These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30923889)

  • 1. The Dyadic Communicative Resilience Scale (DCRS): scale development, reliability, and validity.
    Chernichky-Karcher S; Venetis MK; Lillie H
    Support Care Cancer; 2019 Dec; 27(12):4555-4564. PubMed ID: 30923889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and validity of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) Spanish Version.
    Rodríguez-Rey R; Alonso-Tapia J; Hernansaiz-Garrido H
    Psychol Assess; 2016 May; 28(5):e101-e110. PubMed ID: 26502199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "He would never let me just give up": Communicatively Constructing Dyadic Resilience in the Experience of Breast Cancer.
    Lillie HM; Venetis MK; Chernichky-Karcher SM
    Health Commun; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1516-1524. PubMed ID: 28952793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Coping and Adaptation Processing Scale-Short-Form in Cancer Patients.
    Song CE; Kim HY; So HS; Kim HK
    J Korean Acad Nurs; 2018 Jun; 48(3):375-388. PubMed ID: 29968692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale: validation study in a Portuguese sample.
    Faria Anjos J; Heitor Dos Santos MJ; Ribeiro MT; Moreira S
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e026836. PubMed ID: 31253616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and Validation of the Five-by-Five Resilience Scale.
    DeSimone JA; Harms PD; Vanhove AJ; Herian MN
    Assessment; 2017 Sep; 24(6):778-797. PubMed ID: 26773803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.
    Chiba R; Miyamoto Y; Kawakami N
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Mar; 47(3):314-22. PubMed ID: 19679304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factor structure, internal reliability, and construct validity of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS): A study on persons with serious mental illness living in the community.
    Sánchez J; Estrada-Hernández N; Booth J; Pan D
    Psychol Psychother; 2021 Sep; 94(3):620-645. PubMed ID: 33749967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the 15-item Dispositional Resilience Scale.
    Ko E; Kim HY; Bartone PT; Kang HS
    Psychol Health Med; 2018; 23(sup1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29280390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the Polish version of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS).
    Konaszewski K; Niesiobędzka M; Surzykiewicz J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0237038. PubMed ID: 32776953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between dyadic communication and body image among women with breast cancer.
    Hou TC; Tian YF; Lee KT; Wang YM; Fang SY
    Support Care Cancer; 2024 Jul; 32(8):516. PubMed ID: 39014258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychometric evaluation of the English version 14-item resilience scale (RS) in an Australian outpatient population of men with prostate cancer.
    Pascoe L; Aziz Rahman M; Edvardsson K; Jokwiro Y; McDonald E; Lood Q; Edvardsson D; Li X
    Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2018 Aug; 35():73-78. PubMed ID: 30057087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of the Resilience Scale for Adolescents in Norwegian adolescents 13-18 years.
    Moksnes UK; Haugan G
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2018 Mar; 32(1):430-440. PubMed ID: 28809052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Chinese Mental Resilience Scale and its psychometric properties.
    Sun XY; Kong LM; Zhang QJ; Tao FY; Ma AG; Liu Y; Gao YF; Tu DH; Bai XH; Su WJ; Wang LJ; Lu F; Song WD; Zhang XZ; Meng XZ; Wang YN; Xie HB; Zhou XD; Zhang LY
    J Health Psychol; 2016 Jul; 21(7):1383-93. PubMed ID: 27357924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developing and testing a measure of dyadic efficacy for married women with rheumatoid arthritis and their spouses.
    Sterba KR; DeVellis RF; Lewis MA; Baucom DH; Jordan JM; DeVellis B
    Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Mar; 57(2):294-302. PubMed ID: 17330279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dyadic coping in Latino couples: validity of the Spanish version of the Dyadic Coping Inventory.
    Falconier MK; Nussbeck F; Bodenmann G
    Anxiety Stress Coping; 2013; 26(4):447-66. PubMed ID: 22780200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What contributes to resilience in cancer patients? A principal component analysis of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale.
    Tan WS; Beatty L; Kemp E; Koczwara B
    Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2019 Oct; 15(5):e115-e119. PubMed ID: 30746847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Parental Cancer Questionnaire: scale structure, reliability, and validity.
    Levesque JV; Maybery DJ
    Support Care Cancer; 2014 Jan; 22(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 23982770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and validity testing of the physical resilience measure.
    Resnick B; Galik E; Dorsey S; Scheve A; Gutkin S
    Gerontologist; 2011 Oct; 51(5):643-52. PubMed ID: 21402647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Post-traumatic growth in advanced cancer patients receiving palliative care.
    Mystakidou K; Tsilika E; Parpa E; Galanos A; Vlahos L
    Br J Health Psychol; 2008 Nov; 13(Pt 4):633-46. PubMed ID: 17919355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.