These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30928205)

  • 1. Development of a statistical shape-function model of the implanted knee for real-time prediction of joint mechanics.
    Gibbons KD; Clary CW; Rullkoetter PJ; Fitzpatrick CK
    J Biomech; 2019 May; 88():55-63. PubMed ID: 30928205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel computational workflow to holistically assess total knee arthroplasty biomechanics identifies subject-specific effects of joint mechanics on implant fixation.
    Glenday JD; Vigdorchik JM; Sculco PK; Kahlenberg CA; Mayman DJ; Debbi EM; Lipman JD; Wright TM; González FJQ
    J Biomech; 2024 Feb; 164():111973. PubMed ID: 38325192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling framework to predict in vivo mechanics of total knee arthroplasty.
    Marra MA; Vanheule V; Fluit R; Koopman BH; Rasmussen J; Verdonschot N; Andersen MS
    J Biomech Eng; 2015 Feb; 137(2):020904. PubMed ID: 25429519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of patient, surgical, and implant design variation in total knee replacement performance.
    Fitzpatrick CK; Clary CW; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2012 Aug; 45(12):2092-102. PubMed ID: 22727219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational framework for population-based evaluation of TKR-implanted patellofemoral joint mechanics.
    Ali AA; Clary CW; Smoger LM; Dennis DA; Fitzpatrick CK; Rullkoetter PJ; Laz PJ
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Aug; 19(4):1309-1317. PubMed ID: 32020408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic finite element knee simulation for evaluation of knee replacement mechanics.
    Baldwin MA; Clary CW; Fitzpatrick CK; Deacy JS; Maletsky LP; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2012 Feb; 45(3):474-83. PubMed ID: 22209313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tibiofemoral conformity variation offers changed kinematics and wear performance of customized posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.
    Koh YG; Son J; Kwon OR; Kwon SK; Kang KT
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Apr; 27(4):1213-1223. PubMed ID: 29974167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simultaneous Evaluation of Tibiofemoral and Patellofemoral Mechanics in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Combined Experimental and Computational Approach.
    Behnam YA; Anantha Krishnan A; Wilson H; Clary CW
    J Biomech Eng; 2024 Jan; 146(1):. PubMed ID: 37916893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating total knee replacement joint load ratios from kinematics.
    Fitzpatrick CK; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2014 Sep; 47(12):3003-11. PubMed ID: 25092535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flexed femoral component improves kinematics and biomechanical effect in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty.
    Kang KT; Koh YG; Son J; Kwon OR; Park KK
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Apr; 27(4):1174-1181. PubMed ID: 30094497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Kinematic alignment produces near-normal knee motion but increases contact stress after total knee arthroplasty: A case study on a single implant design.
    Ishikawa M; Kuriyama S; Ito H; Furu M; Nakamura S; Matsuda S
    Knee; 2015 Jun; 22(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 25813759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medial tilting of the joint line in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty increases contact force and stress.
    Tanaka Y; Nakamura S; Kuriyama S; Nishitani K; Ito H; Furu M; Watanabe M; Matsuda S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Mar; 53():54-59. PubMed ID: 29448081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developing simulations to reproduce in vivo fluoroscopy kinematics in total knee replacement patients.
    Fitzpatrick CK; Komistek RD; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2014 Jul; 47(10):2398-405. PubMed ID: 24845696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Verification of predicted specimen-specific natural and implanted patellofemoral kinematics during simulated deep knee bend.
    Baldwin MA; Clary C; Maletsky LP; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2341-8. PubMed ID: 19720376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computational analysis of customized cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty restoration of native knee joint biomechanics.
    Koh YG; Lee JA; Chung PK; Kang KT
    Artif Organs; 2019 May; 43(5):504-514. PubMed ID: 30375662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Knee kinematics are primarily determined by implant alignment but knee kinetics are mainly influenced by muscle coordination strategy.
    Febrer-Nafría M; Dreyer MJ; Maas A; Taylor WR; Smith CR; Hosseini Nasab SH
    J Biomech; 2023 Dec; 161():111851. PubMed ID: 37907050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of rotational prosthetic alignment variation on tibiofemoral contact pressure distribution and joint kinematics in total knee replacement.
    Xie X; Rusly R; DesJardins JD; Voss F; Chillag K; LaBerge M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2017 Nov; 231(11):1034-1047. PubMed ID: 28820012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Posterior stabilized versus cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty designs: conformity affects the performance reliability of the design over the patient population.
    Ardestani MM; Moazen M; Maniei E; Jin Z
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Apr; 37(4):350-60. PubMed ID: 25703743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Customized versus Patient-Sized Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: An In Vivo Kinematics Study Using Mobile Fluoroscopy.
    Zeller IM; Sharma A; Kurtz WB; Anderle MR; Komistek RD
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Apr; 32(4):1344-1350. PubMed ID: 27814916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contribution of geometric design parameters to knee implant performance: Conflicting impact of conformity on kinematics and contact mechanics.
    Ardestani MM; Moazen M; Jin Z
    Knee; 2015 Jun; 22(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 25795548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.