These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30925346)

  • 1. The influence of contact force on forensic trace collection efficiency when sampling textiles with adhesive tape.
    Damsteeg-van Berkel S; Beemster F; Dankelman J; Loeve AJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 May; 298():278-283. PubMed ID: 30925346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An assessment of tape-lifts.
    Kanokwongnuwut P; Paul Kirkbride K; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102292. PubMed ID: 32248081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of tapelifting as a collection method for touch DNA.
    Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):179-86. PubMed ID: 24315606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recovery of Trace DNA on Clothing: A Comparison of Mini-tape Lifting and Three Other Forensic Evidence Collection Techniques.
    Hess S; Haas C
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jan; 62(1):187-191. PubMed ID: 27864934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DNA Recovery From Tape-Lifting Kits: Methodology and Practice.
    Zorbo S; Jeuniaux PPJMH
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):641-648. PubMed ID: 31658369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nondestructive Biological Evidence Collection with Alternative Swabs and Adhesive Lifters.
    Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):485-488. PubMed ID: 27404622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preliminary investigation of differential tapelifting for sampling forensically relevant layered deposits.
    Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2015 Nov; 17(6):553-9. PubMed ID: 26152832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-throughput DNA extraction of forensic adhesive tapes.
    Forsberg C; Jansson L; Ansell R; Hedman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Sep; 24():158-163. PubMed ID: 27448236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Touch DNA sampling with SceneSafe Fast™ minitapes.
    Stoop B; Defaux PM; Utz S; Zieger M
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2017 Nov; 29():68-71. PubMed ID: 29102833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrostatic sampling of trace DNA from clothing.
    Zieger M; Defaux PM; Utz S
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 May; 130(3):661-7. PubMed ID: 26753871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of stubbing and the double swab method for collecting offender epithelial material from a victim's skin.
    de Bruin KG; Verheij SM; Veenhoven M; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 21606013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of six adhesive tapes as tape lifts for efficient trace DNA recovery without the transfer of PCR inhibitors.
    Hymus CM; Baxter FO; Ta H; Tran T; de Sousa C; Mountford NS; Tay JW
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2024 Mar; 67():102330. PubMed ID: 37802731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Swabs as DNA collection devices for sampling different biological materials from different substrates.
    Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1080-9. PubMed ID: 24502761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Looking for the pinpoint: Optimizing identification, recovery and DNA extraction of micro traces in forensic casework.
    Dierig L; Schmidt M; Wiegand P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102191. PubMed ID: 31756628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. RNA/DNA co-analysis on aged bloodstains from adhesive tapes used for gunshot residue collection from hands.
    Grabmüller M; Schyma C; Madea B; Eichhorst T; Courts C
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2017 Jun; 13(2):161-169. PubMed ID: 28444618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery.
    Seiberle I; Währer J; Kron S; Flury K; Girardin M; Schocker A; Schulz I
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102716. PubMed ID: 35512614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of adhesive tape for recovery of DNA from crime scene items.
    Barash M; Reshef A; Brauner P
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jul; 55(4):1058-64. PubMed ID: 20456579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the recovery of fibres by tape lifts, tape scanning, and manual isolation.
    Schotman TG; van der Weerd J
    Sci Justice; 2015 Dec; 55(6):415-21. PubMed ID: 26654076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The evaluation of human hand odor volatiles on various textiles: a comparison between contact and noncontact sampling methods.
    Prada PA; Curran AM; Furton KG
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jul; 56(4):866-81. PubMed ID: 21480894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic study for DNA recovery and profiling from common IED substrates: From laboratory to casework.
    Phetpeng S; Kitpipit T; Thanakiatkrai P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():53-60. PubMed ID: 25828367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.