465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30920252)
21. Object features reinstated from episodic memory guide attentional selection.
Kerzel D; Andres MK
Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104158. PubMed ID: 31986352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Distractor probability changes the shape of the attentional template.
Geng JJ; DiQuattro NE; Helm J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1993-2007. PubMed ID: 28425732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors.
Beesley T; Hanafi G; Vadillo MA; Shanks DR; Livesey EJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):707-721. PubMed ID: 29608077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention.
Bahle B; Beck VM; Hollingworth A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):992-1011. PubMed ID: 29629781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Concurrent guidance of attention by multiple working memory items: Behavioral and computational evidence.
Zhou C; Lorist MM; Mathôt S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Aug; 82(6):2950-2962. PubMed ID: 32394070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Learned suppression for multiple distractors in visual search.
Won BY; Geng JJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1128-1141. PubMed ID: 29733673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Guidance of visual search by negative attentional templates depends on task demands.
Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Jun; 48(6):653-664. PubMed ID: 35446088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The roles of relevance and expectation for the control of attention in visual search.
Berggren N; Eimer M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1191-1205. PubMed ID: 31157535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. When shorter delays lead to worse memories: Task disruption makes visual working memory temporarily vulnerable to test interference.
Wang B; Theeuwes J; Olivers CNL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):722-733. PubMed ID: 29094991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The attentional template is shifted and asymmetrically sharpened by distractor context.
Yu X; Geng JJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):336-353. PubMed ID: 30742475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Exploring the contributions of spatial and non-spatial working memory to priming of pop-out.
Ahn J; Patel TN; Buetti S; Lleras A
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1012-1026. PubMed ID: 28176214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Time limits during visual foraging reveal flexible working memory templates.
Kristjánsson T; Thornton IM; Kristjánsson Á
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jun; 44(6):827-835. PubMed ID: 29809049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Suppression on the basis of template for rejection is reactive: Evidence from human electrophysiology.
Pang C; Chen Y; Zhang Y; Nan W; Fu S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1148-1162. PubMed ID: 38491317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effects of colour complexity and similarity on multiple object tracking performance.
Wang C; Hu L; Talhelm T; Zhang X
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Aug; 72(8):1903-1912. PubMed ID: 30453832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reprioritization of Features of Multidimensional Objects Stored in Visual Working Memory.
Park YE; Sy JL; Hong SW; Tong F
Psychol Sci; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1773-1785. PubMed ID: 28957016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The guidance of spatial attention during visual search for color combinations and color configurations.
Berggren N; Eimer M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1282-96. PubMed ID: 26962846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Memory encoding of syntactic information involves domain-general attentional resources: Evidence from dual-task studies.
Heyselaar E; Segaert K
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1285-1296. PubMed ID: 30185125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Object-based target templates guide attention during visual search.
Berggren N; Eimer M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1368-1382. PubMed ID: 29723006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention?
van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1450-64. PubMed ID: 24730738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
