These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30924606)

  • 21. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Pan K; Cao L; Ryan NA; Wang Y; Xu H
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 26179552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].
    Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Securing Mesh with Delayed Absorbable Suture Does Not Increase Risk of Prolapse Recurrence After Robotic Sacral Colpopexy.
    Powell CR; Tachibana I; Eckrich B; Rothenberg J; Hathaway J
    J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):944-949. PubMed ID: 32037875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
    Liang XZ; Xu LZ; Chen LQ; Wang S; Lin XT; Zhang XW
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 54(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 30893716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
    Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Short-term Outcomes of Non-robotic Single-incision Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Surgical Technique.
    Liu J; Kohn J; Wu C; Guan Z; Guan X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):721-727. PubMed ID: 31146027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prospective study of an ultra-lightweight polypropylene Y mesh for robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Salamon CG; Lewis C; Priestley J; Gurshumov E; Culligan PJ
    Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Aug; 24(8):1371-5. PubMed ID: 23296684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Anatomic Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Supracervical Hysterectomy and Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy at a Tertiary Care Institution at Initial Adaptation of the Procedure.
    Prendergast E; Silver H; Johnson LL; Simon M; Feinglass J; Kielb S; Hairston J; Lewicky-Gaupp C
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 26680565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Laparoscopic Cerclage Sacrohysteropexy: Comparing a Novel Technique for Sacrohysteropexy to Traditional Supracervical Hysterectomy and Sacrocervicopexy.
    Armstrong KL; Modest AM; Rosenblatt PL
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):e315-e320. PubMed ID: 32675629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of absorbable and permanent sutures for laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy: A randomized controlled trial.
    Tagliaferri V; Ruggieri S; Taccaliti C; Gentile C; Didonna T; D'asta M; Legge F; Guida P; Scambia G; Guido M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Feb; 100(2):347-352. PubMed ID: 32970837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Do Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Examination Ba and D Guide the Selection of Operation for Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse?
    Li C; Shu H; Dai Z
    J Invest Surg; 2020 Jun; 33(5):438-445. PubMed ID: 30574821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A review on the role of laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy.
    Rosati M; Bramante S; Conti F
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Aug; 26(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 24950123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intraoperative Complications and Perioperative and Surgical Outcomes of Single-Port Robotics-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy.
    Oh S; Yi J; Song AY; Jee J; Bae N; Shin JH
    Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Jul; 35(7):1521-1526. PubMed ID: 38900162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effectiveness of two different laparoscopic surgeries for apical support of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Li S; Ji M; Zhao Z
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():74-8. PubMed ID: 25801721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Robotic Female Pelvic Floor Reconstruction: A Review.
    Clifton MM; Pizarro-Berdichevsky J; Goldman HB
    Urology; 2016 May; 91():33-40. PubMed ID: 26723179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Postoperative complications and unanticipated healthcare encounters following mini-laparotomy vs. laparoscopic/robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparative retrospective study.
    Chill HH; Hadizadeh A; Paya-Ten C; Leffelman A; Chang C; Moss NP; Goldberg RP
    BMC Womens Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):173. PubMed ID: 38481283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: early postoperative outcomes after surgical reduction of enlarged genital hiatus.
    Bradley MS; Askew AL; Vaughan MH; Kawasaki A; Visco AG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 218(5):514.e1-514.e8. PubMed ID: 29425837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
    Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpo(recto)pexy: a cumulative sum analysis.
    van Zanten F; Schraffordt Koops SE; Pasker-De Jong PCM; Lenters E; Schreuder HWR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 221(5):483.e1-483.e11. PubMed ID: 31152711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Early safety and efficacy outcomes of a novel technique of sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of apical prolapse.
    Rajshekhar S; Mukhopadhyay S; Morris E
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Nov; 135(2):182-186. PubMed ID: 27498595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.