These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30929413)

  • 21. Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils.
    Knief U; Forstmeier W
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Dec; 53(6):2576-2590. PubMed ID: 33963496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to data distorted from normality by floor effects: homogeneous regression slopes.
    Sullivan LM; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(5):477-96. PubMed ID: 8668873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of non-normality on test statistics for one-way independent groups designs.
    Cribbie RA; Fiksenbaum L; Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 21426313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Residual Normality Assumption and the Estimation of Multiple Membership Random Effects Models.
    Chen J; Leroux AJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(6):898-913. PubMed ID: 30521398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Maximum information designs.
    Lachin JM
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(5):453-64. PubMed ID: 16315649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Controlling test size while gaining the benefits of an internal pilot design.
    Coffey CS; Muller KE
    Biometrics; 2001 Jun; 57(2):625-31. PubMed ID: 11414593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Linear regression and the normality assumption.
    Schmidt AF; Finan C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jun; 98():146-151. PubMed ID: 29258908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Testing experimental data for univariate normality.
    Henderson AR
    Clin Chim Acta; 2006 Apr; 366(1-2):112-29. PubMed ID: 16388793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Some power considerations when deciding to use transformations.
    Kingman A; Zion G
    Stat Med; 1994 Mar 15-Apr 15; 13(5-7):769-83. PubMed ID: 8023049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data].
    Ivanković D; Tiljak MK
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How many do I need? Basic principles of sample size estimation.
    Devane D; Begley CM; Clarke M
    J Adv Nurs; 2004 Aug; 47(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 15238124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A more powerful test based on ratio distribution for retention noninferiority hypothesis.
    Deng L; Chen G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013 Mar; 23(2):346-60. PubMed ID: 23437943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of the Normality Assumption in Meta-Analyses.
    Wang CC; Lee WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 2020 Mar; 189(3):235-242. PubMed ID: 31781756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Analysis of small sample size studies using nonparametric bootstrap test with pooled resampling method.
    Dwivedi AK; Mallawaarachchi I; Alvarado LA
    Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2187-2205. PubMed ID: 28276584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Murine genetic models of obesity: type I error rates and the power of commonly used analyses as assessed by plasmode-based simulation.
    Ejima K; Brown AW; Smith DL; Beyaztas U; Allison DB
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2020 Jun; 44(6):1440-1449. PubMed ID: 32099106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimum sample size allocation to minimize cost or maximize power for the two-sample trimmed mean test.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18157920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. T test as a parametric statistic.
    Kim TK
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2015 Dec; 68(6):540-6. PubMed ID: 26634076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Distribution of the two-sample t-test statistic following blinded sample size re-estimation.
    Lu K
    Pharm Stat; 2016 May; 15(3):208-15. PubMed ID: 26865383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The use of bootstrap methods for estimating sample size and analysing health-related quality of life outcomes.
    Walters SJ; Campbell MJ
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(7):1075-102. PubMed ID: 15570625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Case for omitting tied observations in the two-sample t-test and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test.
    McGee M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200837. PubMed ID: 30040850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.