107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30927959)
1. A comparison of the reproducibility of two cine-derived strain software programmes in disease states.
Graham-Brown MP; Gulsin GS; Parke K; Wormleighton J; Lai FY; Athithan L; Arnold JR; Burton JO; McCann GP; Singh AS
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():51-58. PubMed ID: 30927959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intertechnique agreement and interstudy reproducibility of strain and diastolic strain rate at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: a comparison of feature-tracking and tagging in patients with aortic stenosis.
Singh A; Steadman CD; Khan JN; Horsfield MA; Bekele S; Nazir SA; Kanagala P; Masca NG; Clarysse P; McCann GP
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Apr; 41(4):1129-37. PubMed ID: 24700404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter-study repeatability of circumferential strain and diastolic strain rate by CMR tagging, feature tracking and tissue tracking in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Nazir SA; Shetye AM; Khan JN; Singh A; Arnold JR; Squire I; McCann GP
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jun; 36(6):1133-1146. PubMed ID: 32152811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of feature tracking, fast-SENC, and myocardial tagging for global and segmental left ventricular strain.
Bucius P; Erley J; Tanacli R; Zieschang V; Giusca S; Korosoglou G; Steen H; Stehning C; Pieske B; Pieske-Kraigher E; Schuster A; Lapinskas T; Kelle S
ESC Heart Fail; 2020 Apr; 7(2):523-532. PubMed ID: 31800152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Layer-Specific Strain Is Preload Dependent: Comparison between Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature-Tracking.
Grund FF; Kristensen CB; Myhr KA; Vejlstrup N; Hassager C; Mogelvang R
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2021 Apr; 34(4):377-387. PubMed ID: 33421611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment: Are CMR feature-tracking algorithms useful in the clinical setting?
Pierpaolo P; Rolf S; Manuel BP; Davide C; Dresselaers T; Claus P; Bogaert J
Radiol Med; 2020 May; 125(5):444-450. PubMed ID: 32125636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment comparing the reproducibility of four commercially available CMR-feature tracking algorithms.
Barreiro-Pérez M; Curione D; Symons R; Claus P; Voigt JU; Bogaert J
Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5137-5147. PubMed ID: 29872912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Left ventricular mechanics assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of high-resolution speckle tracking and feature tracking.
Aurich M; Keller M; Greiner S; Steen H; Aus dem Siepen F; Riffel J; Katus HA; Buss SJ; Mereles D
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1370-1378. PubMed ID: 27013249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification of global myocardial function by cine MRI deformable registration-based analysis: Comparison with MR feature tracking and speckle-tracking echocardiography.
Lamacie MM; Thavendiranathan P; Hanneman K; Greiser A; Jolly MP; Ward R; Wintersperger BJ
Eur Radiol; 2017 Apr; 27(4):1404-1415. PubMed ID: 27491873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Global longitudinal strain and global circumferential strain by speckle-tracking echocardiography and feature-tracking cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with left ventricular ejection fraction.
Onishi T; Saha SK; Delgado-Montero A; Ludwig DR; Onishi T; Schelbert EB; Schwartzman D; Gorcsan J
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2015 May; 28(5):587-96. PubMed ID: 25577185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of multilayer cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking derived longitudinal and circumferential strain.
Ananthapadmanabhan S; Deng E; Femia G; Tang S; Koh ES; Schuster A; Puranik R; Gupta P; Nguyen T; Dimitri H; Otton J
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther; 2020 Apr; 10(2):173-182. PubMed ID: 32420097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of global longitudinal strain using standardized myocardial deformation imaging: a modality independent software approach.
Riffel JH; Keller MG; Aurich M; Sander Y; Andre F; Giusca S; Aus dem Siepen F; Seitz S; Galuschky C; Korosoglou G; Mereles D; Katus HA; Buss SJ
Clin Res Cardiol; 2015 Jul; 104(7):591-602. PubMed ID: 25643953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment.
Kido T; Hirai K; Ogawa R; Tanabe Y; Nakamura M; Kawaguchi N; Kurata A; Watanabe K; Schmidt M; Forman C; Mochizuki T; Kido T
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 Feb; 23(1):10. PubMed ID: 33618722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inter-vendor reproducibility of left and right ventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature-tracking.
Gertz RJ; Lange T; Kowallick JT; Backhaus SJ; Steinmetz M; Staab W; Kutty S; Hasenfuß G; Lotz J; Schuster A
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193746. PubMed ID: 29538467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation and Comparison of Quantitative Right Ventricular Strain Assessment by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Pulmonary Hypertension Using Feature Tracking and Deformable Registration Algorithms.
Song J; Chen Y; Cui Y; Kong X; Liu J; Cao Y; Zhou X; Wetzl J; Shi H
Acad Radiol; 2021 Oct; 28(10):e306-e313. PubMed ID: 32624401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of Global Longitudinal and Circumferential Strain Using Computed Tomography Feature Tracking: Intra-Individual Comparison with CMR Feature Tracking and Myocardial Tagging in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis.
Miskinyte E; Bucius P; Erley J; Zamani SM; Tanacli R; Stehning C; Schneeweis C; Lapinskas T; Pieske B; Falk V; Gebker R; Pedrizzetti G; Solowjowa N; Kelle S
J Clin Med; 2019 Sep; 8(9):. PubMed ID: 31509951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advanced myocardial characterization in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: feasibility of CMR-based feature tracking strain analysis in a case-control study.
Yang L; Zhang L; Cao S; Gao C; Xu H; Song T; Zhang X; Wang K
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6118-6128. PubMed ID: 32588208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multivendor comparison of global and regional 2D cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking strains vs tissue tagging at 3T.
Militaru S; Panovsky R; Hanet V; Amzulescu MS; Langet H; Pisciotti MM; Pouleur AC; Vanoverschelde JJ; Gerber BL
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 May; 23(1):54. PubMed ID: 33980259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of myocardial tagging and feature tracking in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
Schneeweis C; Lapinskas T; Schnackenburg B; Berger A; Hucko T; Kelle S; Fleck E; Gebker R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Jul; 23(4):432-40. PubMed ID: 25803969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducibility of left atrial function using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Alfuhied A; Marrow BA; Elfawal S; Gulsin GS; Graham-Brown MP; Steadman CD; Kanagala P; McCann GP; Singh A
Eur Radiol; 2021 May; 31(5):2788-2797. PubMed ID: 33128187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
