201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30928611)
1. Surgical Trends and Time Frame Comparison of Surgical Types of Hysterectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based 15-year Study.
Huang CC; Lo TS; Huang YT; Long CY; Law KS; Wu MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):65-73.e1. PubMed ID: 30928611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trends in various types of surgery for hysterectomy and distribution by patient age, surgeon age, and hospital accreditation: 10-year population-based study in Taiwan.
Wu MP; Huang KH; Long CY; Tsai EM; Tang CH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(5):612-9. PubMed ID: 20656565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hysterectomy trends for benign indications over a 15-year period in an academic teaching center in Poland: a retrospective cohort study.
Romanek-Piva K; Gałczyński K; Adamiak-Godlewska A; Futyma K; Miotła P; Rechberger T
Ginekol Pol; 2016; 87(6):411-6. PubMed ID: 27418216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inpatient Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in the United States: Trends and Factors Associated With Approach Selection.
Desai VB; Guo XM; Fan L; Wright JD; Xu X
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):151-158.e1. PubMed ID: 27614151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hysterectomy on benign indications in Sweden 1987-2003: a nationwide trend analysis.
Lundholm C; Forsgren C; Johansson AL; Cnattingius S; Altman D
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19140043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic hysterectomy trends in challenging cases (1995-2018).
Orhan A; Ozerkan K; Kasapoglu I; Ocakoglu G; Cetinkaya Demir B; Gunaydin T; Uncu G
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Dec; 48(10):791-798. PubMed ID: 31356889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hysterectomy types in Estonia are still different from the Nordic countries.
Veerus P; Lang K; Toompere K; Kirss F
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 May; 94(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 25711677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of a robotic surgical system on hysterectomy trends.
Wasson MN; Hoffman MK
Del Med J; 2015 Feb; 87(2):45-50. PubMed ID: 25876290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Primary and repeated surgeries for ectopic pregnancies and distribution by patient age, surgeon age, and hospital levels: an 11-year nationwide population-based descriptive study in Taiwan.
Hsu MI; Tang CH; Hsu PY; Huang YT; Long CY; Huang KH; Wu MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(5):598-605. PubMed ID: 22795482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Hysterectomies for benign pathology: is there a place for laparoscopic surgery?].
Anquetil C; Capella-Alouc S; Fernandez H
Contracept Fertil Sex; 1999 Apr; 27(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 10349772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences in Postoperative Morbidity among Obese Patients Undergoing Abdominal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.
Tyan P; Amdur R; Berrigan M; Robinson H; Sparks A; Gu A; Wei C; Klebanoff J; Moawad G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):464-472. PubMed ID: 30965116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of vaginal hysterectomy in Denmark: rates, indications and patient characteristics.
Nielsen SL; Daugbjerg SB; Gimbel H; Settnes A;
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Sep; 90(9):978-84. PubMed ID: 21623739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gynecologists' characteristics associated with the likelihood of performing laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy: a nationwide population-based study.
Huang CC; Wu MP; Huang YT
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Apr; 161(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 22300773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive specialists and rates of laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Loring M; Morris SN; Isaacson KB
JSLS; 2015; 19(1):e2014.00221. PubMed ID: 25848189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decreasing trend of hysterectomy in Taiwan: A population-based study, 1997-2010.
Lai JC; Huang N; Huang SM; Hu HY; Wang CW; Chou YJ; Wang KL
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 54(5):512-8. PubMed ID: 26522101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Temporal trend and nationwide utility for hysterectomies in Taiwan, 1997-2010.
Huang WY; Huang KH; Chang WC; Wu SC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 55(5):659-665. PubMed ID: 27751412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Regional and temporal variation in hysterectomy rates and surgical routes for benign diseases in the Netherlands.
Hanstede MM; Burger MJ; Timmermans A; Burger MP
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Feb; 91(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 22043840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Regional variation of hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases in Switzerland.
Stoller N; Wertli MM; Zaugg TM; Haynes AG; Chiolero A; Rodondi N; Panczak R; Aujesky D
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233082. PubMed ID: 32407404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of robotic surgery on hysterectomy trends: implications for resident education.
Yamasato K; Casey D; Kaneshiro B; Hiraoka M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 24172026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Disparities in use of laparoscopic hysterectomies: a nationwide analysis.
Patel PR; Lee J; Rodriguez AM; Borahay MA; Snyder RR; Hankins GD; Kilic GS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 24012920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
