These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30919943)

  • 1. Using multidimensional item response theory to evaluate how response styles impact measurement.
    Adams DJ; Bolt DM; Deng S; Smith SS; Baker TB
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):466-485. PubMed ID: 30919943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response style analysis with threshold and multi-process IRT models: A review and tutorial.
    Böckenholt U; Meiser T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):159-181. PubMed ID: 28130934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement and control of response styles using anchoring vignettes: a model-based approach.
    Bolt DM; Lu Y; Kim JS
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Dec; 19(4):528-41. PubMed ID: 24773355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of classical and modern methods for measuring and correcting for acquiescence.
    Primi R; Santos D; De Fruyt F; John OP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):447-465. PubMed ID: 31032894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The value of using test response data for content validity: An application of the bifactor-MIRT to a nursing knowledge test.
    Cai Y
    Nurse Educ Today; 2015 Dec; 35(12):1181-5. PubMed ID: 26043656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic Response Strategies: Accounting for Response Process Heterogeneity in IRTree Decision Nodes.
    Merhof V; Meiser T
    Psychometrika; 2023 Dec; 88(4):1354-1380. PubMed ID: 36746887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A psychometric model for respondent-level anchoring on self-report rating scale instruments.
    Lyu W; Bolt DM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2022 Feb; 75(1):116-135. PubMed ID: 34350978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combining mixture distribution and multidimensional IRTree models for the measurement of extreme response styles.
    Khorramdel L; von Davier M; Pokropek A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):538-559. PubMed ID: 31385610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement and control of bias in patient reported outcomes using multidimensional item response theory.
    Dowling NM; Bolt DM; Deng S; Li C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 May; 16():63. PubMed ID: 27229310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation on types of invariance in studying extreme response bias with an IRTree approach.
    Jeon M; De Boeck P
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):517-537. PubMed ID: 31292952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Gratitude Resentment and Appreciation Test-Revised Short (GRAT-RS): A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Analysis in Italian Workers.
    Svicher A; Palazzeschi L; Gori A; Di Fabio A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 19(24):. PubMed ID: 36554667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extreme Response Style: A Simulation Study Comparison of Three Multidimensional Item Response Models.
    Leventhal BC
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jun; 43(4):322-335. PubMed ID: 31156283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Stability of Extreme Response Style and Acquiescence Over 8 Years.
    Wetzel E; Lüdtke O; Zettler I; Böhnke JR
    Assessment; 2016 Jun; 23(3):279-91. PubMed ID: 25986062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of Response Styles Using the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model: A Tutorial and Comparison With Sum Scores.
    Falk CF; Ju U
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():72. PubMed ID: 32116902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Different approaches to modeling response styles in divide-by-total item response theory models (part 2): Applications and novel extensions.
    Henninger M; Meiser T
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Oct; 25(5):577-595. PubMed ID: 33017167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing item-feature effects with item response tree models.
    Böckenholt U
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):486-500. PubMed ID: 30912584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do Response Styles Affect Estimates of Growth on Social-Emotional Constructs? Evidence from Four Years of Longitudinal Survey Scores.
    Soland J; Kuhfeld M
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(6):853-873. PubMed ID: 32633574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noncompensatory MIRT For Passage-Based Tests.
    Kim N; Bolt DM; Wollack J
    Psychometrika; 2022 Sep; 87(3):992-1009. PubMed ID: 35060012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multidimensional Item Response Theory in the Style of Collaborative Filtering.
    Bergner Y; Halpin P; Vie JJ
    Psychometrika; 2022 Mar; 87(1):266-288. PubMed ID: 34698979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robustness of Projective IRT to Misspecification of the Underlying Multidimensional Model.
    Strachan T; Ip E; Fu Y; Ackerman T; Chen SH; Willse J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Jul; 44(5):362-375. PubMed ID: 32879536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.