BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30922441)

  • 1. Robotic colorectal surgery in Australia: a cohort study examining clinical outcomes and cost.
    Wilkie B; Summers Z; Hiscock R; Wickramasinghe N; Warrier S; Smart P
    Aust Health Rev; 2019 Oct; 43(5):526-530. PubMed ID: 30922441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Understanding the Value of Both Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches Compared to the Open Approach in Colorectal Surgery.
    Hollis RH; Cannon JA; Singletary BA; Korb ML; Hawn MT; Heslin MJ
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Nov; 26(11):850-856. PubMed ID: 27398733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical outcomes and cost-benefit analysis comparing laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries.
    Vasudevan V; Reusche R; Wallace H; Kaza S
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5490-5493. PubMed ID: 27126626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Clinical and Financial Outcomes After Robotic and Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection.
    Al-Mazrou AM; Baser O; Kiran RP
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Jun; 22(6):1043-1051. PubMed ID: 29404985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery.
    Tam MS; Kaoutzanis C; Mullard AJ; Regenbogen SE; Franz MG; Hendren S; Krapohl G; Vandewarker JF; Lampman RM; Cleary RK
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Feb; 30(2):455-463. PubMed ID: 25894448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of outcome and cost between the open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgical treatments for colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis using nationwide hospital record database.
    Chiu CC; Hsu WT; Choi JJ; Galm B; Lee MG; Chang CN; Liu CC; Lee CC
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Nov; 33(11):3757-3765. PubMed ID: 30675661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score Match Analysis.
    de'Angelis N; Abdalla S; Bianchi G; Memeo R; Charpy C; Petrucciani N; Sobhani I; Brunetti F
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Nov; 28(11):1334-1345. PubMed ID: 29851362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery procedures.
    Higgins RM; Frelich MJ; Bosler ME; Gould JC
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):185-192. PubMed ID: 27139704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A national evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
    Keller DS; Delaney CP; Hashemi L; Haas EM
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4220-8. PubMed ID: 26715021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer.
    Zhu XL; Yan PJ; Yao L; Liu R; Wu DW; Du BB; Yang KH; Guo TK; Yang XF
    Surg Innov; 2019 Feb; 26(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 30191755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Colectomies Using a Large National Database: Outcomes and Trends Related to Surgery Center Volume.
    Yeo HL; Isaacs AJ; Abelson JS; Milsom JW; Sedrakyan A
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jun; 59(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 27145311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Use of Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgical Stapling Devices During Minimally Invasive Colon and Rectal Surgery: A Comparison.
    Holzmacher JL; Luka S; Aziz M; Amdur RL; Agarwal S; Obias V
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Feb; 27(2):151-155. PubMed ID: 27893300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
    Trinh BB; Hauch AT; Buell JF; Kandil E
    JSLS; 2014; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 25489211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients in terms of recovery time: a monocentric experience.
    Palomba G; Dinuzzi VP; Capuano M; Anoldo P; Milone M; De Palma GD; Aprea G
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):981-987. PubMed ID: 34743288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy.
    Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Hanna MH; Carmichael JC; Pigazzi A; Stamos MJ; Mills S
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):2792-8. PubMed ID: 26487196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Initial experiences of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, focusing on short-term outcomes: a matched case-control study.
    Sawada H; Egi H; Hattori M; Suzuki T; Shimomura M; Tanabe K; Okajima M; Ohdan H
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 13():103. PubMed ID: 25885046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prior experience in laparoscopic rectal surgery can minimise the learning curve for robotic rectal resections: a cumulative sum analysis.
    Odermatt M; Ahmed J; Panteleimonitis S; Khan J; Parvaiz A
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4067-4076. PubMed ID: 28271267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patterns-of-care and health economic analysis of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Australian public health system.
    Basto M; Sathianathen N; Te Marvelde L; Ryan S; Goad J; Lawrentschuk N; Costello AJ; Moon DA; Heriot AG; Butler J; Murphy DG
    BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):930-9. PubMed ID: 26350758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical outcomes and cost analysis of a multi-specialty robotic-assisted surgery caseload in the Australian public health system.
    Steffens D; McBride KE; Hirst N; Solomon MJ; Anderson T; Thanigasalam R; Leslie S; Karunaratne S; Bannon PG
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):2237-2245. PubMed ID: 37289337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
    Cleary RK; Mullard AJ; Ferraro J; Regenbogen SE
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1515-1524. PubMed ID: 28916895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.