BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30925542)

  • 1. Comparison of the volumetric and radiomics findings of 18F-FDG PET/CT images with immunohistochemical prognostic factors in local/locally advanced breast cancer.
    Acar E; Turgut B; Yiğit S; Kaya G
    Nucl Med Commun; 2019 Jul; 40(7):764-772. PubMed ID: 30925542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Association of
    Önner H; Coskun N; Erol M; Eren Karanis Mİ
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2022; 41(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 34991831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3.
    Groheux D; Martineau A; Teixeira L; Espié M; de Cremoux P; Bertheau P; Merlet P; Lemarignier C
    Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 28057031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metabolic Tumor Burden Assessed by Dual Time Point [
    Garcia-Vicente AM; Pérez-Beteta J; Pérez-García VM; Molina D; Jiménez-Londoño GA; Soriano-Castrejón A; Martínez-González A
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2017 Aug; 19(4):636-644. PubMed ID: 27981471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinicopathological and prognostic relevance of uptake level using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT) in primary breast cancer.
    Ueda S; Tsuda H; Asakawa H; Shigekawa T; Fukatsu K; Kondo N; Yamamoto M; Hama Y; Tamura K; Ishida J; Abe Y; Mochizuki H
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2008 Apr; 38(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 18407934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the Usefulness of FDG-PET/CT for Nodal Staging of Breast Cancer.
    Orsaria P; Chiaravalloti A; Caredda E; Marchese PV; Titka B; Anemona L; Portarena I; Schillaci O; Petrella G; Palombi L; Buonomo OC
    Anticancer Res; 2018 Dec; 38(12):6639-6652. PubMed ID: 30504372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association of
    Önner H; Coskun N; Erol M; Karanis MIE
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2021 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 34305044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 18F-FDG semi-quantitative parameters and biological prognostic factors in locally advanced breast cancer.
    García Vicente AM; Soriano Castrejón A; Relea Calatayud F; Muñoz Madero V; Molina Garrido MJ; León Martín AA; Cordero García JM; Pilkington Woll JP; Chacón López-Muñiz I; Palomar Muñoz A
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2012; 31(6):308-14. PubMed ID: 23084013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Global heterogeneity assessed with
    Tello Galán MJ; García Vicente AM; Pérez Beteta J; Amo Salas M; Jiménez Londoño GA; Pena Pardo FJ; Soriano Castrejón ÁM; Pérez García VM
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2019; 38(5):290-297. PubMed ID: 31427247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
    Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
    Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 18F-FDG PET of locally invasive breast cancer and association of estrogen receptor status with standardized uptake value: microarray and immunohistochemical analysis.
    Osborne JR; Port E; Gonen M; Doane A; Yeung H; Gerald W; Cook JB; Larson S
    J Nucl Med; 2010 Apr; 51(4):543-50. PubMed ID: 20237034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma.
    Jung NY; Kim SH; Choi BB; Kim SH; Sung MS
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 13():113. PubMed ID: 25889560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Usefulness of 18F-FDG uptake with clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical prognostic factors in breast cancer.
    Kim BS; Sung SH
    Ann Nucl Med; 2012 Feb; 26(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 22139552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of biological and clinical aggressiveness of invasive ductal breast cancer using baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT-derived volumetric parameters.
    Ege Aktas G; Taştekin E; Sarikaya A
    Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jan; 39(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 29135722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semi-quantitative lymph node assessment of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in locally advanced breast cancer: correlation with biological prognostic factors.
    García Vicente AM; Soriano Castrejón A; Cruz Mora MA; González Ageitos A; Muñoz Sánchez Mdel M; León Martín A; Espinosa Aunión R; Relea Calatayud F; Muñoz Madero V; Chacón López-Muñiz I; Cordero García JM; Jiménez Londoño GA
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Jan; 40(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 23053321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do clinical, histological or immunohistochemical primary tumour characteristics translate into different (18)F-FDG PET/CT volumetric and heterogeneity features in stage II/III breast cancer?
    Groheux D; Majdoub M; Tixier F; Le Rest CC; Martineau A; Merlet P; Espié M; de Roquancourt A; Hindié E; Hatt M; Visvikis D
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(11):1682-1691. PubMed ID: 26140849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation of the value of 18F-FDG uptake, described by SUVmax, SUVavg, metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis, to clinicopathological prognostic factors and biological subtypes in breast cancer.
    Kajáry K; Tőkés T; Dank M; Kulka J; Szakáll S; Lengyel Z
    Nucl Med Commun; 2015 Jan; 36(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 25299471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tumor characteristics and metabolic quantification in carcinoma breast: An institutional experience.
    Dubey IP; Jain A; Chauhan MS; Kumar R; Agarwal S; Kishore B; Vishnoi MG; Paliwal D; John AR; Kumar N; Sharma A; Pandit AG
    Indian J Cancer; 2017; 54(1):333-339. PubMed ID: 29199717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Positron emission mammography: correlation of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and 18F-FDG.
    Wang CL; MacDonald LR; Rogers JV; Aravkin A; Haseley DR; Beatty JD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Aug; 197(2):W247-55. PubMed ID: 21785049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    Liu C; Gong C; Liu S; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Xu X; Yuan H; Wang B; Yang Z
    Oncologist; 2019 Dec; 24(12):e1277-e1285. PubMed ID: 31337657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.