296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30917799)
1. Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study.
Lenz F; Kimmich N; Zimmermann R; Kreft M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Mar; 19(1):98. PubMed ID: 30917799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vaginal delivery of breech presentation.
Kotaska A; Menticoglou S; Gagnon R;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Jun; 31(6):557-566. PubMed ID: 19646324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Techniques for assisting difficult delivery at caesarean section.
Waterfall H; Grivell RM; Dodd JM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Jan; 2016(1):CD004944. PubMed ID: 26827159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reverse breech extraction versus the standard approach of pushing the impacted fetal head up through the vagina in caesarean section for obstructed labour: A randomised controlled trial.
Nooh AM; Abdeldayem HM; Ben-Affan O
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 May; 37(4):459-463. PubMed ID: 28141942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reverse Breech Extraction Vs Head Pushing For Delivery Of Deeply Impacted Fetal Head In Emergency Caesarean Section.
Tahir N; Shahid G; Adil M; Fatima S
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2020; 32(4):497-501. PubMed ID: 33225651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 'push method' with 'Patwardhan's method' on maternal and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing caesarean section in second stage.
Keepanasseril A; Shaik N; Kubera NS; Adhisivam B; Maurya DK
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Jul; 39(5):606-611. PubMed ID: 30917720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Disengagement of the deeply engaged fetal head during cesarean section in advanced labor: conventional method versus reverse breech extraction.
Chopra S; Bagga R; Keepanasseril A; Jain V; Kalra J; Suri V
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(10):1163-6. PubMed ID: 19925377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Head pushing versus reverse breech extraction in cases of impacted fetal head during Cesarean section.
Levy R; Chernomoretz T; Appelman Z; Levin D; Or Y; Hagay ZJ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jul; 121(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 15961214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A meta-analysis of reverse breech extraction to deliver a deeply impacted head during cesarean delivery.
Berhan Y; Berhan A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Feb; 124(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 24290068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Delivery of the impacted head of the fetus at caesarean section after prolonged obstructed labour: a randomised comparative study of two methods.
Fasubaa OB; Ezechi OC; Orji EO; Ogunniyi SO; Akindele ST; Loto OM; Okogbo FO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):375-8. PubMed ID: 12521457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of techniques used to deliver a deeply impacted fetal head at full dilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jeve YB; Navti OB; Konje JC
BJOG; 2016 Feb; 123(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 26301522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of maternal and perinatal morbidity between elective and emergency caesarean section in singleton-term breech presentation.
Anuwutnavin S; Kitnithee B; Chanprapaph P; Heamar S; Rongdech P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 May; 40(4):500-506. PubMed ID: 31478414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preferred way of delivery of the impacted fetal head in cesarean sections during second stage of labor.
Gil M; Chill HH; Kogan L; Porat S; Levitt L; Eliasi E; Dior U
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2386-2393. PubMed ID: 31502321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cephalic extraction versus breech extraction in second-stage caesarean section: a retrospective study.
Ezra O; Lahav-Ezra H; Meyer R; Cahan T; Ilan H; Mazaki-Tovi S; Sivan E; Barzilay E; Haas J
BJOG; 2020 Nov; 127(12):1568-1574. PubMed ID: 32406174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reverse breech extraction versus head pushing in cesarean section for obstructed labor. A comparative study in Yemen.
Frass KA; Al Eryani A; Al-Harazi AH
Saudi Med J; 2011 Dec; 32(12):1261-6. PubMed ID: 22159381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of a RCT of techniques for managing an impacted fetal head during emergency caesarean section: the MIDAS scoping study.
Walker KF; Mitchell EJ; Ayers S; Jones NW; Ogollah R; Wakefield N; Dorling J; Pallotti P; Pillai A; Tempest N; Plachcinski R; Bradshaw L; Knight M; Thornton JG
Health Technol Assess; 2023 Mar; 27(6):1-87. PubMed ID: 37022927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Techniques for managing an impacted fetal head at caesarean section: A systematic review.
Gq Peak A; Barwise E; Walker KF
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Feb; 281():12-22. PubMed ID: 36525940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does internal podalic version of the non-vertex second twin still have a place in obstetrics? A Danish national retrospective cohort study.
Jonsdottir F; Henriksen L; Secher NJ; Maaløe N
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jan; 94(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 25283062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcome of term breech births: 10-year experience at a district general hospital.
Pradhan P; Mohajer M; Deshpande S
BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 15663587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SOGC clinical practice guideline: Vaginal delivery of breech presentation: no. 226, June 2009.
Kotaska A; Menticoglou S; Gagnon R; Farine D; Basso M; Bos H; Delisle MF; Grabowska K; Hudon L; Mundle W; Murphy-Kaulbeck L; Ouellet A; Pressey T; Roggensack A;
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Nov; 107(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 19824190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
