170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30924606)
1. Robot-assisted surgery for the management of apical prolapse: a bi-centre prospective cohort study.
van Zanten F; Schraffordt Koops SE; O'Sullivan OE; Lenters E; Broeders I; O'Reilly BA
BJOG; 2019 Jul; 126(8):1065-1073. PubMed ID: 30924606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy: not only for vaginal vault suspension? An observational cohort study.
van Zanten F; Lenters E; Broeders IAMJ; Schraffordt Koops SE
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):377-384. PubMed ID: 34159402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perioperative, postoperative and anatomical outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy.
Kilic GS; Lee T; Lewis K; Demirkiran C; Dursun F; Unlu BS
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 May; 41(4):651-654. PubMed ID: 33045854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sexual function after robot-assisted prolapse surgery: a prospective study.
van Zanten F; Brem C; Lenters E; Broeders IAMJ; Schraffordt Koops SE
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):905-912. PubMed ID: 29687171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot-assisted sacrohysteropexy vs robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in women with primary advanced apical prolapse: A retrospective cohort study.
Chan IS; Chen GY; Shih YC; Jiang LY; Chang YH; Wang TY; Chen YJ
J Chin Med Assoc; 2023 Apr; 86(4):418-425. PubMed ID: 36859778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robot-Assisted Sacrocolporectopexy for Multicompartment Prolapse of the Pelvic Floor: A Prospective Cohort Study Evaluating Functional and Sexual Outcome.
van Iersel JJ; de Witte CJ; Verheijen PM; Broeders IA; Lenters E; Consten EC; Schraffordt Koops SE
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Oct; 59(10):968-74. PubMed ID: 27602928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mesh Exposure After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pelvic Floor Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.
van Zanten F; van Iersel JJ; Hartog FE; Aalders KIM; Lenters E; Broeders IAMJ; Schraffordt Koops SE
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(4):636-642. PubMed ID: 29964179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
Ploumidis A; Spinoit AF; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Gan M; Ficarra V; Volpe A; Mottrie A
Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 23806518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.
Ow LL; Lim YN; Lee J; Murray C; Thomas E; Leitch A; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robot-assisted Vs Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for High-stage Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-center Study.
Illiano E; Ditonno P; Giannitsas K; De Rienzo G; Bini V; Costantini E
Urology; 2019 Dec; 134():116-123. PubMed ID: 31563536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term outcomes of modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: a 3-year prospective study.
Liang S; Zhu L; Song X; Xu T; Sun Z; Lang J
Menopause; 2016 Jul; 23(7):765-70. PubMed ID: 27138745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective evaluation of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy and sacrocervicopexy for the management of apical pelvic support defects.
Matthews CA; Carroll A; Hill A; Ramakrishnan V; Gill EJ
South Med J; 2012 May; 105(5):274-8. PubMed ID: 22561541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral sacrospinous fixation plus an anterior mesh versus abdominal sacrocervicopexy for the treatment of primary apical prolapse in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled study.
de Castro EB; Brito LGO; Juliato CRT
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):365-372. PubMed ID: 31028421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].
Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Vaginal Sacral Colpopexy: A Natural Orifice Approach to a Gold Standard Procedure.
Hanes CR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 28642090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Pan K; Cao L; Ryan NA; Wang Y; Xu H
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 26179552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
