308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30920956)
1. Development of a new bed-side-test assessing conditioned pain modulation: a test-retest reliability study.
Larsen JB; Madeleine P; Arendt-Nielsen L
Scand J Pain; 2019 Jul; 19(3):565-574. PubMed ID: 30920956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of the conditioned pain modulation paradigm across three anatomical sites.
Nuwailati R; Curatolo M; LeResche L; Ramsay DS; Spiekerman C; Drangsholt M
Scand J Pain; 2020 Apr; 20(2):283-296. PubMed ID: 31812949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of CPM reliability: quantification of the within-subject reliability of 10 different protocols.
Vaegter HB; Petersen KK; Mørch CD; Imai Y; Arendt-Nielsen L
Scand J Pain; 2018 Oct; 18(4):729-737. PubMed ID: 30007061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel clinical applicable bed-side tool for assessing conditioning pain modulation: proof-of-concept.
Arendt-Nielsen L; Larsen JB; Rasmussen S; Krogh M; Borg L; Madeleine P
Scand J Pain; 2020 Oct; 20(4):801-807. PubMed ID: 32692710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-term test-retest-reliability of conditioned pain modulation using the cold-heat-pain method in healthy subjects and its correlation to parameters of standardized quantitative sensory testing.
Gehling J; Mainka T; Vollert J; Pogatzki-Zahn EM; Maier C; Enax-Krumova EK
BMC Neurol; 2016 Aug; 16():125. PubMed ID: 27495743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychophysical or spinal reflex measures when assessing conditioned pain modulation?
Lie MU; Petriu E; Matre D; Hansson P; Andersen OK; Zwart JA; Nilsen KB
Eur J Pain; 2019 Nov; 23(10):1879-1889. PubMed ID: 31359580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Delayed effects of attention on pain sensitivity and conditioned pain modulation.
Hoegh M; Seminowicz DA; Graven-Nielsen T
Eur J Pain; 2019 Nov; 23(10):1850-1862. PubMed ID: 31343803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A tonic heat test stimulus yields a larger and more reliable conditioned pain modulation effect compared to a phasic heat test stimulus.
Lie MU; Matre D; Hansson P; Stubhaug A; Zwart JA; Nilsen KB
Pain Rep; 2017 Nov; 2(6):e626. PubMed ID: 29392240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Test-retest reliability of pressure pain threshold and heat pain threshold as test stimuli for evaluation of conditioned pain modulation.
Kovacevic M; Klicov L; Vuklis D; Neblett R; Knezevic A
Neurophysiol Clin; 2021 Oct; 51(5):433-442. PubMed ID: 34304974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of repeated conditioning pain modulation in healthy volunteers.
Hoegh M; Petersen KK; Graven-Nielsen T
Eur J Pain; 2018 Nov; 22(10):1833-1843. PubMed ID: 29956411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing test-retest reliability and magnitude of conditioned pain modulation using different combinations of test and conditioning stimuli.
Imai Y; Petersen KK; Mørch CD; Arendt Nielsen L
Somatosens Mot Res; 2016; 33(3-4):169-177. PubMed ID: 27650216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CPM Test-Retest Reliability: "Standard" vs "Single Test-Stimulus" Protocols.
Granovsky Y; Miller-Barmak A; Goldstein O; Sprecher E; Yarnitsky D
Pain Med; 2016 Mar; 17(3):521-529. PubMed ID: 26272736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. User-independent assessment of conditioning pain modulation by cuff pressure algometry.
Graven-Nielsen T; Izumi M; Petersen KK; Arendt-Nielsen L
Eur J Pain; 2017 Mar; 21(3):552-561. PubMed ID: 27859944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interactive effects of conditioned pain modulation and temporal summation of pain-the role of stimulus modality.
Horn-Hofmann C; Kunz M; Madden M; Schnabel EL; Lautenbacher S
Pain; 2018 Dec; 159(12):2641-2648. PubMed ID: 30180086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conditioned pain modulation is affected by occlusion cuff conditioning stimulus intensity, but not duration.
Smith A; Pedler A
Eur J Pain; 2018 Jan; 22(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 28805288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concurrent validity of dynamic bedside quantitative sensory testing paradigms in breast cancer survivors with persistent pain.
Haenen V; Meeus M; Devoogdt N; Morlion B; Dams L; De Groote A; Foubert A; De Groef A
Scand J Pain; 2024 Jan; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 38498596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of types and anatomic arrangement of painful stimuli on conditioned pain modulation.
Klyne DM; Schmid AB; Moseley GL; Sterling M; Hodges PW
J Pain; 2015 Feb; 16(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 25464158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determining Real Change in Conditioned Pain Modulation: A Repeated Measures Study in Healthy Volunteers.
Kennedy DL; Kemp HI; Wu C; Ridout DA; Rice ASC
J Pain; 2020; 21(5-6):708-721. PubMed ID: 31715262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of paradigm and stringent analysis parameters on measuring a net conditioned pain modulation effect: A test, retest, control study.
Cummins TM; McMahon SB; Bannister K
Eur J Pain; 2021 Feb; 25(2):415-429. PubMed ID: 33065759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Effect of Stress on Repeated Painful Stimuli with and Without Painful Conditioning.
Hoegh M; Poulsen JN; Petrini L; Graven-Nielsen T
Pain Med; 2020 Feb; 21(2):317-325. PubMed ID: 31241135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
