These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30927498)

  • 1. A multicenter randomized controlled trial using a novel collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: Outcome at prosthetic delivery and at 1-year follow-up.
    Urban IA; Wessing B; Alández N; Meloni S; González-Martin O; Polizzi G; Sanz-Sanchez I; Montero E; Zechner W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jun; 30(6):487-497. PubMed ID: 30927498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non-cross-linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure.
    Wessing B; Urban I; Montero E; Zechner W; Hof M; Alández Chamorro J; Alández Martin N; Polizzi G; Meloni S; Sanz M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):e218-e226. PubMed ID: 27990692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The L-shape technique in guided bone regeneration with simultaneous implant placement in the esthetic zone: A step-by-step protocol and a 2-14 year retrospective study.
    Zuercher AN; Mancini L; Naenni N; Thoma DS; Strauss FJ; Jung RE
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Jan; 35(1):197-205. PubMed ID: 36165402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tissue dynamics and regenerative outcome in two resorbable non-cross-linked collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration: A preclinical molecular and histological study in vivo.
    Omar O; Dahlin A; Gasser A; Dahlin C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 28703398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guided bone regeneration with and without a bone substitute at single post-extractive implants: 1-year post-loading results from a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    De Angelis N; Felice P; Pellegrino G; Camurati A; Gambino P; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(4):313-25. PubMed ID: 22282729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Esthetics and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Implants Placed with Guided Bone Regeneration and Complete Native Bone: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Jonker BP; Wolvius EB; van der Tas JT; Tahmaseb A; Pijpe J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):406-414. PubMed ID: 32142578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Stability of Augmented Bone Between Two Different Membranes Used for Guided Bone Regeneration Simultaneous with Dental Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone.
    Arunjaroensuk S; Panmekiate S; Pimkhaokham A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):206–216. PubMed ID: 29028848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of regenerated buccal bone 5 years after simultaneous implant placement and guided bone regeneration procedures--a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Jung RE; Benic GI; Scherrer D; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 24299007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of a new cross-linked collagen membrane for the treatment of peri-implant dehiscence defects: a randomised controlled double-blinded clinical trial.
    Annen BM; Ramel CF; Hämmerle CH; Jung RE
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(2):87-100. PubMed ID: 21808759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Immediate non-occlusal loading of immediate post-extractive versus delayed placement of single implants in preserved sockets of the anterior maxilla: 1-year post-loading outcome of a randomised controlled trial.
    Felice P; Pistilli R; Barausse C; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2015; 8(4):361-72. PubMed ID: 26669546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polycaprolactone versus collagen membrane and 1-year clinical outcomes: A randomized controlled trial.
    Kusirisin T; Suwanprateeb J; Buranawat B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Apr; 25(2):330-342. PubMed ID: 36519395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immediate loading of post-extractive versus delayed placed single implants in the anterior maxilla: outcome of a pragmatic multicenter randomised controlled trial 1-year after loading.
    Esposito M; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Jacotti M; Grandi G; Tuco L; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2015; 8(4):347-58. PubMed ID: 26669545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical and radiographical performance of implants placed with simultaneous guided bone regeneration using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes after 22-24 years, a prospective, controlled clinical trial.
    Jung RE; Brügger LV; Bienz SP; Hüsler J; Hämmerle CHF; Zitzmann NU
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Dec; 32(12):1455-1465. PubMed ID: 34543460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of a polyethylene glycol membrane and a collagen membrane for the treatment of bone dehiscence defects at bone level implants-A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial.
    Jung RE; Mihatovic I; Cordaro L; Windisch P; Friedmann A; Blanco Carrion J; Sanz Sanchez I; Hallman M; Quirynen M; Hammerle CHF
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Nov; 31(11):1105-1115. PubMed ID: 32875638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized controlled clinical multicenter trial comparing the clinical and histological performance of a new, modified polylactide-co-glycolide acid membrane to an expanded polytetrafluorethylene membrane in guided bone regeneration procedures.
    Schneider D; Weber FE; Grunder U; Andreoni C; Burkhardt R; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 23432666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients.
    Buser D; Halbritter S; Hart C; Bornstein MM; Grütter L; Chappuis V; Belser UC
    J Periodontol; 2009 Jan; 80(1):152-62. PubMed ID: 19228101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A 5-year cohort study on early implant placement with guided bone regeneration or alveolar ridge preservation with connective tissue graft.
    Wessels R; Vervaeke S; Seyssens L; Eghbali A; Cosyn J
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Dec; 22(6):697-705. PubMed ID: 32939989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immediate non-occlusal loading of immediate post-extractive versus delayed placement of single implants in preserved sockets of the anterior maxilla: 4-month post-loading results from a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Felice P; Soardi E; Piattelli M; Pistilli R; Jacotti M; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(4):329-44. PubMed ID: 22282730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Guided Bone Regeneration with Collagen Membranes and Particulate Graft Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Wessing B; Lettner S; Zechner W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):87–100. PubMed ID: 28938035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
    Urban IA; Jovanovic SA; Lozada JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.