161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30931399)
1. Modelling the effects of crime type and evidence on judgments about guilt.
Pearson JM; Law JR; Skene JAG; Beskind DH; Vidmar N; Ball DA; Malekpour A; Carter RM; Skene JHP
Nat Hum Behav; 2018 Nov; 2(11):856-866. PubMed ID: 30931399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Defendant stereotypicality moderates the effect of confession evidence on judgments of guilt.
Smalarz L; Madon S; Turosak A
Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):355-368. PubMed ID: 29939062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of developmental language disorder in a defendant's description on mock jurors' perceptions and judgements.
Hobson HM; Woodley J; Gamblen S; Brackely J; O'Neill F; Miles D; Westwood C
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Jan; 58(1):189-205. PubMed ID: 36087284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of proficiency testing information and error aversions on the weight given to fingerprint evidence.
Mitchell G; Garrett BL
Behav Sci Law; 2019 Mar; 37(2):195-210. PubMed ID: 30883891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders.
Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eyewitness confidence and mock juror decisions of guilt: A meta-analytic review.
Slane CR; Dodson CS
Law Hum Behav; 2022 Feb; 46(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 35073115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How jurors use and misuse character evidence.
Hunt JS; Budesheim TL
J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):347-61. PubMed ID: 15065980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An attribution theory-based content analysis of mock jurors' deliberations regarding coerced confessions.
Stevenson MC; McCracken E; Watson A; Petty T; Plogher T
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):348-366. PubMed ID: 37053386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mock-Jurors' Judgements in a Sexual Assault Case: The Influence of Defendant Race and Occupational Status, Delayed Reporting, and Multiple Allegations.
Fraser BM; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
J Interpers Violence; 2023 Jul; 38(13-14):7964-7989. PubMed ID: 36762531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Jurors use mental state information to assess breach in negligence cases.
Margoni F; Brown TR
Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105442. PubMed ID: 36996604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abuse Is Abuse: The Influence of Type of Abuse, Victim Age, and Defendant Age on Juror Decision Making.
Sheahan CL; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
J Interpers Violence; 2021 Jan; 36(1-2):938-956. PubMed ID: 29294918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can jurors be biased in their evaluation of third-party evidence within cases of rape?
Parsons A; Mojtahedi D
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 85():101837. PubMed ID: 36122514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of mitigation evidence, ethnicity, and SES on death penalty decisions by European American and Latino venire persons.
Espinoza RK; Willis-Esqueda C
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol; 2015 Apr; 21(2):288-99. PubMed ID: 25150818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of criminal defendant's history of childhood sexual abuse and personality disorder diagnosis on juror decision making.
Butler E; Jacquin K
Personal Ment Health; 2014 Aug; 8(3):188-98. PubMed ID: 24753498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Will jurors correct for evidence interdependence in their verdicts? It depends.
Pate M; Kienzle M; Vogler V
Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 30266044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "But He's a Star Football Player!": How Social Status Influences Mock Jurors' Perceptions in a Sexual Assault Case.
Pica E; Sheahan C; Pozzulo J
J Interpers Violence; 2020 Oct; 35(19-20):3963-3985. PubMed ID: 29294785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Emotional evidence and jurors' judgments: the promise of neuroscience for informing psychology and law.
Salerno JM; Bottoms BL
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(2):273-96. PubMed ID: 19319835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Arresting and convicting the innocent: the potential role of an "inappropriate" emotional display in the accused.
Heath WP
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):313-32. PubMed ID: 19385000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of sex on mock jurors' verdicts across type of child abuse cases.
Pettalia J; Pozzulo JD; Reed J
Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Jul; 69():1-9. PubMed ID: 28415027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
