968 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30927100)
21. A deep learning method for classifying mammographic breast density categories.
Mohamed AA; Berg WA; Peng H; Luo Y; Jankowitz RC; Wu S
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):314-321. PubMed ID: 29159811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Application of Deep Learning to Reduce the Rate of Malignancy Among BI-RADS 4A Breast Lesions Based on Ultrasonography.
Zhao Z; Hou S; Li S; Sheng D; Liu Q; Chang C; Chen J; Li J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2022 Nov; 48(11):2267-2275. PubMed ID: 36055860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ultrasound Elastography Combined With BI-RADS-US Classification System: Is It Helpful for the Diagnostic Performance of Conventional Ultrasonography?
Hao SY; Jiang QC; Zhong WJ; Zhao XB; Yao JY; Li LJ; Luo BM; Ou B; Zhi H
Clin Breast Cancer; 2016 Jun; 16(3):e33-41. PubMed ID: 26639065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluating different combination methods to analyse ultrasound and shear wave elastography images automatically through discriminative convolutional neural network in breast cancer imaging.
Hoffmann R; Reich C; Skerl K
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2022 Dec; 17(12):2231-2237. PubMed ID: 36018397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Using BI-RADS Stratifications as Auxiliary Information for Breast Masses Classification in Ultrasound Images.
Xing J; Chen C; Lu Q; Cai X; Yu A; Xu Y; Xia X; Sun Y; Xiao J; Huang L
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2021 Jun; 25(6):2058-2070. PubMed ID: 33119515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: integration of image modalities enhances deep learning-based breast mass classification.
Li X; Qin G; He Q; Sun L; Zeng H; He Z; Chen W; Zhen X; Zhou L
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):778-788. PubMed ID: 31691121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Computer aided classification system for breast ultrasound based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS).
Shen WC; Chang RF; Moon WK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1688-98. PubMed ID: 17681678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Differential Diagnosis of Breast Category 3 and 4 Nodules Through BI-RADS Classification in Conjunction with Shear Wave Elastography.
Wang M; Yang Z; Liu C; Yan J; Zhang W; Sun J; Cui G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 27988221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Automated pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms: Comparison of deep neural network to conventional computer vision.
Ma X; Wei J; Zhou C; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Lu Y
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2103-2114. PubMed ID: 30771257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A preliminary study to propose a diagnostic algorithm for PET/CT-detected incidental breast lesions: application of BI-RADS lexicon for US in combination with SUVmax.
Bakhshayeshkaram M; Salehi Y; Abbasi M; Hashemi Beni R; Seifi S; Hassanzad M; Jamaati HR; Aghahosseini F
Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5507-5516. PubMed ID: 30887201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Deep learning with ultrasonography: automated classification of liver fibrosis using a deep convolutional neural network.
Lee JH; Joo I; Kang TW; Paik YH; Sinn DH; Ha SY; Kim K; Choi C; Lee G; Yi J; Bang WC
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1264-1273. PubMed ID: 31478087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.
Heinig J; Witteler R; Schmitz R; Kiesel L; Steinhard J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reproducible surveillance breast ultrasound using an image fusion technique in a short-interval follow-up for BI-RADS 3 lesions: a pilot study.
Nakano S; Ando T; Tetsuka R; Fujii K; Yoshida M; Kousaka J; Shiomi-Mouri Y; Imai T; Fukutomi T; Ishiguchi T; Arai O
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1049-57. PubMed ID: 24613559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Performance of machine learning software to classify breast lesions using BI-RADS radiomic features on ultrasound images.
Fleury E; Marcomini K
Eur Radiol Exp; 2019 Aug; 3(1):34. PubMed ID: 31385114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Usefulness of combined BI-RADS analysis and Nakagami statistics of ultrasound echoes in the diagnosis of breast lesions.
Dobruch-Sobczak K; Piotrzkowska-Wróblewska H; Roszkowska-Purska K; Nowicki A; Jakubowski W
Clin Radiol; 2017 Apr; 72(4):339.e7-339.e15. PubMed ID: 28038779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of Inter-Observer Variability and Diagnostic Performance of the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound of Static versus Video Images.
Youk JH; Jung I; Yoon JH; Kim SH; Kim YM; Lee EH; Jeong SH; Kim MJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2083-8. PubMed ID: 27324292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of small breast lesions.
Du YR; Wu Y; Chen M; Gu XG
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2018; 70(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 29710688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Detection of microcalcifications in photon-counting dedicated breast-CT using a deep convolutional neural network: Proof of principle.
Landsmann A; Ruppert C; Borkowski K; Hejduk P; Ciritsis A; Wieler J; Rossi C; Boss A
Clin Imaging; 2023 Mar; 95():28-36. PubMed ID: 36603416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Two-stage CNNs for computerized BI-RADS categorization in breast ultrasound images.
Huang Y; Han L; Dou H; Luo H; Yuan Z; Liu Q; Zhang J; Yin G
Biomed Eng Online; 2019 Jan; 18(1):8. PubMed ID: 30678680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of an automated breast volume scanner according to the fifth edition of BI-RADS for breast ultrasound compared with hand-held ultrasound.
Choi EJ; Choi H; Park EH; Song JS; Youk JH
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 99():138-145. PubMed ID: 29362145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
