570 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30920146)
41. A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system.
Lin L; Huang S; Kang M; Hiltunen P; Vanderstraeten R; Lindberg J; Siljamaki S; Wareing T; Davis I; Barnett A; McGhee J; Simone CB; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Ainsley C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):44-49. PubMed ID: 28300385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Implementation of Sphinx/Lynx as daily QA equipment for scanned proton and carbon ion beams.
Grevillot L; Moreno JO; Fuchs H; Dreindl R; Elia A; Bolsa-Ferruz M; Stock M; Palmans H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 24(4):e13896. PubMed ID: 36704919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Development of a log file analysis tool for proton patient QA, system performance tracking, and delivered dose reconstruction.
Ates O; Pirlepesov F; Zhao L; Hua CH; Merchant TE
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 24(7):e13972. PubMed ID: 36951089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A multi-layer strip ionization chamber (MLSIC) device for proton pencil beam scan quality assurance.
Zhou S; Rao W; Chen Q; Tan Y; Smith W; Sun B; Zhou J; Chang CW; Lin L; Darafsheh A; Zhao T; Zhang T
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Aug; 67(17):. PubMed ID: 35905730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Factors influencing the performance of patient specific quality assurance for pencil beam scanning IMPT fields.
Trnková P; Bolsi A; Albertini F; Weber DC; Lomax AJ
Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):5998. PubMed ID: 27806620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Is noncoplanar plan more robust to inter-fractional variations than coplanar plan in treating bilateral HN tumors with pencil-beam scanning proton beams?
Yi B; Jatczak J; Deng W; Poirier YP; Yao W; Witek ME; Molitoris JK; Zakhary MJ; Zhang B; Biswal NC; Ferris MJ; Mossahebi S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 25(2):e14186. PubMed ID: 37974385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A Monte-Carlo study to assess the effect of 1.5 T magnetic fields on the overall robustness of pencil-beam scanning proton radiotherapy plans for prostate cancer.
Kurz C; Landry G; Resch AF; Dedes G; Kamp F; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Raaymakers BW; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(21):8470-8482. PubMed ID: 29047455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The use of a mini-ridge filter with cyclotron-based pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
O'Grady F; Janson M; Rao AD; Chawla AK; Stephenson L; Fan J; Wang P
Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 36709409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Collimated proton pencil-beam scanning for superficial targets: impact of the order of range shifter and aperture.
Bäumer C; Janson M; Timmermann B; Wulff J
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Apr; 63(8):085020. PubMed ID: 29553047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Optimization and quality assurance of an image-guided radiation therapy system for intensity-modulated radiation therapy radiotherapy.
Tsai JS; Micaily B; Miyamoto C
Med Dosim; 2012; 37(3):321-33. PubMed ID: 22417899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Feasibility study of a plastic scintillating plate-based treatment beam fluence monitoring system for use in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Jeong S; Chung K; Ahn SH; Lee B; Seo J; Yoon M
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):703-712. PubMed ID: 31732965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A novel phantom and procedure providing submillimeter accuracy in daily QA tests of accelerators used for stereotactic radiosurgery*.
Brezovich IA; Popple RA; Duan J; Shen S; Wu X; Benhabib S; Huang M; Cardan RA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):246-253. PubMed ID: 27455506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The first prototype of spot-scanning proton arc treatment delivery.
Li X; Liu G; Janssens G; De Wilde O; Bossier V; Lerot X; Pouppez A; Yan D; Stevens C; Kabolizadeh P; Ding X
Radiother Oncol; 2019 Aug; 137():130-136. PubMed ID: 31100606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effects of spot parameters in pencil beam scanning treatment planning.
Kraan AC; Depauw N; Clasie B; Giunta M; Madden T; Kooy HM
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):60-73. PubMed ID: 29148575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Evaluations of a flat-panel based compact daily quality assurance device for proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) system.
Su Z; Hsi W; Forthomme J; Rossomme S
Phys Med; 2020 Dec; 80():243-250. PubMed ID: 33202363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Technical Note: A simple and fast daily quality assurance solution for modulated scanning proton and carbon ion beams.
Chen JN; Moyers MF; Lin LC
Med Phys; 2021 Oct; 48(10):5684-5693. PubMed ID: 34370305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Development and implementation of EPID-based quality assurance tests for the small animal radiation research platform (SARRP).
Anvari A; Poirier Y; Sawant A
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3246-3257. PubMed ID: 29704440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Clinical examination of proton pencil beam scanning on a moving anthropomorphic lung phantom.
Wang P; Tang S; Taylor PA; Cummings DE; Janson M; Traneus E; Sturgeon JD; Lee AK; Chang C
Med Dosim; 2019 Summer; 44(2):122-129. PubMed ID: 29759487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A software tool to automatically assure and report daily treatment deliveries by a cobalt-60 radiation therapy device.
Yang D; Wooten HO; Green O; Li HH; Liu S; Li X; Rodriguez V; Mutic S; Kashani R
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):492-501. PubMed ID: 27167269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
