384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30929719)
1. Clinical approach to recurrent implantation failure: evidence-based evaluation of the endometrium.
Kliman HJ; Frankfurter D
Fertil Steril; 2019 Apr; 111(4):618-628. PubMed ID: 30929719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single and double endometrial scratching (ES) in infertile women with strict criteria of recurrent implantation failure (RIF).
Tumanyan A; Gemilyan M; Hambartsoumian E
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2019; 35(sup1):11-14. PubMed ID: 31532321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing endometrial receptivity array to histologic dating of the endometrium in women with a history of implantation failure.
Cohen AM; Ye XY; Colgan TJ; Greenblatt EM; Chan C
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2020 Dec; 66(6):347-354. PubMed ID: 32998580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Decreased MUC1 in endometrium is an independent receptivity marker in recurrent implantation failure during implantation window.
Wu F; Chen X; Liu Y; Liang B; Xu H; Li TC; Wang CC
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2018 Jun; 16(1):60. PubMed ID: 29929546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What exactly is endometrial receptivity?
Lessey BA; Young SL
Fertil Steril; 2019 Apr; 111(4):611-617. PubMed ID: 30929718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endometrial integrin expression in women with recurrent implantation failure after in vitro fertilization and its relationship to pregnancy outcome.
Coughlan C; Sinagra M; Ledger W; Li TC; Laird S
Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):825-30. PubMed ID: 23755950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Introduction: Endometrial receptivity: evaluation, induction and inhibition.
Paulson RJ
Fertil Steril; 2019 Apr; 111(4):609-610. PubMed ID: 30929717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding and improving endometrial receptivity.
Miravet-Valenciano JA; Rincon-Bertolin A; Vilella F; Simon C
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 27(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 25827647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrastructural markers of tissue endometrial receptivity in patients with recurrent implantation failure.
Melkozerova OA; Bashmakova NV; Malgina GB; Bragina EE; Michelson AA; Chistyakova GN
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2019; 35(sup1):45-48. PubMed ID: 31532318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure.
Ruiz-Alonso M; Blesa D; Díaz-Gimeno P; Gómez E; Fernández-Sánchez M; Carranza F; Carrera J; Vilella F; Pellicer A; Simón C
Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):818-24. PubMed ID: 23756099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increased endometrial placenta growth factor (PLGF) gene expression in women with successful implantation.
Santi A; Felser RS; Mueller MD; Wunder DM; McKinnon B; Bersinger NA
Fertil Steril; 2011 Sep; 96(3):663-8. PubMed ID: 21762891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing endometrial receptivity after recurrent implantation failure: a prospective controlled cohort study.
Saxtorph MH; Hallager T; Persson G; Petersen KB; Eriksen JO; Larsen LG; Hviid TV; Macklon N
Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Dec; 41(6):998-1006. PubMed ID: 32978074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Thin endometrium problem in IVF programs.
Vartanyan E; Tsaturova K; Devyatova E
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2020; 36(sup1):24-27. PubMed ID: 33305667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cytometric assessment of uterine receptivity via epithelial β3 integrin expression.
Marron K; Harrity C; Dunne H; Shkrobot L; Kennedy J
Reprod Biomed Online; 2019 Aug; 39(2):294-303. PubMed ID: 31182354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-synchronized endometrium and its correction in non-ovulatory cryopreserved embryo transfer cycles.
Gomaa H; Casper RF; Esfandiari N; Bentov Y
Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Apr; 30(4):378-84. PubMed ID: 25676169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How endometrial secretomics can help in predicting implantation.
Berlanga O; Bradshaw HB; Vilella-Mitjana F; Garrido-Gómez T; Simón C
Placenta; 2011 Sep; 32 Suppl 3():S271-5. PubMed ID: 21700334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) in patients who have failed euploid embryo transfers.
Tan J; Kan A; Hitkari J; Taylor B; Tallon N; Warraich G; Yuzpe A; Nakhuda G
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Apr; 35(4):683-692. PubMed ID: 29327111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hypothesis: Co-transfer of genuine embryos and implantation-promoting compounds via artificial containers improve endometrium receptivity.
Celik O; Acet M; Celik S; Sahin L; Koc O; Celik N
Med Hypotheses; 2017 Jun; 103():65-70. PubMed ID: 28571815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of endometrial prostanoid profiles in three infertile subgroups: the missing part of receptivity?
Demiral Keleş I; Ülgen E; Erkan MB; Çelik SE; Aydın Y; Önem AN; Kandemir H; Arslanoğlu T; Apak MR; Sezerman U; Yeh J; Buyru F; Baştu E
Fertil Steril; 2020 Mar; 113(3):670-678.e1. PubMed ID: 32061358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The prognostic value of uNK cell count and histological dating in the mid-luteal phase of women with reproductive failure.
Liu B; Mariee N; Laird S; Smith J; Li J; Li TC
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Oct; 181():171-5. PubMed ID: 25150956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
