BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30923783)

  • 1. Current status of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Is it truly less invasive?
    Oshikiri T; Takiguchi G; Miura S; Takase N; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda Y; Matsuda T; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
    Ann Gastroenterol Surg; 2019 Mar; 3(2):138-145. PubMed ID: 30923783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review.
    Koyanagi K; Ozawa S; Tachimori Y
    Surg Today; 2016 Mar; 46(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 25860592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recent advances in thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Booka E; Takeuchi H; Kikuchi H; Hiramatsu Y; Kamiya K; Kawakubo H; Kitagawa Y
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2019 Jan; 12(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 30590876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Is Associated with Superior Survival Compared to Open Surgery.
    Ising MS; Smith SA; Trivedi JR; Martin RCG; Phillips P; Van Berkel V; Fox MP
    Am Surg; 2023 May; 89(5):1833-1843. PubMed ID: 35317621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review.
    Watanabe M; Baba Y; Nagai Y; Baba H
    Surg Today; 2013 Mar; 43(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 22926551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Mao T; Fang W; Gu Z; Guo X; Ji C; Chen W
    Thorac Cancer; 2015 May; 6(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 26273376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Current status of minimally invasive esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer.
    Takeuchi H; Kawakubo H; Kitagawa Y
    Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Sep; 61(9):513-21. PubMed ID: 23661109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Postoperative complications of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ozawa S; Koyanagi K; Ninomiya Y; Yatabe K; Higuchi T
    Ann Gastroenterol Surg; 2020 Mar; 4(2):126-134. PubMed ID: 32258977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer.
    Noshiro H; Iwasaki H; Kobayashi K; Uchiyama A; Miyasaka Y; Masatsugu T; Koike K; Miyazaki K
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Dec; 24(12):2965-73. PubMed ID: 20495981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy is associated with pneumonia in minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Oshikiri T; Takiguchi G; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Feb; 35(2):837-844. PubMed ID: 32086619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
    Weksler B; Sullivan JL
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Salvage minimally invasive esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer can improve postoperative complications compared with salvage open esophagectomy.
    Ishiyama K; Oguma J; Kubo K; Kanematsu K; Kurita D; Daiko H
    Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3504-3510. PubMed ID: 34642795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy.
    Levy RM; Wizorek J; Shende M; Luketich JD
    Adv Surg; 2010; 44():101-16. PubMed ID: 20919517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Lv L; Hu W; Ren Y; Wei X
    Onco Targets Ther; 2016; 9():6751-6762. PubMed ID: 27826201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
    Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transition from open to minimally invasive en bloc esophagectomy can be achieved without compromising surgical quality.
    Kammili A; Cools-Lartigue J; Mulder D; Feldman LS; Ferri LE; Mueller CL
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):3067-3076. PubMed ID: 32556773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term Survival After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Propensity-score Matched Analysis.
    Kalff MC; Fransen LFC; de Groot EM; Gisbertz SS; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Ruurda JP; Verhoeven RHA; Luyer MDP; van Hillegersberg R; van Berge Henegouwen MI;
    Ann Surg; 2022 Dec; 276(6):e749-e757. PubMed ID: 33378310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of robotic esophagectomy.
    Young A; Alvarez Gallesio JM; Sewell DB; Carr R; Molena D
    J Thorac Dis; 2021 Oct; 13(10):6163-6168. PubMed ID: 34795967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Postoperative Outcomes in a Nationwide Cohort.
    Turner KM; Delman AM; Johnson K; Patel SH; Wilson GC; Shah SA; Van Haren RM
    J Surg Res; 2023 Mar; 283():152-160. PubMed ID: 36410231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.