These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30928486)

  • 1. Right- versus Left-Sided Chest Ports in Oncologic Patients with a History of Right-Sided Port Removal: Are There Any Differences in the Complication Rates?
    Sun D; Kobayashi K; Samuel M; Stewart G; Skummer P
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2019 May; 30(5):726-733. PubMed ID: 30928486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Management of Port Occlusions in Adults: Different-Site Replacement versus Same-Site Salvage.
    Pabon-Ramos WM; Soyinka O; Smith TP; Ronald J; Suhocki PV; Kim CY
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2019 Jul; 30(7):1069-1074. PubMed ID: 31133452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Right or left? Side selection for a totally implantable vascular access device: a randomised observational study.
    Lin WY; Lin CP; Hsu CH; Lee YH; Lin YT; Hsu MC; Shao YY
    Br J Cancer; 2017 Sep; 117(7):932-937. PubMed ID: 28787431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complication-related removal of totally implantable venous access port systems: Does the interval between placement and first use and the neutropenia-inducing potential of chemotherapy regimens influence their incidence? A four-year prospective study of 4045 patients.
    Kakkos A; Bresson L; Hudry D; Cousin S; Lervat C; Bogart E; Meurant JP; El Bedoui S; Decanter G; Hannebicque K; Regis C; Hamdani A; Penel N; Tresch-Bruneel E; Narducci F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):689-695. PubMed ID: 27889197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of complications between peripheral arm ports and central chest ports: A meta-analysis.
    Wu S; Li W; Zhang Q; Li S; Wang L
    J Adv Nurs; 2018 Nov; 74(11):2484-2496. PubMed ID: 29917252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical Predictors of Port Infections in Adult Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.
    Zhang S; Kobayashi K; Faridnia M; Skummer P; Zhang D; Karmel MI
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1148-1155. PubMed ID: 29960670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk Factors for Early Port Infections in Adult Oncologic Patients.
    Skummer P; Kobayashi K; DeRaddo JS; Blackburn T; Schoeneck M; Patel J; Jawed M
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1427-1436. PubMed ID: 32792279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of correlations between underlying disease and port complications.
    Teichgräber U; Nagel SN; Kausche S
    Rofo; 2014 May; 186(5):496-500. PubMed ID: 24756387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of infections and complications in central venous catheters in adults with solid tumours.
    Coady K; Ali M; Sidloff D; Kenningham RR; Ahmed S
    J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 25198809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complications and Management of Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Ports in Cancer Patients at a University Hospital in Oman.
    D'Souza PC; Kumar S; Kakaria A; Al-Sukaiti R; Al-Baimani K; Hamid RS; Mittal AK; Al-Balushi M; Burney IA; Al-Moundhri MS
    Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J; 2021 Feb; 21(1):e103-e109. PubMed ID: 33777430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical outcomes of totally implantable venous access port placement via the axillary vein in patients with head and neck malignancy.
    Hong S; Seo TS; Song MG; Seol HY; Suh SI; Ryoo IS
    J Vasc Access; 2019 Mar; 20(2):134-139. PubMed ID: 29923460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Common and uncommon complications of totally implantable central venous ports: a pictorial essay.
    Perdikakis E; Kehagias E; Tsetis D
    J Vasc Access; 2012; 13(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 22307469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Severe Neutropenia at the Time of Implantable Subcutaneous Chest Port Insertion Is Not a Risk Factor for Port Removal at a Tertiary Pediatric Center.
    Hoss DR; Bedros AA; Mesipam A; Criddle J; Smith JC
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):398-402. PubMed ID: 28034702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between Arm Port and Chest Port for Optimal Vascular Access Port in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Liu Y; Li LL; Xu L; Feng DD; Cao Y; Mao XY; Zheng J; Jin F; Chen B
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():9082924. PubMed ID: 32104708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increased complication rates associated with Port-a-Cath placement in pediatric patients: location matters.
    Fallon SC; Larimer EL; Gwilliam NR; Nuchtern JG; Rodriguez JR; Lee TC; Lopez ME; Kim ES
    J Pediatr Surg; 2013 Jun; 48(6):1263-8. PubMed ID: 23845616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Infection Rates between Single-Lumen and Double-Lumen Chest Ports among Patients with Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
    She R; Kobayashi K
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2024 Apr; 35(4):592-600.e5. PubMed ID: 38128721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Venous Ports in Infants.
    Acord M; Cahill AM; Krishnamurthy G; Vatsky S; Keller M; Srinivasan A
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Apr; 29(4):492-496. PubMed ID: 29352697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Innominate vein stenosis in breast cancer patients after totally implantable venous access port placement.
    Song MG; Seo TS; Kang EY; Yong HS; Seo JH; Choi YY
    J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 25953212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative analysis of infection and complication rates between single- and double-lumen ports.
    Kozlowski KM; Jalaeian H; Travis LM; Zikria JF
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2024 Jun; 45(6):698-702. PubMed ID: 38272652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of barbed versus conventional sutures for wound closure of radiologically implanted chest ports.
    Ahmed O; Jilani D; Funaki B; Ginsburg M; Sheth S; Giger M; Zangan S
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1433-8. PubMed ID: 24912877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.