325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30919518)
1. Monoexponential, Biexponential, and stretched-exponential models using diffusion-weighted imaging: A quantitative differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0T.
Jin YN; Zhang Y; Cheng JL; Zheng DD; Hu Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 50(5):1461-1467. PubMed ID: 30919518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast lesion characterization using whole-lesion histogram analysis with stretched-exponential diffusion model.
Liu C; Wang K; Li X; Zhang J; Ding J; Spuhler K; Duong T; Liang C; Huang C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 47(6):1701-1710. PubMed ID: 29165847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI.
Liu C; Liang C; Liu Z; Zhang S; Huang B
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e782-9. PubMed ID: 24034833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of focal liver lesions using the stretched exponential model: comparison with monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
Kim HC; Seo N; Chung YE; Park MS; Choi JY; Kim MJ
Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):5111-5120. PubMed ID: 30796578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted imaging models: Quantitative biomarkers for differentiating renal clear cell carcinoma and minimal fat angiomyolipoma.
Li H; Liang L; Li A; Hu Y; Hu D; Li Z; Kamel IR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 46(1):240-247. PubMed ID: 27859853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiparametric diffusion-weighted imaging in breast lesions: Association with pathologic diagnosis and prognostic factors.
Suo S; Cheng F; Cao M; Kang J; Wang M; Hua J; Hua X; Li L; Lu Q; Liu J; Xu J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Sep; 46(3):740-750. PubMed ID: 28139036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of Monoexponential, Biexponential, and Stretched Exponential Diffusion-weighted MRI in Differentiating Tumor Stage and Histological Grade of Bladder Cancer.
Wang Y; Hu D; Yu H; Shen Y; Tang H; Kamel IR; Li Z
Acad Radiol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):239-246. PubMed ID: 29753491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of diffusion kurtosis imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the differentiation of breast tumors.
Li T; Yu T; Li L; Lu L; Zhuo Y; Lian J; Xiong Y; Kong D; Li K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1358-1366. PubMed ID: 29717790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative differentiation of breast lesions at 3T diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using the ratio of distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC).
Ertas G; Onaygil C; Akin Y; Kaya H; Aribal E
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Dec; 44(6):1633-1641. PubMed ID: 27284961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between types I and II epithelial ovarian cancer using histogram analysis of monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential diffusion models.
Wang F; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Liu C; Xie L; Zhou Z; Liang D; Shen Y; Yao Z; Liu J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1797-1809. PubMed ID: 28379611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Grading and proliferation assessment of diffuse astrocytic tumors with monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging.
Zhang J; Chen X; Chen D; Wang Z; Li S; Zhu W
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Dec; 109():188-195. PubMed ID: 30527302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monoexponential, biexponential and stretched exponential models of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in glioma in relation to histopathologic grade and Ki-67 labeling index using high B values.
Chaudhary N; Zhang G; Li S; Zhu W
Am J Transl Res; 2021; 13(11):12480-12494. PubMed ID: 34956467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of Mono-exponential, Bi-exponential, and Stretched Exponential Signal Models in Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Hepatic Lesions.
Noda Y; Goshima S; Fujimoto K; Akamine Y; Kajita K; Kawai N; Matsuo M
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2021 Mar; 20(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 32161202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Monoexponential, Biexponential, Stretched-Exponential, and Kurtosis Models of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiation of Renal Solid Masses.
Zhang J; Suo S; Liu G; Zhang S; Zhao Z; Xu J; Wu G
Korean J Radiol; 2019 May; 20(5):791-800. PubMed ID: 30993930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of Gaussian and non-Gaussian diffusion models for differential diagnosis of prostate cancer with in-bore transrectal MR-guided biopsy as a pathological reference.
Li C; Chen M; Wan B; Yu J; Liu M; Zhang W; Wang J
Acta Radiol; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1395-1402. PubMed ID: 29486596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of breast cancer lesion classification using intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging is improved by the inclusion of global or local prior knowledge with bayesian methods.
Vidić I; Jerome NP; Bathen TF; Goa PE; While PT
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 50(5):1478-1488. PubMed ID: 31070842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiomics Based on Multimodal MRI for the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions.
Zhang Q; Peng Y; Liu W; Bai J; Zheng J; Yang X; Zhou L
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):596-607. PubMed ID: 32061014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Grading of Gliomas by Using Monoexponential, Biexponential, and Stretched Exponential Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging.
Bai Y; Lin Y; Tian J; Shi D; Cheng J; Haacke EM; Hong X; Ma B; Zhou J; Wang M
Radiology; 2016 Feb; 278(2):496-504. PubMed ID: 26230975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histogram analysis of stretched-exponential and monoexponential diffusion-weighted imaging models for distinguishing low and intermediate/high gleason scores in prostate carcinoma.
Liu W; Liu XH; Tang W; Gao HB; Zhou BN; Zhou LP
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Aug; 48(2):491-498. PubMed ID: 29412492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffusion Kurtosis at 3.0T as an in vivo Imaging Marker for Breast Cancer Characterization: Correlation With Prognostic Factors.
Huang Y; Lin Y; Hu W; Ma C; Lin W; Wang Z; Liang J; Ye W; Zhao J; Wu R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):845-856. PubMed ID: 30260589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
