BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30920252)

  • 1. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
    Kerzel D; Witzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory.
    Hollingworth A; Beck VM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 27123681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual Working Memory Load Disrupts Template-guided Attentional Selection during Visual Search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1902-1915. PubMed ID: 30125222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual search with varying versus consistent attentional templates: Effects on target template establishment, comparison, and guidance.
    Goldstein RR; Beck MR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1086-1102. PubMed ID: 29620379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adding details to the attentional template offsets search difficulty: Evidence from contralateral delay activity.
    Schmidt J; Zelinsky GJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):429-437. PubMed ID: 28240928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The allocation of working memory resources determines the efficiency of attentional templates in single- and dual-target search.
    Huynh Cong S; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Dec; 151(12):2977-2989. PubMed ID: 35696178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Capacity limitations in template-guided multiple color search.
    Kerzel D; Grubert A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):901-909. PubMed ID: 34918268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple representations in visual working memory simultaneously guide attention: The type of memory-matching representation matters.
    Fan L; Sun M; Xu M; Li Z; Diao L; Zhang X
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():126-137. PubMed ID: 30471521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Control of Single-color and Multiple-color Visual Search by Attentional Templates in Working Memory and in Long-term Memory.
    Grubert A; Carlisle NB; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1947-1963. PubMed ID: 27458746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):926-941. PubMed ID: 32391708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9527-9538. PubMed ID: 30242053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinct prioritization of visual working memory representations for search and for recall.
    Dube B; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1253-1261. PubMed ID: 30644056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Looking sharp: Becoming a search template boosts precision and stability in visual working memory.
    Rajsic J; Ouslis NE; Wilson DE; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1643-1651. PubMed ID: 28537011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple states in visual working memory: Evidence from oculomotor capture by memory-matching distractors.
    Beck VM; Vickery TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1340-1346. PubMed ID: 31037604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can you have multiple attentional templates? Large-scale replications of Van Moorselaar, Theeuwes, and Olivers (2014) and Hollingworth and Beck (2016).
    Frătescu M; Van Moorselaar D; Mathôt S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2700-2709. PubMed ID: 31309532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Competition in saccade target selection reveals attentional guidance by simultaneously active working memory representations.
    Beck VM; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):225-230. PubMed ID: 28134550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Separating the effects of visual working memory load and attentional zoom on selective attention.
    Lee H; Jeong SK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 May; 46(5):502-511. PubMed ID: 32162967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New templates interfere with existing templates depending on their respective priority in visual working memory.
    Huynh Cong S; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1313-1327. PubMed ID: 32757589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.