These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30919277)

  • 21. An electrophysiological signature of summed similarity in visual working memory.
    van Vugt MK; Sekuler R; Wilson HR; Kahana MJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 May; 142(2):412-25. PubMed ID: 22963189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Active versus passive maintenance of visual nonverbal memory.
    McKeown D; Holt J; Delvenne JF; Smith A; Griffiths B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Aug; 21(4):1041-7. PubMed ID: 24390797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Do familiar memory items decay?
    Ricker TJ; Sandry J; Vergauwe E; Cowan N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jan; 46(1):60-76. PubMed ID: 31107048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does ROC asymmetry reverse when detecting new stimuli? Reinvestigating whether the retrievability of mnemonic information is task-dependent.
    Meyer-Grant CG; Klauer KC
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Jan; 51(1):160-174. PubMed ID: 35984624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A probabilistic model of visual working memory: Incorporating higher order regularities into working memory capacity estimates.
    Brady TF; Tenenbaum JB
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Jan; 120(1):85-109. PubMed ID: 23230888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What was that object? On the role of identity information in the formation of object files and conscious object perception.
    Goodhew SC
    Psychol Res; 2020 Oct; 84(7):2018-2033. PubMed ID: 31129739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gestalt Effects in Visual Working Memory.
    Kałamała P; Sadowska A; Ordziniak W; Chuderski A
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Jan; 64(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 28219257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Introspection during short-term memory scanning.
    Reyes G; Sackur J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Oct; 71(10):2088-2100. PubMed ID: 30226428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dimension-based attention in visual short-term memory.
    Pilling M; Barrett DJ
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):740-9. PubMed ID: 26920437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The distribution of subjective memory strength: list strength and response bias.
    Criss AH
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Dec; 59(4):297-319. PubMed ID: 19765699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A motor task, not working memory, causes the revelation effect.
    Miura H; Itoh Y
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2024 Jun; 78(2):81-87. PubMed ID: 37917423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. One mirror effect: The regularities of recognition memory.
    Hilford A; Glanzer M; Kim K; Maloney LT
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Feb; 47(2):266-278. PubMed ID: 30288686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Repulsive Serial Effects in Visual Numerosity Judgments.
    Valsecchi M; Stucchi N; Scocchia L
    Perception; 2018 Jul; 47(7):780-788. PubMed ID: 29732905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The reliability and internal consistency of one-shot and flicker change detection for measuring individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Pailian H; Halberda J
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Apr; 43(3):397-420. PubMed ID: 25504317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Storing information in-the-world: Metacognition and cognitive offloading in a short-term memory task.
    Risko EF; Dunn TL
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Nov; 36():61-74. PubMed ID: 26092219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Summary statistics in the attentional blink.
    McNair NA; Goodbourn PT; Shone LT; Harris IM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):100-116. PubMed ID: 27739015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparing exponential race and signal detection models of encoding stimuli into visual short-term memory.
    Larsen A; Markussen B; Bundesen C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Jun; 46(6):643-655. PubMed ID: 32271079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Homogeneity computation: how interitem similarity in visual short-term memory alters recognition.
    Viswanathan S; Perl DR; Visscher KM; Kahana MJ; Sekuler R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Feb; 17(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 20081162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Visual similarity at encoding and retrieval in an item recognition task.
    Mate J; Baqués J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1277-84. PubMed ID: 19235099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On the role of individual items in recognition memory and metacognition: challenges for signal detection theory.
    Busey TA; Arici A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1123-36. PubMed ID: 19686009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.