These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30925260)

  • 1. Automatic 3D reconstruction of SEM images based on Nano-robotic manipulation and epipolar plane images.
    Ding W; Zhang Y; Lu H; Wan W; Shen Y
    Ultramicroscopy; 2019 May; 200():149-159. PubMed ID: 30925260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. One-dimensional dense disparity estimation for three-dimensional reconstruction.
    Oisel L; Mémin E; Morin L; Galpin F
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2003; 12(9):1107-19. PubMed ID: 18237982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Light Field Reconstruction Using Shearlet Transform.
    Vagharshakyan S; Bregovic R; Gotchev A
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2018 Jan; 40(1):133-147. PubMed ID: 28092525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SLAM-based dense surface reconstruction in monocular Minimally Invasive Surgery and its application to Augmented Reality.
    Chen L; Tang W; John NW; Wan TR; Zhang JJ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 May; 158():135-146. PubMed ID: 29544779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Light Field Depth Estimation via Stitched Epipolar Plane Images.
    Zhou P; Shi L; Liu X; Jin J; Zhang Y; Hou J
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2023 Dec; PP():. PubMed ID: 38113148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EPI Light Field Depth Estimation Based on a Directional Relationship Model and Multiviewpoint Attention Mechanism.
    Gao M; Deng H; Xiang S; Wu J; He Z
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 22(16):. PubMed ID: 36016052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Maximum Likelihood Approach for Depth Field Estimation Based on Epipolar Plane Images.
    Neri A; Carli M; Battisti F
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Feb; 28(2):827-840. PubMed ID: 30307857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative 3D Reconstruction from Scanning Electron Microscope Images Based on Affine Camera Models.
    Töberg S; Reithmeier E
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jun; 20(12):. PubMed ID: 32604713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic Trimap Generation and Consistent Matting for Light-Field Images.
    Donghyeon Cho ; Sunyeong Kim ; Yu-Wing Tai ; In So Kweon
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2017 Aug; 39(8):1504-1517. PubMed ID: 28113357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Light Field Based on Phase Similarity.
    Feng W; Gao J; Qu T; Zhou S; Zhao D
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Nov; 21(22):. PubMed ID: 34833806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance analysis of different surface reconstruction algorithms for 3D reconstruction of outdoor objects from their digital images.
    Maiti A; Chakravarty D
    Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):932. PubMed ID: 27386376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 3D Localization for Light-Field Microscopy via Convolutional Sparse Coding on Epipolar Images.
    Song P; Jadan HV; Howe CL; Quicke P; Foust AJ; Dragotti PL
    IEEE Trans Comput Imaging; 2020; 6():1017-1032. PubMed ID: 32851121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid 3D Reconstruction for Image Sequence Acquired from UAV Camera.
    Qu Y; Huang J; Zhang X
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Jan; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 29342908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SD-SEM: sparse-dense correspondence for 3D reconstruction of microscopic samples.
    Baghaie A; Tafti AP; Owen HA; D'Souza RM; Yu Z
    Micron; 2017 Jun; 97():41-55. PubMed ID: 28343096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative analysis on volcanic ash surfaces: application of extended depth-of-field (focus) algorithm for light and scanning electron microscopy and 3D reconstruction.
    Ersoy O; Aydar E; Gourgaud A; Bayhan H
    Micron; 2008; 39(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 17208002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 3DSEM++: Adaptive and intelligent 3D SEM surface reconstruction.
    Tafti AP; Holz JD; Baghaie A; Owen HA; He MM; Yu Z
    Micron; 2016 Aug; 87():33-45. PubMed ID: 27200484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3D reconstruction of SEM images by use of optical photogrammetry software.
    Eulitz M; Reiss G
    J Struct Biol; 2015 Aug; 191(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 26073969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Epipolar Rectification with Minimum Perspective Distortion for Oblique Images.
    Liu J; Guo B; Jiang W; Gong W; Xiao X
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 Nov; 16(11):. PubMed ID: 27827991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hybrid constraint optimization for 3D subcutaneous vein reconstruction by near-infrared images.
    Wu C; Yang J; Zhu J; Cong W; Ai D; Song H; Liang X; Wang Y
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():123-133. PubMed ID: 30119847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Holographic near-eye display system based on double-convergence light Gerchberg-Saxton algorithm.
    Sun P; Chang S; Liu S; Tao X; Wang C; Zheng Z
    Opt Express; 2018 Apr; 26(8):10140-10151. PubMed ID: 29715954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.