dec; 85(6):811-4. PubMed ID: 11732510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Errors in anaesthesia.
    Chethan DB; Adekanye O
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Jul; 62(7):753, author reply 753. PubMed ID: 17567369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of acupuncture interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Ma B; Qi GQ; Lin XT; Wang T; Chen ZM; Yang KH
    J Altern Complement Med; 2012 Sep; 18(9):813-7. PubMed ID: 22924413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The anaesthetist and the environment.
    Coe AJ
    Anaesthesia; 2010 Sep; 65(9):954-5; discussion 955. PubMed ID: 21198490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster.
    Sampson M; Shojania KG; Garritty C; Horsley T; Ocampo M; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):531-6. PubMed ID: 18471656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk of bias and methodological appraisal practices in systematic reviews published in anaesthetic journals: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen LE; Umberham BA; Hedin RJ; Vassar BM
    Anaesthesia; 2016 Aug; 71(8):955-68. PubMed ID: 27396249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The fragility of statistically significant findings in randomised controlled anaesthesiology trials: systematic review of the medical literature.
    Mazzinari G; Ball L; Serpa Neto A; Errando CL; Dondorp AM; Bos LD; Gama de Abreu M; Pelosi P; Schultz MJ
    Br J Anaesth; 2018 May; 120(5):935-941. PubMed ID: 29661411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Zhang J; Wang J; Han L; Zhang F; Cao J; Ma Y
    Nurs Outlook; 2015; 63(4):446-455.e4. PubMed ID: 26187084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality Assessment of Meta-analyses Published in Leading Anesthesiology Journals From 2005 to 2014.
    Hall AM; Lee S; Zurakowski D
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Jun; 124(6):2063-2067. PubMed ID: 28448399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Registered and Reported Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials Published in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Jones PM; Chow JTY; Arango MF; Fridfinnson JA; Gai N; Lam K; Turkstra TP
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1292-1300. PubMed ID: 28704247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology.
    Collier A; Heilig L; Schilling L; Williams H; Dellavalle RP
    Br J Dermatol; 2006 Dec; 155(6):1230-5. PubMed ID: 17107394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.