These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30917720)

  • 21. Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with mode of delivery in sickle cell disease.
    Martinborough T; Allen-Davis W; Hunter-Greaves T; Thame M; Reid M; Simms-Stewart D
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Nov; 42(8):3560-3567. PubMed ID: 36541410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Head pushing versus reverse breech extraction in cases of impacted fetal head during Cesarean section.
    Levy R; Chernomoretz T; Appelman Z; Levin D; Or Y; Hagay ZJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jul; 121(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 15961214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cephalic extraction versus breech extraction in second-stage caesarean section: a retrospective study.
    Ezra O; Lahav-Ezra H; Meyer R; Cahan T; Ilan H; Mazaki-Tovi S; Sivan E; Barzilay E; Haas J
    BJOG; 2020 Nov; 127(12):1568-1574. PubMed ID: 32406174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Risk of complications in a second pregnancy following caesarean section in the first pregnancy: a population-based study.
    Taylor LK; Simpson JM; Roberts CL; Olive EC; Henderson-Smart DJ
    Med J Aust; 2005 Nov; 183(10):515-9. PubMed ID: 16296964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Maternal Morbidity in the Second Stage of Labor: Analysis to Simulate the Clinical Choice.
    Little SE; Clapp MA; Lassey S; Bukowski R; Barth WH; Robinson J
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e312-e317. PubMed ID: 35709729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes from full-dilatation cesarean deliveries using the Fetal Pillow or hand-push method.
    Safa H; Beckmann M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Dec; 135(3):281-284. PubMed ID: 27599604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of extending the second stage of labor to prevent primary cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    Zipori Y; Grunwald O; Ginsberg Y; Beloosesky R; Weiner Z
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 220(2):191.e1-191.e7. PubMed ID: 30616966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Outcomes of breech birth by mode of delivery: a population linkage study.
    Bin YS; Roberts CL; Ford JB; Nicholl MC
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Oct; 56(5):453-459. PubMed ID: 27339863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Disengagement of the deeply engaged fetal head during cesarean section in advanced labor: conventional method versus reverse breech extraction.
    Chopra S; Bagga R; Keepanasseril A; Jain V; Kalra J; Suri V
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(10):1163-6. PubMed ID: 19925377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of "push" and "pull" methods for impacted fetal head extraction during cesarean delivery.
    Veisi F; Zangeneh M; Malekkhosravi S; Rezavand N
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2012 Jul; 118(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 22541809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour.
    Tempest N; Hart A; Walkinshaw S; Hapangama DK
    BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120(10):1277-84. PubMed ID: 23906197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reverse breech extraction in cases of second stage caesarean section.
    Schwake D; Petchenkin L; Younis JS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Aug; 32(6):548-51. PubMed ID: 22779959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes by mode of delivery. A case-controlled study.
    Benedetto C; Marozio L; Prandi G; Roccia A; Blefari S; Fabris C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Nov; 135(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 17126475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A study of caesarean section cases with special reference to maternal and neonatal outcome.
    Dey N; Hatai SK
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1992 Jun; 90(6):149-51. PubMed ID: 1522304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Committee Opinion No. 415: Impacted Fetal Head, Second-Stage Cesarean Delivery.
    Bloch C; Dore S; Hobson S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Mar; 43(3):406-413. PubMed ID: 33640101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The impacted foetal head at caesarean section: incidence and techniques used in a single UK institution.
    Rice A; Tydeman G; Briley A; Seed PT
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Oct; 39(7):948-951. PubMed ID: 31215269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
    Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Symphysiotomy or caesarean section after failed trial of assisted delivery.
    Mola GD
    P N G Med J; 1995 Sep; 38(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 9522856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A case-control study about foetal trauma during caesarean delivery.
    Dolivet E; Delesalle C; Morello R; Blouet M; Bronfen C; Dreyfus M; Benoist G
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Sep; 47(7):325-329. PubMed ID: 29793034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Outcome in second- versus first-stage cesarean delivery in a teaching institution in eastern India.
    Seal SL; Kamilya G; Mukherji J; Bhattacharyya SK; De A; Hazra A
    Am J Perinatol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):507-12. PubMed ID: 20175041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.