These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30925312)
1. Voxel-based micro-finite element analysis of dental implants in a human cadaveric mandible: Tissue modulus assignment and sensitivity analyses. Mao Q; Su K; Zhou Y; Hossaini-Zadeh M; Lewis GS; Du J J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Jun; 94():229-237. PubMed ID: 30925312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of implant buccal distance on peri-implant strain: A Micro-CT based finite element analysis. Su K; Zhou Y; Hossaini-Zadeh M; Du J J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Apr; 116():104325. PubMed ID: 33485035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads]. Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental validation of a micro-CT finite element model of a human cadaveric mandible rehabilitated with short-implant-supported partial dentures. Zupancic Cepic L; Frank M; Reisinger AG; Sagl B; Pahr DH; Zechner W; Schedle A J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Feb; 126():105033. PubMed ID: 34933158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Finite element analysis of dental implant loading on atrophic and non-atrophic cancellous and cortical mandibular bone - a feasibility study. Marcián P; Borák L; Valášek J; Kaiser J; Florian Z; Wolff J J Biomech; 2014 Dec; 47(16):3830-6. PubMed ID: 25468296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Three dimensional finite element analysis of biomechanical distribution of dental implants with immediate loading]. Han XL; Liu ZW; Li YT Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 29(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 21598477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanics and strain mapping in bone as related to immediately-loaded dental implants. Du J; Lee JH; Jang AT; Gu A; Hossaini-Zadeh M; Prevost R; Curtis DA; Ho SP J Biomech; 2015 Sep; 48(12):3486-94. PubMed ID: 26162549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D full-field strain in bone-implant and bone-tooth constructs and their morphological influential factors. Zhou Y; Gong C; Hossaini-Zadeh M; Du J J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103858. PubMed ID: 32501222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trabecular bone strains around a dental implant and associated micromotions--a micro-CT-based three-dimensional finite element study. Limbert G; van Lierde C; Muraru OL; Walboomers XF; Frank M; Hansson S; Middleton J; Jaecques S J Biomech; 2010 May; 43(7):1251-61. PubMed ID: 20170921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT. González-García R; Monje F Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest. Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Souza JCM; Alves JL; López-López J; Henriques B Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Sep; 21(12):655-662. PubMed ID: 30693810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical role of peri-implant cancellous bone architecture. Matsunaga S; Shirakura Y; Ohashi T; Nakahara K; Tamatsu Y; Takano N; Ide Y Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 20617221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of implant configurations supporting three-unit fixed partial denture on mandibular bone response: biological-data-based finite element study. Yoda N; Liao Z; Chen J; Sasaki K; Swain M; Li Q J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Sep; 43(9):692-701. PubMed ID: 27224022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical response comparison in an implant overdenture retained by ball attachments on conventional regular and mini dental implants: a finite element analysis. Chang SH; Huang SR; Huang SF; Lin CL Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016; 19(8):911-21. PubMed ID: 26212887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT. Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finite element and experimental analysis to select patient's bone condition specific porous dental implant, fabricated using additive manufacturing. Chakraborty A; Datta P; Majumder S; Mondal SC; Roychowdhury A Comput Biol Med; 2020 Sep; 124():103839. PubMed ID: 32763517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of implant body designs and threaded designs of dental implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Huang HL; Chang CH; Hsu JT; Fallgatter AM; Ko CC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):551-62. PubMed ID: 17929515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants. Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiological and micro-computed tomography analysis of the bone at dental implants inserted 2, 3 and 4 mm apart in a minipig model with platform switching incorporated. Elian N; Bloom M; Dard M; Cho SC; Trushkowsky RD; Tarnow D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e22-9. PubMed ID: 23020736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]