137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30923694)
1. A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Resonance Frequency Analysis of Sand Blasted Acid Etched (SAE) and Chemical Modified Sae Dental Implants.
Beena Kumary TP; Parihar AS; Mathew J; Sabu KI; Venkata SK; Babaji P
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2019; 9(1):55-59. PubMed ID: 30923694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hydrophilic modification of sandblasted and acid-etched implants improves stability during early healing: a human double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Velloso G; Moraschini V; Dos Santos Porto Barboza E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 May; 48(5):684-690. PubMed ID: 31176392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of laser-etched Ti implant surfaces vs. chemically modified SLA Ti implant surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbit tibias.
Lee JT; Cho SA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():299-307. PubMed ID: 27093590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resonance frequency analysis of dental implants placed at the posterior maxilla varying the surface treatment only: A randomized clinical trial.
Novellino MM; Sesma N; Zanardi PR; Laganá DC
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Oct; 19(5):770-775. PubMed ID: 28631408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.
Bornstein MM; Hart CN; Halbritter SA; Morton D; Buser D
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 19438966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Histomorphometric evaluation of a dual acid-etched vs. a chemically modified hydrophilic dual acid-etched implant surface. An experimental study in dogs.
de Jesus RNR; Stavropoulos A; Oliveira MTF; Soares PBF; Moura CCG; Zanetta-Barbosa D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 May; 28(5):551-557. PubMed ID: 27006317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interfacial biomechanical properties of a dual acid-etched versus a chemically modified hydrophilic dual acid-etched implant surface: an experimental study in Beagles.
de Jesus RNR; Carrilho E; Antunes PV; Ramalho A; Moura CCG; Stavropoulos A; Zanetta-Barbosa D
Int J Implant Dent; 2018 Sep; 4(1):28. PubMed ID: 30259224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Secondary stability achieved in dental implants with a calcium-coated sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) surface and a chemically modified SLA surface placed without mechanical engagement: A preclinical study.
Song YW; Paeng KW; Kim MJ; Cha JK; Jung UW; Jung RE; Thoma DS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Dec; 32(12):1474-1483. PubMed ID: 34547819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Resonance Frequency Analysis of Thermal Acid-Etched, Hydrophilic Implants During First 3 Months of Healing and Osseointegration in an Early-Loading Protocol.
van Eekeren P; Said C; Tahmaseb A; Wismeijer D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(4):843-50. PubMed ID: 26252037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stability change of chemically modified sandblasted/acid-etched titanium palatal implants. A randomized-controlled clinical trial.
Schätzle M; Männchen R; Balbach U; Hämmerle CH; Toutenburg H; Jung RE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 May; 20(5):489-95. PubMed ID: 19302392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) Measurements for Successful Osseointegration of Dental Implants During the Healing Period and Its Impact on Implant Assessed by Osstell Mentor Device.
Bafijari D; Benedetti A; Stamatoski A; Baftijari F; Susak Z; Veljanovski D
Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2019 Dec; 7(23):4110-4115. PubMed ID: 32165961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stability, marginal bone loss and survival of standard and modified sand-blasted, acid-etched implants in bilateral edentulous spaces: a prospective 15-month evaluation.
Karabuda ZC; Abdel-Haq J; Arisan V
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):840-9. PubMed ID: 21198901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of stability changes of various palatal implants.
Jayaprakash PK; Basavanna JM; Thakur RPS; Kannan S; Singh NR; Kalra H
J Family Med Prim Care; 2020 Jan; 9(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 32110569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resonance frequency analysis: Comparing two clinical instruments.
Becker W; Hujoel P; Becker BE
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 20(3):308-312. PubMed ID: 29532586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone changes around early loaded chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surfaced implants with and without a machined collar: a radiographic and resonance frequency analysis in the canine mandible.
Valderrama P; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Higginbottom F; Schoolfield JD; Jung RE; Noujeim M; Cochran DL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):548-57. PubMed ID: 20556254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Resonance frequency analysis of one-stage dental implant stability during the osseointegration period.
Ersanli S; Karabuda C; Beck F; Leblebicioglu B
J Periodontol; 2005 Jul; 76(7):1066-71. PubMed ID: 16018748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monitoring bone morphogenetic protein-2 and -7, soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand and osteoprotegerin levels in the peri-implant sulcular fluid during the osseointegration of hydrophilic-modified sandblasted acid-etched and sandblasted acid-etched surface dental implants.
Dolanmaz D; Saglam M; Inan O; Dundar N; Alniacık G; Gursoy Trak B; Kocak E; Hakki SS
J Periodontal Res; 2015 Feb; 50(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 24697526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of implant stability by means of resonance frequency analysis for flapless and conventionally inserted implants.
Katsoulis J; Avrampou M; Spycher C; Stipic M; Enkling N; Mericske-Stern R
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 14(6):915-23. PubMed ID: 21414133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the effects of different sand particles that used in dental implant roughened for osseointegration.
Yurttutan ME; Keskin A
BMC Oral Health; 2018 Mar; 18(1):47. PubMed ID: 29554893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of dental implants with different surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbits.
Koh JW; Yang JH; Han JS; Lee JB; Kim SH
J Adv Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 1(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 21165264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
