These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30924808)

  • 1. Sustainable treatment systems for removal of pharmaceutical residues and other priority persistent substances.
    Baresel C; Ek M; Ejhed H; Allard AS; Magnér J; Dahlgren L; Westling K; Wahlberg C; Fortkamp U; Söhr S; Harding M; Fång J; Karlsson J
    Water Sci Technol; 2019 Feb; 79(3):537-543. PubMed ID: 30924808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A review on the occurrence of micropollutants in the aquatic environment and their fate and removal during wastewater treatment.
    Luo Y; Guo W; Ngo HH; Nghiem LD; Hai FI; Zhang J; Liang S; Wang XC
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Mar; 473-474():619-41. PubMed ID: 24394371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fate of emerging and priority micropollutants during the sewage sludge treatment: Case study of Paris conurbation. Part 1: Contamination of the different types of sewage sludge.
    Mailler R; Gasperi J; Patureau D; Vulliet E; Delgenes N; Danel A; Deshayes S; Eudes V; Guerin S; Moilleron R; Chebbo G; Rocher V
    Waste Manag; 2017 Jan; 59():379-393. PubMed ID: 27847230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial distribution of pharmaceuticals in conventional wastewater treatment plant with Sludge Treatment Reed Beds technology.
    Kołecka K; Gajewska M; Stepnowski P; Caban M
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jan; 647():149-157. PubMed ID: 30077845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Occurrence of selected pharmaceuticals in wastewater treatment plants of Tuscany: An effect-based approach to evaluate the potential environmental impact.
    Palli L; Spina F; Varese GC; Vincenzi M; Aragno M; Arcangeli G; Mucci N; Santianni D; Caffaz S; Gori R
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2019 May; 222(4):717-725. PubMed ID: 31101503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of cytotoxicity following oxidative treatment of pharmaceutical residues in wastewater.
    Graumans MHF; van Hove H; Schirris T; Hoeben WFLM; van Dael MFP; Anzion RBM; Russel FGM; Scheepers PTJ
    Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 303(Pt 2):135022. PubMed ID: 35618071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monitoring micropollutants in the Swist river basin.
    Christoffels E; Brunsch A; Wunderlich-Pfeiffer J; Mertens FM
    Water Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 74(10):2280-2296. PubMed ID: 27858785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relevance of the sludge retention time (SRT) as design criteria for wastewater treatment plants for the removal of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals from wastewater.
    Kreuzinger N; Clara M; Strenn B; Kroiss H
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):149-56. PubMed ID: 15497842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of solid-liquid coefficient in the fate of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in aerobic wastewater treatment.
    Kramer RD; Filippe TC; Prado MR; de Azevedo JCR
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Sep; 25(25):25515-25525. PubMed ID: 29956261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Typical pharmaceuticals in major WWTPs in Beijing, China: Occurrence, load pattern and calculation reliability.
    Zhang Y; Wang B; Cagnetta G; Duan L; Yang J; Deng S; Huang J; Wang Y; Yu G
    Water Res; 2018 Sep; 140():291-300. PubMed ID: 29730561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Activated sludge systems removal efficiency of veterinary pharmaceuticals from slaughterhouse wastewater.
    Carvalho PN; Pirra A; Basto MC; Almeida CM
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2013 Dec; 20(12):8790-800. PubMed ID: 23740304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of advanced biological treatment and nature-based solutions for the treatment of pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs): A comprehensive study for wastewater and sewage sludge.
    Nas B; Dolu T; Argun ME; Yel E; Ateş H; Koyuncu S
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jul; 779():146344. PubMed ID: 34030227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biofiltration vs conventional activated sludge plants: what about priority and emerging pollutants removal?
    Mailler R; Gasperi J; Rocher V; Gilbert-Pawlik S; Geara-Matta D; Moilleron R; Chebbo G
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2014 Apr; 21(8):5379-90. PubMed ID: 24366825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fate of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in wastewater treatment plants--conception of a database and first results.
    Miège C; Choubert JM; Ribeiro L; Eusèbe M; Coquery M
    Environ Pollut; 2009 May; 157(5):1721-6. PubMed ID: 19201071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Removal of selected pharmaceuticals from domestic wastewater in an activated sludge system followed by a horizontal subsurface flow bed - analysis of their respective contributions.
    Verlicchi P; Galletti A; Petrovic M; Barceló D; Al Aukidy M; Zambello E
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Jun; 454-455():411-25. PubMed ID: 23563255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sources, mechanisms, and fate of steroid estrogens in wastewater treatment plants: a mini review.
    Ting YF; Praveena SM
    Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Apr; 189(4):178. PubMed ID: 28342046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment of micropollutants in municipal wastewater: ozone or powdered activated carbon?
    Margot J; Kienle C; Magnet A; Weil M; Rossi L; de Alencastro LF; Abegglen C; Thonney D; Chèvre N; Schärer M; Barry DA
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Sep; 461-462():480-98. PubMed ID: 23751332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the behaviour of selected micropollutants in a membrane bioreactor and a conventional wastewater treatment plant.
    Clara M; Strenn B; Ausserleitner M; Kreuzinger N
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):29-36. PubMed ID: 15497826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On-site evaluation of the efficiency of conventional and advanced secondary processes for the removal of 60 organic micropollutants.
    Martin Ruel S; Esperanza M; Choubert JM; Valor I; Budzinski H; Coquery M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(12):2970-8. PubMed ID: 21123929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the Possibility of Using Hydroponic Cultivations for the Removal of Pharmaceuticals and Endocrine Disrupting Compounds in Municipal Sewage Treatment Plants.
    Wolecki D; Caban M; Pazda M; Stepnowski P; Kumirska J
    Molecules; 2019 Dec; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 31906110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.