These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30919664)

  • 1. Trifactor Models for Multiple-Ratings Data.
    Shin HJ; Rabe-Hesketh S; Wilson M
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(3):360-381. PubMed ID: 30919664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A trifactor model for integrating ratings across multiple informants.
    Bauer DJ; Howard AL; Baldasaro RE; Curran PJ; Hussong AM; Chassin L; Zucker RA
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Dec; 18(4):475-93. PubMed ID: 24079932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examining the Performance of the Trifactor Model for Multiple Raters.
    Soland J; Kuhfeld M
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Jan; 46(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 34898747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Hierarchical Rater Model for Longitudinal Data.
    Casabianca JM; Junker BW; Nieto R; Bond MA
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(5):576-592. PubMed ID: 28846050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Seeing Things Differently or Seeing Different Things? Exploring Raters' Associations of Noncognitive Attributes.
    Sebok SS; Syer MD
    Acad Med; 2015 Nov; 90(11 Suppl):S50-5. PubMed ID: 26505102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Bayesian Multilevel Trifactor Item Response Theory Model.
    Fujimoto KA
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Jun; 79(3):462-494. PubMed ID: 31105319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring the Impersonal Judgments and Personal Preferences of Raters in Rater-Mediated Assessments With Unfolding Models.
    Wang J; Engelhard G
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Aug; 79(4):773-795. PubMed ID: 32655183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examining rating scales using Rasch and Mokken models for rater-mediated assessments.
    Wind SA
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(2):100-32. PubMed ID: 24950531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sequential Effects in Essay Ratings: Evidence of Assimilation Effects Using Cross-Classified Models.
    Zhao H; Andersson B; Guo B; Xin T
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():933. PubMed ID: 28638360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combined Approach to Multi-Informant Data Using Latent Factors and Latent Classes: Trifactor Mixture Model.
    Kim E; von der Embse N
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Aug; 81(4):728-755. PubMed ID: 34267398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human ratings take time: A hierarchical facets model for the joint analysis of ratings and rating times.
    Jin KY; Eckes T
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3535-3547. PubMed ID: 37919615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple-rater kappas for binary data: Models and interpretation.
    Stoyan D; Pommerening A; Hummel M; Kopp-Schneider A
    Biom J; 2018 Mar; 60(2):381-394. PubMed ID: 29280179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting Rater Effects under Rating Designs with Varying Levels of Missingness.
    Stafford RE; Wolfe EW; Casablanca JM; Song T
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(3):243-257. PubMed ID: 30169333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in inter-rater reliability and accuracy for a treatment adherence scale.
    Wu SM; Whiteside U; Neighbors C
    Cogn Behav Ther; 2007; 36(4):230-9. PubMed ID: 18049948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CFA Models with a General Factor and Multiple Sets of Secondary Factors.
    Jeon M; Rijmen F; Rabe-Hesketh S
    Psychometrika; 2018 Dec; 83(4):785-808. PubMed ID: 30120699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychometric Models for Scoring Multiple Reporter Assessments: Applications to Integrative Data Analysis in Prevention Science and Beyond.
    Curran PJ; Georgeson AR; Bauer DJ; Hussong AM
    Int J Behav Dev; 2021 Jan; 45(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 33758447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The validity of well-being measures: a multiple-indicator-multiple-rater model.
    Zou C; Schimmack U; Gere J
    Psychol Assess; 2013 Dec; 25(4):1247-54. PubMed ID: 23914958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing Imputation Methods for Trait Estimation Using the Rating Scale Model.
    Stafford RE; Runyon CR; Casabianca JM; Dodd BG
    J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(1):12-27. PubMed ID: 28453496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Construct validity of the WISC-IV with a referred sample: direct versus indirect hierarchical structures.
    Canivez GL
    Sch Psychol Q; 2014 Mar; 29(1):38-51. PubMed ID: 23895320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can student self-ratings be compared with peer ratings? A study of measurement invariance of multisource feedback.
    Lee KL; Tsai SL; Chiu YT; Ho MJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 May; 21(2):401-13. PubMed ID: 26387118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.