These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30924060)

  • 21. Beyond a mask and against the bottleneck: retroactive dual-task interference during working memory consolidation of a masked visual target.
    Nieuwenstein M; Wyble B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Jun; 143(3):1409-1427. PubMed ID: 24364683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visual spatial attention to stimuli presented on the vertical and horizontal meridian: an ERP study.
    Gunter TC; Wijers AA; Jackson JL; Mulder G
    Psychophysiology; 1994 Mar; 31(2):140-53. PubMed ID: 8153250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stimulus-driven attention and cognitive control during encoding: An event related brain potentials study.
    Wills-Conn K; Schroder H; Moser J; Ravizza S
    Biol Psychol; 2019 May; 144():1-10. PubMed ID: 30858074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Memory for a single object has differently variable precisions for relevant and irrelevant features.
    Swan G; Collins J; Wyble B
    J Vis; 2016; 16(3):32. PubMed ID: 26913624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The aftermath of memory retrieval for recycling visual working memory representations.
    Park HB; Zhang W; Hyun JS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1393-1407. PubMed ID: 28378282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Competition between items in working memory leads to forgetting.
    Lewis-Peacock JA; Norman KA
    Nat Commun; 2014 Dec; 5():5768. PubMed ID: 25519874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Boosting maintenance in working memory with temporal regularities.
    Plancher G; Lévêque Y; Fanuel L; Piquandet G; Tillmann B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):812-818. PubMed ID: 29094985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Brain oscillatory 4-35 Hz EEG responses during an n-back task with complex visual stimuli.
    Palomäki J; Kivikangas M; Alafuzoff A; Hakala T; Krause CM
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 May; 516(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 22490880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. It is not in the details: Self-related shapes are rapidly classified but their features are not better remembered.
    Constable MD; Rajsic J; Welsh TN; Pratt J
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1145-1157. PubMed ID: 30927250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Guidance of visual attention from working memory contents depends on stimulus attributes.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Kong L; Huang S; Yue Z; Wang S
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Dec; 486(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 20884328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. P3 amplitude attenuation secondary to increases in target-to-target interval (TTI) during spatial serial order recall: implications for EEG models of working memory function.
    Hochberger WC; Axelrod JL; Sarapas C; Shankman SA; Kristian Hill S
    Int J Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 128(12):1135-1142. PubMed ID: 29883231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The hard fall effect: high working memory capacity leads to a higher, but less robust short-term memory performance.
    Thomassin N; Gonthier C; Guerraz M; Roulin JL
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 25384644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reward Selectively Modulates the Lingering Neural Representation of Recently Attended Objects in Natural Scenes.
    Hickey C; Peelen MV
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(31):7297-7304. PubMed ID: 28630254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Distinct contributions of attention and working memory to visual statistical learning and ensemble processing.
    Hall MG; Mattingley JB; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1112-23. PubMed ID: 26010589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The ERP old-new effect: A useful indicator in studying the effects of sleep on memory retrieval processes.
    Mograss M; Godbout R; Guillem F
    Sleep; 2006 Nov; 29(11):1491-500. PubMed ID: 17162997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Working Memory-Driven Attention in Real-World Search.
    Jung S; Yoon Y; Han SW
    Perception; 2018 Sep; 47(9):966-975. PubMed ID: 30058444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does pointing facilitate the recall of serial positions in visuospatial working memory?
    Spataro P; Marques VR; Longobardi E; Rossi-Arnaud C
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():377-81. PubMed ID: 26224261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sequential whole report accesses different states in visual working memory.
    Peters B; Rahm B; Czoschke S; Barnes C; Kaiser J; Bledowski C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):588-603. PubMed ID: 28933904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does constraining memory maintenance reduce visual search efficiency?
    Buttaccio DR; Lange ND; Thomas RP; Dougherty MR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):605-621. PubMed ID: 27967335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A bilateral advantage in controlling access to visual short-term memory.
    Holt JL; Delvenne JF
    Exp Psychol; 2014; 61(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 23988870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.