These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30916773)

  • 41. Comparative means of dose reduction in dental radiography.
    Rohlin M; White SC
    Curr Opin Dent; 1992 Jun; 2():1-9. PubMed ID: 1520917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of a photostimulable phosphor system with film for dental radiology.
    Huda W; Rill LN; Benn DK; Pettigrew JC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Jun; 83(6):725-31. PubMed ID: 9195631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A comparison of the response of storage phosphor and film radiography to small variations in X-ray exposure.
    Hildebolt CF; Fletcher G; Yokoyama-Crothers N; Conover GL; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9442600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The reduction of x-ray exposure in dental practice using rare-earth screen--fast film combinations.
    Greig DG
    Br Dent J; 1983 Jul; 155(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 6577879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Conventional dental radiography and future prospectives].
    Youssefzadeh S; Gahleitner A; Bernhart D; Bernhart T
    Radiologe; 1999 Dec; 39(12):1018-26. PubMed ID: 10643025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A laboratory comparison of three imaging systems for image quality and radiation exposure characteristics.
    Bhaskaran V; Qualtrough AJ; Rushton VE; Worthington HV; Horner K
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 16104978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
    Doyle P; Finney L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The dose received by patients during dental X-ray examination and the technical condition of radiological equipment.
    Bekas M; Pachocki KA
    Med Pr; 2013; 64(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 24645561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Provision of radiographic services: a self-assessment exercise for dental team members.
    Lundeen RC; Gratt BM; Katz JO; Tyndall DA; Brand JW; Pettigrew JC; Thunthy KH; Goren AD
    Gen Dent; 1993; 41(2):144-7. PubMed ID: 8330730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparative evaluation of the sensitometric properties of screen-film systems and conventional dental receptors for intraoral radiography.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 2594331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Image quality of a portable X-ray device (Nomad Pro 2) compared to a wall-mounted device in intraoral radiography.
    Nitschke J; Schorn L; Holtmann H; Zeller U; Handschel J; Sonntag D; Lommen J
    Oral Radiol; 2021 Apr; 37(2):224-230. PubMed ID: 32232719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Influence of tube potential setting and dose on the visibility of lesions in intraoral radiography.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Feb; 36(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 17403883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Radiation protection in dental X-ray surgeries--still rooms for improvement.
    Hart G; Dugdale M
    Br Dent J; 2013 Mar; 214(6):E16. PubMed ID: 23519002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Sensitometric comparison of direct- and indirect-exposure films used in intraoral radiography.
    Hashimoto K; Thunthy KH; Iwai K; Ejima K; Weinberg R
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1992 Jun; 34(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 1500950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Intraoral digital radiography.
    Alder ME
    Tex Dent J; 1995 Feb; 112(2):31-5. PubMed ID: 8633303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Dental radiology: what you need to know when taking radiographs in the oral cavity.
    Schiff T
    Dent Today; 2007 Jun; 26(6):104-5. PubMed ID: 17601121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A quantitative analysis of dental radiography quality assurance practices among North Carolina dentists.
    Platin E; Janhom A; Tyndall D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jul; 86(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 9690256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
    Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
    Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Radiation dosage reduction in general dental practice using digital intraoral radiographic systems.
    Hayakawa Y; Shibuya H; Ota Y; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1997 Feb; 38(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9566150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Quality assurance in digital dental radiography--justification and dose reduction in dental and maxillofacial radiology.
    Hellstern F; Geibel MA
    Int J Comput Dent; 2012; 15(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 22930946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.