82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30921788)
1. CytoProcessorTM: A New Cervical Cancer Screening System for Remote Diagnosis.
Crowell EF; Bazin C; Saunier F; Brixtel R; Caillot Y; Lesner B; Toutain M; Ferreri C; Garcia I; Mathieu MC; Vaussanvin J; Depardon J; Renouf A
Acta Cytol; 2019; 63(3):215-223. PubMed ID: 30921788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adaptation of CytoProcessor for cervical cancer screening of challenging slides.
Crowell EF; Bazin C; Thurotte V; Elie H; Jitaru L; Olivier G; Caillot Y; Brixtel R; Lesner B; Toutain M; Renouf A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Sep; 47(9):890-897. PubMed ID: 31111676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Point-of-Care Digital Cytology With Artificial Intelligence for Cervical Cancer Screening in a Resource-Limited Setting.
Holmström O; Linder N; Kaingu H; Mbuuko N; Mbete J; Kinyua F; Törnquist S; Muinde M; Krogerus L; Lundin M; Diwan V; Lundin J
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Mar; 4(3):e211740. PubMed ID: 33729503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing automated liquid-based cytology samples with a manual liquid-based cytology method using residual cell suspensions from 500 ThinPrep cases.
Maksem JA; Dhanwada V; Trueblood JE; Weidmann J; Kane B; Bolick DR; Bedrossian CW; Kurtycz DF; Stewart J
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Jun; 34(6):391-6. PubMed ID: 16680773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical specimens collected in liquid buffer are suitable for both cytologic screening and ancillary human papillomavirus testing.
Sherman ME; Schiffman MH; Lorincz AT; Herrero R; Hutchinson ML; Bratti C; Zahniser D; Morales J; Hildesheim A; Helgesen K; Kelly D; Alfaro M; Mena F; Balmaceda I; Mango L; Greenberg M
Cancer; 1997 Apr; 81(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 9126136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study.
Monsonego J; Autillo-Touati A; Bergeron C; Dachez R; Liaras J; Saurel J; Zerat L; Chatelain P; Mottot C
Br J Cancer; 2001 Feb; 84(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 11161401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Liquid-based cervical cytology ThinPrep screening in Hungary].
Bak M; Séberné Éll M; Bóka M; Veleczki Z; Nyári T; Pete I; Szentirmay Z
Orv Hetil; 2014 May; 155(18):708-14. PubMed ID: 24776385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic efficacy and validity of the ThinPrep method in cervical cytology.
Tezuka F; Oikawa H; Shuki H; Higashiiwai H
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 8669188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ThinPrep Papanicolaou testing to reduce false-negative cervical cytology.
Linder J; Zahniser D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Feb; 122(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 9499356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Artificial Intelligence-driven Digital Cytology-based Cervical Cancer Screening: Is the Time Ripe to Adopt This Disruptive Technology in Resource-constrained Settings? A Literature Review.
Gupta R; Kumar N; Bansal S; Singh S; Sood N; Gupta S
J Digit Imaging; 2023 Aug; 36(4):1643-1652. PubMed ID: 37029285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors associated with reduced accuracy in Papanicolaou tests for patients with invasive cervical cancer.
Zhao L; Wentzensen N; Zhang RR; Dunn ST; Gold MA; Wang SS; Schiffman M; Walker JL; Zuna RE
Cancer Cytopathol; 2014 Sep; 122(9):694-701. PubMed ID: 24888458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of the ThinPrep Imaging System for internal quality control of cervical cytology.
Heard T; Chandra A; Culora G; Gupta SS; Herbert A; Morgan M
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 22937891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Positive Predictive Value of High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion on Cytology for the Histological Diagnosis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2 or Higher: A Systematic Review.
Karia N; Van Loon A; Simoens C; Benoy I; Bogers J
Acta Cytol; 2019; 63(3):206-214. PubMed ID: 30947186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a nationwide cohort study.
Sundström K; Lu D; Elfström KM; Wang J; Andrae B; Dillner J; Sparén P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):48.e1-48.e15. PubMed ID: 27457115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The challenges of colposcopy for cervical cancer screening in LMICs and solutions by artificial intelligence.
Xue P; Ng MTA; Qiao Y
BMC Med; 2020 Jun; 18(1):169. PubMed ID: 32493320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Cellient automated cell block system is useful in the differential diagnosis of atypical glandular cells in Papanicolaou tests.
Xing W; Hou AY; Fischer A; Owens CL; Jiang Z
Cancer Cytopathol; 2014 Jan; 122(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 23963870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of cervical cancer screening results among 256,648 women in multiple clinical practices.
Blatt AJ; Kennedy R; Luff RD; Austin RM; Rabin DS
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 May; 123(5):282-8. PubMed ID: 25864682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Liquid-based cervical cytology.
Klinkhamer PJ; Meerding WJ; Rosier PF; Hanselaar AG
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):263-71. PubMed ID: 14579292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Glandular Lesions of the Cervix in Clinical Practice: A Cytology, Histology, and Human Papillomavirus Correlation Study From 2 Institutions.
Miller RA; Mody DR; Tams KC; Thrall MJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Nov; 139(11):1431-6. PubMed ID: 25951104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
