BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30920130)

  • 21. A Monte Carlo model for independent dose verification in serial tomotherapy.
    Sarkar V; Stathakis S; Papanikolaou N
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Oct; 7(5):385-92. PubMed ID: 18783289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Analysis of direct clinical consequences of MLC positional errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using 3D dosimetry system.
    Nithiyanantham K; Mani GK; Subramani V; Mueller L; Palaniappan KK; Kataria T
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):296–305. PubMed ID: 26699311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Secondary monitor unit calculations for VMAT using parallelized Monte Carlo simulations.
    Bhagroo S; French SB; Mathews JA; Nazareth DP
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):60-69. PubMed ID: 31127699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Experimental Validation of Monte Carlo Simulations Based on a Virtual Source Model for TomoTherapy in a RANDO Phantom.
    Yuan J; Zheng Y; Wessels B; Lo SS; Ellis R; Machtay M; Yao M
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Dec; 15(6):796-804. PubMed ID: 26376697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improvements in treatment planning calculations motivated by tightening IMRT QA tolerances.
    Stambaugh C; Gagneur J; Uejo A; Clouser E; Ezzell G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):250-257. PubMed ID: 30599085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
    Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of DVH-based plan verification methods for VMAT: ArcCHECK-3DVH system and dynalog-based dose reconstruction.
    Saito M; Kadoya N; Sato K; Ito K; Dobashi S; Takeda K; Onishi H; Jingu K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 18(4):206-214. PubMed ID: 28649722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy treatment plans for total marrow irradiation created using GPU and CPU dose calculation engines.
    Nalichowski A; Burmeister J
    Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071716. PubMed ID: 23822420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantitative evaluation of 3D dosimetry for stereotactic volumetric-modulated arc delivery using COMPASS.
    Vikraman S; Manigandan D; Karrthick KP; Sambasivaselli R; Senniandavar V; Ramu M; Rajesh T; Lutz M; Muthukumaran M; Karthikeyan N; Tejinder K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 16(1):5128. PubMed ID: 25679152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
    Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluating Mobius3D Dose Calculation Accuracy for Small-Field Flattening- Filter-Free Photon Beams.
    Kim C; Kim J; Lee YK; Shin HB; Han MC; Kim H; Kim JS
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2022; 21():15330338221141542. PubMed ID: 36567632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Commissioning and quality assurance of a commercial stereotactic treatment-planning system for extracranial IMRT.
    Wang L; Li J; Paskalev K; Hoban P; Luo W; Chen L; McNeeley S; Price R; Ma C
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2006; 7(1):21-34. PubMed ID: 16518314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. On the use of a convolution-superposition algorithm for plan checking in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.
    Hardcastle N; Oborn BM; Haworth A
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):99-110. PubMed ID: 27685114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Three-dimensional gamma analysis of dose distributions in individual structures for IMRT dose verification.
    Tomiyama Y; Araki F; Oono T; Hioki K
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2014 Jul; 7(2):303-9. PubMed ID: 24796955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dose-volume histogram comparison between static 5-field IMRT with 18-MV X-rays and helical tomotherapy with 6-MV X-rays.
    Hayashi A; Shibamoto Y; Hattori Y; Tamura T; Iwabuchi M; Otsuka S; Sugie C; Yanagi T
    J Radiat Res; 2015 Mar; 56(2):338-45. PubMed ID: 25609741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Automatic commissioning of a GPU-based Monte Carlo radiation dose calculation code for photon radiotherapy.
    Tian Z; Graves YJ; Jia X; Jiang SB
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 59(21):6467-86. PubMed ID: 25295381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Validation of a method for in vivo 3D dose reconstruction for IMRT and VMAT treatments using on-treatment EPID images and a model-based forward-calculation algorithm.
    Van Uytven E; Van Beek T; McCowan PM; Chytyk-Praznik K; Greer PB; McCurdy BM
    Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):6945-54. PubMed ID: 26632050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Helical tomotherapy to LINAC plan conversion utilizing RayStation Fallback planning.
    Zhang X; Penagaricano J; Narayanasamy G; Corry P; Liu T; Sanjay M; Paudel N; Morrill S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):178-185. PubMed ID: 28291935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An in vivo dose verification method for SBRT-VMAT delivery using the EPID.
    McCowan PM; Van Uytven E; Van Beek T; Asuni G; McCurdy BM
    Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):6955-63. PubMed ID: 26632051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cobalt-60 tomotherapy: clinical treatment planning and phantom dose delivery studies.
    Dhanesar S; Darko J; Joshi CP; Kerr A; Schreiner LJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081710. PubMed ID: 23927307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.