These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30919641)

  • 1. Ferric Sulfate and Formocresol pulpotomies in paediatric dental practice. A prospective-retrospective study.
    Olczak-Kowalczyk D; Samul M; Góra J; Gozdowski D; Turska-Szybka A
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2019 Mar; 20(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 30919641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ferric sulphate and formocresol in pulpotomy of primary molars: long term follow-up study.
    Ibricevic H; Al-Jame Q
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Mar; 4(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 12870985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpotomies in primary molars with formocresol, glutaraldehyde and ferric sulphate.
    Havale R; Anegundi RT; Indushekar K; Sudha P
    Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 23474578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth.
    Smaïl-Faugeron V; Courson F; Durieux P; Muller-Bolla M; Glenny AM; Fron Chabouis H
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Aug; (8):CD003220. PubMed ID: 25099759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sodium hypochlorite versus Formocresol in primary molars pulpotomies: a randomized clinical trial.
    Al-Mutairi MA; Bawazir OA
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Mar; 14(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 23597217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Success rates of mineral trioxide aggregate, ferric sulfate, and formocresol pulpotomies: a 24-month study.
    Erdem AP; Guven Y; Balli B; Ilhan B; Sepet E; Ulukapi I; Aktoren O
    Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 21703067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of three pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth.
    Markovic D; Zivojinovic V; Vucetic M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Sep; 6(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 16216093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo evaluation of the treatment outcome of pulpotomy in primary molars using diode laser, formocresol, and ferric sulphate.
    Durmus B; Tanboga I
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2014 May; 32(5):289-95. PubMed ID: 24717147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A clinical study of ferric sulfate as a pulpotomy agent in primary teeth.
    Fei AL; Udin RD; Johnson R
    Pediatr Dent; 1991; 13(6):327-32. PubMed ID: 1843987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiographic assessment of primary molar pulpotomies restored with resin-based materials.
    Guelmann M; McIlwain MF; Primosch RE
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 15839391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars restored with stainless steel crown vs amalga.
    Holan G; Fuks AB; Ketlz N
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 12064493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized study of sodium hypochlorite versus formocresol pulpotomy in primary molar teeth.
    Ruby JD; Cox CF; Mitchell SC; Makhija S; Chompu-Inwai P; Jackson J
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Mar; 23(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 22502601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiographic success of ferric sulfate and formocresol pulpotomies in relation to early exfoliation.
    Vargas KG; Packham B
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 16173229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of ferric sulfate, formocresol, and a combination of ferric sulfate/formocresol in primary tooth vital pulpotomies: a retrospective radiographic survey.
    Burnett S; Walker J
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(1):44-8, 12. PubMed ID: 12119812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of 4 pulpotomy techniques--randomized controlled trial.
    Huth KC; Paschos E; Hajek-Al-Khatar N; Hollweck R; Crispin A; Hickel R; Folwaczny M
    J Dent Res; 2005 Dec; 84(12):1144-8. PubMed ID: 16304444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of formocresol and mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomized primary molars--2 year follow up.
    Airen P; Shigli A; Airen B
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012; 37(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 23534319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Formocresol, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Portland Cement, and Enamel Matrix Derivative in Primary Teeth Pulpotomies: A Two Year Follow-Up.
    Yildirim C; Basak F; Akgun OM; Polat GG; Altun C
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 26696101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Light-cured calcium hydroxide vs formocresol in human primary molar pulpotomies: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zurn D; Seale NS
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 18402097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp medicaments for pulpotomies in primary molars.
    Noorollahian H
    Br Dent J; 2008 Jun; 204(11):E20. PubMed ID: 18425074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of formocresol and ferric sulfate as pulpotomy material in primary molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Jayaraman J; Nagendrababu V; Pulikkotil SJ; Veettil SK; Dhar V
    Quintessence Int; 2020; 51(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 31781690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.