318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30930398)
1. [Comparison of Pegfilgrastim and Filgrastim for the Primary Prophylactic Effect for Preventing Febrile Neutropenia in Patients Undergoing Rituximab with Dose-adjusted EPOCH Chemotherapy].
Kataoka T; Sakurashita H; Taogoshi T; Nishigakiuchi R; Murase T; Izumitani S; Saeki Y; Matsuo H
Yakugaku Zasshi; 2019; 139(4):629-633. PubMed ID: 30930398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of filgrastim versus pegfilgrastim on outcomes of DA-R-EPOCH for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Roder L; Konrardy K; Grauer D; Hoffmann M
Support Care Cancer; 2021 Sep; 29(9):5075-5082. PubMed ID: 33594515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Febrile neutropenia hospitalization due to pegfilgrastim on-body injector failure compared to single-injection pegfilgrastim and daily injections with reference and biosimilar filgrastim: US cost simulation for lung cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
McBride A; Krendyukov A; Mathieson N; Campbell K; Balu S; Natek M; MacDonald K; Abraham I
J Med Econ; 2020 Jan; 23(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 31433700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim during the first cycle of R-CHOP to avoid reduction of dose intensity in elderly patients.
Ise M; Matsuda K; Shimura A; Masamoto Y; Kurokawa M
Int J Hematol; 2021 Jun; 113(6):823-831. PubMed ID: 33738702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™), reference Amgen filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in febrile neutropenia primary prevention in breast cancer patients treated with neo(adjuvant) TAC: a non-interventional cohort study.
Brito M; Esteves S; André R; Isidoro M; Moreira A
Support Care Cancer; 2016 Feb; 24(2):597-603. PubMed ID: 26111956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy and safety of two pegfilgrastim biosimilars: Tripegfilgrastim and pegteograstim.
Kang KW; Lee BH; Jeon MJ; Yu ES; Kim DS; Lee SR; Sung HJ; Choi CW; Park Y; Kim BS
Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(17):6102-6110. PubMed ID: 32633471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim or pegfilgrastim-cbqv in patients with lymphoma receiving CHOP-like chemotherapy.
McBride A; Alrawashdh N; Bartels T; Moore L; Persky D; Abraham I
Future Oncol; 2021 Sep; 17(26):3485-3497. PubMed ID: 34241542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pegfilgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia following frontline bendamustine plus rituximab treatment in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a single center, real-life experience.
Cerchione C; De Renzo A; Di Perna M; Della Pepa R; Pugliese N; Catalano L; Pane F; Picardi M
Support Care Cancer; 2017 Mar; 25(3):839-845. PubMed ID: 27812763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Open-label, randomized study of pegfilgrastim vs. daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Grigg A; Solal-Celigny P; Hoskin P; Taylor K; McMillan A; Forstpointner R; Bacon P; Renwick J; Hiddemann W;
Leuk Lymphoma; 2003 Sep; 44(9):1503-8. PubMed ID: 14565651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Routine Primary Prophylaxis for Febrile Neutropenia with Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (Nivestim) or Pegfilgrastim Is Cost Effective in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients undergoing Curative-Intent R-CHOP Chemotherapy.
Wang XJ; Tang T; Farid M; Quek R; Tao M; Lim ST; Wee HL; Chan A
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148901. PubMed ID: 26871584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Villa G; Parthan A; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Somers L; Hoefkens C; Lyman GH
Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):425-438. PubMed ID: 27928760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A single-arm, retrospective analysis of the incidence of febrile neutropenia using same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim in patients with gastrointestinal cancers treated with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI.
Eckstrom J; Bartels T; Abraham I; Patel H; Elquza E; Scott AJ; Malangone S; Hollings J; McBride A
Support Care Cancer; 2019 Mar; 27(3):873-878. PubMed ID: 30090991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis and risk of infection, by chemotherapy cycle and regimen, among patients with breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Langeberg WJ; Siozon CC; Page JH; Morrow PK; Chia VM
Support Care Cancer; 2014 Aug; 22(8):2167-75. PubMed ID: 24652049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incidence and risk factors for febrile neutropenia in Japanese patients with non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma receiving R-CHOP: 2-year experience in a single center (STOP FN in NHL 2).
Yokoyama M; Kusano Y; Nishihara A; Inoue N; Nishimura N; Mishima Y; Terui Y; Nukada T; Nomura T; Hatake K
Support Care Cancer; 2020 Feb; 28(2):571-579. PubMed ID: 31093770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Community-based trial of R-CHOP and maintenance rituximab for intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma with first-cycle filgrastim for older patients.
Case DC; Desch CE; Kalman LA; Vongkovit P; Mena RR; Fridman M; Allen B
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma; 2007 Mar; 7(5):354-60. PubMed ID: 17562245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive Parameters of Febrile Neutropenia and Clinical Significance of G-CSF Receptor Signaling Pathway in the Development of Neutropenia during R-CHOP Chemotherapy with Prophylactic Pegfilgrastim in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
Kim DY; Nam J; Chung JS; Jeon BE; Lee JH; Jo JC; Kim SW; Shin HJ
Cancer Res Treat; 2022 Oct; 54(4):1256-1267. PubMed ID: 34990523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prophylactic pegfilgrastim to prevent febrile neutropenia among patients receiving biweekly (Q2W) chemotherapy regimens: a systematic review of efficacy, effectiveness and safety.
Mahtani R; Crawford J; Flannery SM; Lawrence T; Schenfeld J; Gawade PL
BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):621. PubMed ID: 34044798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis Is Effective in the Prevention of Febrile Neutropenia and Reduces Mortality in Patients Aged ≥ 75 Years with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated with R-CHOP: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Jeong SH; Kim SJ; Yoon DH; Park Y; Kang HJ; Koh Y; Lee GW; Lee WS; Yang DH; Do YR; Kim MK; Yoo KH; Choi YS; Yun HJ; Yi JH; Jo JC; Eom HS; Kwak JY; Shin HJ; Park BB; Hyun SY; Yi SY; Kwon JH; Oh SY; Kim HJ; Sohn BS; Won JH; Kim SH; Lee HS; Suh C; Kim WS
Cancer Res Treat; 2022 Oct; 54(4):1268-1277. PubMed ID: 34990525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conversion to supportive care with biosimilar pegfilgrastim-cbqv enables budget-neutral expanded access to R-CHOP treatment in non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
McBride A; MacDonald K; Abraham I
Leuk Res; 2021 Jul; 106():106591. PubMed ID: 33957339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
