These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30930462)
1. Evaluation of the cost and effectiveness of diverse recruitment methods for a genetic screening study. Milo Rasouly H; Wynn J; Marasa M; Reingold R; Chatterjee D; Kapoor S; Piva S; Kil BH; Mu X; Alvarez M; Nestor J; Mehl K; Revah-Politi A; Lippa N; Ernst ME; Bier L; Espinal A; Haser B; Sinha A; Halim I; Fasel D; Cuneo N; Thompson JJ; Verbitsky M; Cohn EG; Goldman J; Marder K; Klitzman RL; Orjuela MA; So YS; Fedotov A; Crew KD; Kiryluk K; Appelbaum PS; Weng C; Siegel K; Gharavi AG; Chung WK Genet Med; 2019 Oct; 21(10):2371-2380. PubMed ID: 30930462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of methods and costs associated with recruiting healthy women volunteers to a study of ovulation. Battistella E; Kalyan S; Prior JC J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2010 Aug; 19(8):1519-24. PubMed ID: 20626268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Practical Do-It-Yourself Recruitment Framework for Concurrent eHealth Clinical Trials: Identification of Efficient and Cost-Effective Methods for Decision Making (Part 2). Lattie EG; Kaiser SM; Alam N; Tomasino KN; Sargent E; Rubanovich CK; Palac HL; Mohr DC J Med Internet Res; 2018 Nov; 20(11):e11050. PubMed ID: 30497997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial. Deckert A; Anders S; de Allegri M; Nguyen HT; Souares A; McMahon S; Boerner K; Meurer M; Herbst K; Sand M; Koeppel L; Siems T; Brugnara L; Brenner S; Burk R; Lou D; Kirrmaier D; Duan Y; Ovchinnikova S; Marx M; Kräusslich HG; Knop M; Bärnighausen T; Denkinger C Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):39. PubMed ID: 33419461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recruiting Participants for Population Health Intervention Research: Effectiveness and Costs of Recruitment Methods for a Cohort Study. Wasfi R; Poirier Stephens Z; Sones M; Laberee K; Pugh C; Fuller D; Winters M; Kestens Y J Med Internet Res; 2021 Nov; 23(11):e21142. PubMed ID: 34587586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of electronic recruitment methods in a clinical trial of adults with gout. Miller HN; Charleston J; Wu B; Gleason K; White K; Dennison Himmelfarb CR; Ford DE; Plante TB; Gelber AC; Appel LJ; Miller ER; Juraschek SP Clin Trials; 2021 Feb; 18(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 32933342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The net effect of alternative allocation ratios on recruitment time and trial cost. Vozdolska R; Sano M; Aisen P; Edland SD Clin Trials; 2009 Apr; 6(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 19342464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reaching Adolescent Gay, Bisexual, and Queer Men Online: Development and Refinement of a National Recruitment Strategy. Prescott TL; Phillips Ii G; DuBois LZ; Bull SS; Mustanski B; Ybarra ML J Med Internet Res; 2016 Aug; 18(8):e200. PubMed ID: 27492781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost and yield considerations when expanding recruitment for genetic studies: the primary open-angle African American glaucoma genetics study. Salowe R; O'Keefe L; Merriam S; Lee R; Khachatryan N; Sankar P; Miller-Ellis E; Lehman A; Addis V; Murphy W; Henderer J; Maguire M; O'Brien J BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):101. PubMed ID: 28705151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recruitment and retention of emerging adults in lifestyle interventions: Findings from the REACH trial. LaRose JG; Reading JM; Lanoye A; Brown KL Contemp Clin Trials; 2022 Oct; 121():106904. PubMed ID: 36055582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of the effectiveness of recruitment methods: the staying well after depression randomized controlled trial. Krusche A; Rudolf von Rohr I; Muse K; Duggan D; Crane C; Williams JM Clin Trials; 2014 Apr; 11(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 24686105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Direct mailing was a successful recruitment strategy for a lung-cancer screening trial. Hinshaw LB; Jackson SA; Chen MY J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 60(8):853-7. PubMed ID: 17606183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inclusive Recruitment Strategies to Maximize Sociodemographic Diversity among Participants: A St. Louis Case Study. Carter CR; Maki J; Ackermann N; Waters EA MDM Policy Pract; 2023; 8(1):23814683231183646. PubMed ID: 37440792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Strategies and cost of recruitment of middle-aged and older unmarried women in a cancer screening study. Clark MA; Neighbors CJ; Wasserman MR; Armstrong GF; Drnach ML; Howie SL; Hawthorne TL Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2605-14. PubMed ID: 18086764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recruitment of participants for the Estrogen Replacement and Atherosclerosis (ERA) trial. a comparison of costs, yields, and participant characteristics from community- and hospital-based recruitment strategies. Folmar S; Oates-Williams F; Sharp P; Reboussin D; Smith J; Cheshire K; Macer J; Potvin Klein K; Herrington D Control Clin Trials; 2001 Feb; 22(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 11165419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Costs of recruiting couples to a clinical trial. Sadler GR; Ko CM; Malcarne VL; Banthia R; Gutierrez I; Varni JW Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jul; 28(4):423-32. PubMed ID: 17218166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effective and cost-effective clinical trial recruitment strategies for postmenopausal women in a community-based, primary care setting. Butt DA; Lock M; Harvey BJ Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Sep; 31(5):447-56. PubMed ID: 20601159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Yields and costs of recruitment methods with participant phenotypic characteristics for a diabetes prevention research study in an underrepresented pediatric population. Vander Wyst KB; Olson ML; Hooker E; Soltero EG; Konopken YP; Keller CS; Castro FG; Williams AN; Fernández ADR; Patrick DL; Ayers SL; Hu HH; Peña A; Pimentel J; Knowler WC; Shaibi GQ Trials; 2020 Aug; 21(1):716. PubMed ID: 32799920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Virtual Versus In-Person Focus Groups: Comparison of Costs, Recruitment, and Participant Logistics. Rupert DJ; Poehlman JA; Hayes JJ; Ray SE; Moultrie RR J Med Internet Res; 2017 Mar; 19(3):e80. PubMed ID: 28330832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]