These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30920427)

  • 1. Use of the Novel C-MAC Video Stylet in a Case of Predicted Difficult Intubation: A Case Report.
    Pius J; Ioanidis K; Noppens RR
    A A Pract; 2019 Aug; 13(3):88-90. PubMed ID: 30920427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of three video laryngoscopy devices to direct laryngoscopy for intubating obese patients: a randomized controlled trial.
    Yumul R; Elvir-Lazo OL; White PF; Sloninsky A; Kaplan M; Kariger R; Naruse R; Parker N; Pham C; Zhang X; Wender RH
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Jun; 31():71-7. PubMed ID: 27185681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improvement in glottic visualisation by using the C-MAC PM video laryngoscope as a first-line device for out-of-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: An observational study.
    Hossfeld B; Frey K; Doerges V; Lampl L; Helm M
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):425-31. PubMed ID: 25886716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Video laryngoscopy and retromolar endoscopy in maxillofacial surgery].
    Zaĭtsev AIu; Svetlov VA; Dubrovin KV
    Anesteziol Reanimatol; 2013; (2):55-7. PubMed ID: 24000653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy : Investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer].
    Ruetzler K; Imach S; Weiss M; Haas T; Schmidt AR
    Anaesthesist; 2015 Jul; 64(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 26174747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between bougies and stylets for simulated tracheal intubation with the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope.
    Batuwitage B; McDonald A; Nishikawa K; Lythgoe D; Mercer S; Charters P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):400-5. PubMed ID: 24675430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ALTERNATIVE DEVICES IN AIRWAY VISUALIZATION.
    Maldini B; Hodžović I; Goranović T
    Acta Clin Croat; 2016 Mar; 55 Suppl 1():76-84. PubMed ID: 27276777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.
    van Zundert A; Maassen R; Lee R; Willems R; Timmerman M; Siemonsma M; Buise M; Wiepking M
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Sep; 109(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 19690253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Indirect videolaryngoscopy with C-MAC D-Blade and GlideScope: a randomized, controlled comparison in patients with suspected difficult airways.
    Serocki G; Neumann T; Scharf E; Dörges V; Cavus E
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2013 Feb; 79(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 23032922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Postoperative sore throat and subglottic injury after McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscopic intubation with versus without a stylet in patients with a high Mallampati score: a randomized controlled trial.
    Yoon HK; Lee HC; Oh H; Jun K; Park HP
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):137. PubMed ID: 31366325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Dynamic Versus Stylet-Guided Intubation on First-Attempt Success in Difficult Airways Undergoing Glidescope Laryngoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Mazzinari G; Rovira L; Henao L; Ortega J; Casasempere A; Fernandez Y; Acosta M; Belaouchi M; Esparza-Miñana JM
    Anesth Analg; 2019 Jun; 128(6):1264-1271. PubMed ID: 31094798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the ease of tracheal intubation using a McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope and a standard Macintosh laryngoscope in normal airways: A randomised trial.
    Thion LA; Belze O; Fischler M; Le Guen M
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2018 Aug; 35(8):631-633. PubMed ID: 29975224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway.
    Aziz MF; Dillman D; Fu R; Brambrink AM
    Anesthesiology; 2012 Mar; 116(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 22261795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. First clinical evaluation of the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope during routine and difficult intubation.
    Cavus E; Neumann T; Doerges V; Moeller T; Scharf E; Wagner K; Bein B; Serocki G
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Feb; 112(2):382-5. PubMed ID: 21156978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GlideScope vs. C-MAC for Awake Upright Laryngoscopy.
    Drenguis AS; Carlson JN
    J Emerg Med; 2015 Sep; 49(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 25989968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: a retrospective analysis.
    Purugganan RV; Jackson TA; Heir JS; Wang H; Cata JP
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2012 Oct; 26(5):845-8. PubMed ID: 22361488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Awake video laryngoscopy - an alternative to awake fiberoptic intubation?].
    Lohse J; Noppens R
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2016 Nov; 51(11-12):656-663. PubMed ID: 27884026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the Contact Force Exerted on Teeth by Conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope Versus Video Laryngoscopes.
    Kato Y; Sakuma Y; Momota Y
    Anesth Prog; 2018; 65(3):151-155. PubMed ID: 30235428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison between the GlideScope® classic and GlideScope® direct video laryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation.
    Heuer JF; Heitmann S; Crozier TA; Bleckmann A; Quintel M; Russo SG
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():330-6. PubMed ID: 27555188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of different stylets used for intubation with the C-MAC D-Blade
    Ömür D; Bayram B; Özbilgin Ş; Hancı V; Kuvaki B
    Rev Bras Anestesiol; 2017; 67(5):450-456. PubMed ID: 28526471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.