These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30916440)

  • 21. Not asking cancer patients about their preferences does make a difference. A cross-sectional study examining cancer patients' preferred and perceived role in decision-making regarding their last important cancer treatment.
    Herrmann A; Hall A; Sanson-Fisher R; Zdenkowski N; Watson R; Turon H
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2018 Sep; 27(5):e12871. PubMed ID: 29900611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Shared decision making: A dual-layer model to tackling multimorbidity in primary care.
    Ng CJ; Lee YK; Abdullah A; Abu Bakar AI; Tun Firzara AM; Tiew HW
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Dec; 25(6):1074-1079. PubMed ID: 31099120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patient Preferences Regarding Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Findings From a Multisite Survey.
    Schoenfeld EM; Kanzaria HK; Quigley DD; Marie PS; Nayyar N; Sabbagh SH; Gress KL; Probst MA
    Acad Emerg Med; 2018 Oct; 25(10):1118-1128. PubMed ID: 29897639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Shared decision making: an approach to strengthening patient participation in rehabilitation].
    Faller H
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2003 Jun; 42(3):129-35. PubMed ID: 12813649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Momentum trial: the efficacy of using a smartphone application to promote patient activation and support shared decision making in people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia in outpatient treatment settings: a randomized controlled single-blind trial.
    Vitger T; Austin SF; Petersen L; Tønder ES; Nordentoft M; Korsbek L
    BMC Psychiatry; 2019 Jun; 19(1):185. PubMed ID: 31208376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perceived involvement and preferences in shared decision-making among patients with hypertension.
    Mah HC; Muthupalaniappen L; Chong WW
    Fam Pract; 2016 Jun; 33(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 26993483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Shared Decision Making: From Decision Science to Data Science.
    Shaoibi A; Neelon B; Lenert LA
    Med Decis Making; 2020 Apr; 40(3):254-265. PubMed ID: 32024424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Patients' perspectives on person-centred participation in healthcare: a framework analysis.
    Thórarinsdóttir K; Kristjánsson K
    Nurs Ethics; 2014 Mar; 21(2):129-47. PubMed ID: 23812560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29.
    Armstrong KA; Metlay JP
    Ann Intern Med; 2020 May; 172(10):688-692. PubMed ID: 32311739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patients' perspectives on care pathways and informed shared decision making in the transition between psychiatric hospitalization and the community.
    Sather EW; Iversen VC; Svindseth MF; Crawford P; Vasset F
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Dec; 25(6):1131-1141. PubMed ID: 31144419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.
    Loh A; Simon D; Wills CE; Kriston L; Niebling W; Härter M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Aug; 67(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 17509808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Medication and participation: A qualitative study of patient experiences with antipsychotic drugs.
    Lorem GF; Frafjord JS; Steffensen M; Wang CE
    Nurs Ethics; 2014 May; 21(3):347-58. PubMed ID: 24106257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [What place for shared decision making in internal medicine practice?].
    Durieu I; Reynaud Q; Moumjid N
    Rev Med Interne; 2019 Jul; 40(7):417-418. PubMed ID: 30348465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A book to fix the gap between theory and reality in shared decision making.
    Hanoch Y
    BMJ; 2021 Nov; 375():n2672. PubMed ID: 34732394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Patients' perspective in the surgical decision-making process.
    Lim E
    Thorac Surg Clin; 2012 Nov; 22(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 23084617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Treatment decisions for breast carcinoma: patient preferences and physician perceptions.
    Bruera E; Willey JS; Palmer JL; Rosales M
    Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(7):2076-80. PubMed ID: 11932912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patient Self-Management and Tracking: A European Experience.
    van Riel PLCM; Zuidema RM; Vogel C; Rongen-van Dartel SAA
    Rheum Dis Clin North Am; 2019 May; 45(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 30952392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. When do cancer patients regret their treatment decision? A path analysis of the influence of clinicians' communication styles and the match of decision-making styles on decision regret.
    Nicolai J; Buchholz A; Seefried N; Reuter K; Härter M; Eich W; Bieber C
    Patient Educ Couns; 2016 May; 99(5):739-46. PubMed ID: 26658703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding Antiretroviral Treatment Preferences: What Do Patients Really Want?
    Yelverton V; Ostermann J; Hobbie A; Madut D; Thielman N
    AIDS Patient Care STDS; 2018 Sep; 32(9):340-348. PubMed ID: 30179532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The relative importance of patients' decisional control preferences and experiences.
    Ghane A; Huynh HP; Andrews SE; Legg AM; Tabuenca A; Sweeny K
    Psychol Health; 2014; 29(10):1105-18. PubMed ID: 24724728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.