158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30922526)
1. Obstetric outcomes in patients who have undergone excisional treatment for high-grade cervical squamous intra-epithelial neoplasia.
Maina G; Ribaldone R; Danese S; Lombardo V; Cavagnetto C; Plazzotta C; Surico D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 May; 236():210-213. PubMed ID: 30922526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial lesions and early invasive disease.
Kyrgiou M; Athanasiou A; Kalliala IEJ; Paraskevaidi M; Mitra A; Martin-Hirsch PP; Arbyn M; Bennett P; Paraskevaidis E
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 11(11):CD012847. PubMed ID: 29095502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery.
Sadler L; Saftlas A; Wang W; Exeter M; Whittaker J; McCowan L
JAMA; 2004 May; 291(17):2100-6. PubMed ID: 15126438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kyrgiou M; Athanasiou A; Paraskevaidi M; Mitra A; Kalliala I; Martin-Hirsch P; Arbyn M; Bennett P; Paraskevaidis E
BMJ; 2016 Jul; 354():i3633. PubMed ID: 27469988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preterm delivery and premature rupture of membranes after conization in 80 women. Preliminary data.
Patrelli TS; Anfuso S; Vandi F; Valitutto S; Migliore M; Salvati MA; De Ioris A; Condemi V; Fadda GM; Bacchi Modena A; Nardelli GB
Minerva Ginecol; 2008 Aug; 60(4):295-8. PubMed ID: 18560344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of cervical conisation on pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis.
Zhuang H; Hong S; Zheng L; Zhang L; Zhuang X; Wei H; Yang Y
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Jan; 39(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 29884103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pregnancy outcome after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Shanbhag S; Clark H; Timmaraju V; Bhattacharya S; Cruickshank M
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 114(4):727-735. PubMed ID: 19888028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pregnancy outcomes after cold knife conization related to excised cone dimensions. A retrospective cohort study.
Sozen H; Namazov A; Cakir S; Akdemir Y; Vatansever D; Karateke A
J Reprod Med; 2014; 59(1-2):81-6. PubMed ID: 24597292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical conization and the risk of preterm delivery.
Bevis KS; Biggio JR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 205(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 21345402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Case-control study of obstetrical outcomes of conisation].
Brie C; Turck M; Cheret A; Morello R; Benoist G; Dreyfus M
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Feb; 45(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 26321612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Obstetric and neonatal outcome after surgical treatment of cervical dysplasia.
Van Hentenryck M; Noel JC; Simon P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 May; 162(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 22377225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cold-knife conisation and large loop excision of transformation zone significantly increase the risk for spontaneous preterm birth: a population-based cohort study.
Jančar N; Mihevc Ponikvar B; Tomšič S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():245-9. PubMed ID: 27359080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pregnancy management after cervical surgery.
Jolley JA; Wing DA
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 20(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 18989126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical conisation and the risk of preterm delivery: a retrospective matched pair analysis of a German cohort.
Kirn V; Geiger P; Riedel C; Bergauer F; Friese K; Kainer F; Knabl J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Mar; 291(3):599-603. PubMed ID: 25234516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sequential cervical length screening in pregnancies after loop excision of the transformation zone conisation: a retrospective analysis.
Pils S; Eppel W; Seemann R; Natter C; Ott J
BJOG; 2014 Mar; 121(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 24148580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pregnancy outcome after laser surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Forsmo S; Hansen MH; Jacobsen BK; Oian P
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1996 Feb; 75(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 8604600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pregnancy outcome after cervical cone excision: a case-control study.
Sjøborg KD; Vistad I; Myhr SS; Svenningsen R; Herzog C; Kloster-Jensen A; Nygård G; Hole S; Tanbo T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 17486463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative effectiveness and risk of preterm birth of local treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and stage IA1 cervical cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Athanasiou A; Veroniki AA; Efthimiou O; Kalliala I; Naci H; Bowden S; Paraskevaidi M; Arbyn M; Lyons D; Martin-Hirsch P; Bennett P; Paraskevaidis E; Salanti G; Kyrgiou M
Lancet Oncol; 2022 Aug; 23(8):1097-1108. PubMed ID: 35835138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laser vaporization of the cervix is associated with an increased risk of preterm birth and rapid labor progression in subsequent pregnancies.
Nitahara K; Fujita Y; Tanaka D; Magarifuchi N; Taniguchi S; Shimamoto T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Oct; 304(4):895-902. PubMed ID: 33740103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pregnancy outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a single NHS hospital.
Wuntakal R; Castanon A; Sasieni PD; Hollingworth A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 May; 23(4):710-5. PubMed ID: 23446377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
