These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30929413)

  • 1. More about the basic assumptions of t-test: normality and sample size.
    Kim TK; Park JH
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 72(4):331-335. PubMed ID: 30929413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do we need to examine the quantitative data obtained from toxicity studies for both normality and homogeneity of variance?
    Kobayashi K; Pillai KS; Sakuratani Y; Suzuki M; Jie W
    J Environ Biol; 2008 Jan; 29(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 18831330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simple and effective decision rule for choosing a significance test to protect against non-normality.
    Zimmerman DW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):388-409. PubMed ID: 21973093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preliminary testing for normality: some statistical aspects of a common concept.
    Schoder V; Himmelmann A; Wilhelm KP
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2006 Nov; 31(6):757-61. PubMed ID: 17040259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of sample non-normality on ANOVA and alternative methods.
    Lantz B
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):224-44. PubMed ID: 22624658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity and specificity of normality tests and consequences on reference interval accuracy at small sample size: a computer-simulation study.
    Le Boedec K
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2016 Dec; 45(4):648-656. PubMed ID: 27556235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.
    Brookes ST; Whitley E; Peters TJ; Mulheran PA; Egger M; Davey Smith G
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(33):1-56. PubMed ID: 11701102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. To test or not to test: Preliminary assessment of normality when comparing two independent samples.
    Rochon J; Gondan M; Kieser M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Jun; 12():81. PubMed ID: 22712852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigation Into the Effects of Using Normal Distribution Theory Methodology for Likert Scale Patient-Reported Outcome Data From Varying Underlying Distributions Including Floor/Ceiling Effects.
    DeWees TA; Mazza GL; Golafshar MA; Dueck AC
    Value Health; 2020 May; 23(5):625-631. PubMed ID: 32389228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical Power in Plant Pathology Research.
    Gent DH; Esker PD; Kriss AB
    Phytopathology; 2018 Jan; 108(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 28876210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Significance, Errors, Power, and Sample Size: The Blocking and Tackling of Statistics.
    Mascha EJ; Vetter TR
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Feb; 126(2):691-698. PubMed ID: 29346210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to ordinal scaled data as arising in randomized controlled trials.
    Sullivan LM; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1317-34. PubMed ID: 12687657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On sample size calculation for 2x2 fixed-effect ANOVA when variances are unknown and possibly unequal.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):417-25. PubMed ID: 18559139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Introduction to biostatistics: Part 4, statistical inference techniques in hypothesis testing.
    Gaddis GM; Gaddis ML
    Ann Emerg Med; 1990 Jul; 19(7):820-5. PubMed ID: 2389867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fundamentals of Research Data and Variables: The Devil Is in the Details.
    Vetter TR
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1375-1380. PubMed ID: 28787341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unadjusted Bivariate Two-Group Comparisons: When Simpler is Better.
    Vetter TR; Mascha EJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jan; 126(1):338-342. PubMed ID: 29189214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A closer look at the effect of preliminary goodness-of-fit testing for normality for the one-sample t-test.
    Rochon J; Kieser M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):410-26. PubMed ID: 21973094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of five two-sample location tests for skewed distributions with unequal variances.
    Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19577012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data.
    Mishra P; Pandey CM; Singh U; Gupta A; Sahu C; Keshri A
    Ann Card Anaesth; 2019; 22(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 30648682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Issues in biomedical statistics: comparing means under normal distribution theory.
    Ludbrook J
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1995 Apr; 65(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 7717947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.