210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30931820)
1. Spatial-numerical associations: Shared symbolic and non-symbolic numerical representations.
Buijsman S; Tirado C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2423-2436. PubMed ID: 30931820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-symbolic numerosities do not automatically activate spatial-numerical associations: Evidence from the SNARC effect.
Cleland AA; Corsico K; White K; Bull R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Feb; 73(2):295-308. PubMed ID: 31432745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrasting symbolic and non-symbolic numerical representations in a joint classification task.
Prpic V; Basamh YA; Goodridge CM; Agostini T; Murgia M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Aug; 30(4):1422-1430. PubMed ID: 36650364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implicit and explicit spatial-numerical representations diverge in number-form synesthetes.
Toomarian EY; Gosavi RS; Hubbard EM
Conscious Cogn; 2019 Oct; 75():102806. PubMed ID: 31518970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Number-space interactions in the human parietal cortex: Enlightening the SNARC effect with functional near-infrared spectroscopy.
Cutini S; Scarpa F; Scatturin P; Dell'Acqua R; Zorzi M
Cereb Cortex; 2014 Feb; 24(2):444-51. PubMed ID: 23081883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-symbolic magnitudes are represented spatially: Evidence from a non-symbolic SNARC task.
Nemeh F; Humberstone J; Yates MJ; Reeve RA
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0203019. PubMed ID: 30161171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatial bias in symbolic and non-symbolic numerical comparison in neglect.
Masson N; Pesenti M; Dormal V
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Aug; 51(10):1925-32. PubMed ID: 23774183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Numerals do not need numerosities: robust evidence for distinct numerical representations for symbolic and non-symbolic numbers.
Marinova M; Sasanguie D; Reynvoet B
Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):764-776. PubMed ID: 31953564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Qualitatively different coding of symbolic and nonsymbolic numbers in the human brain.
Lyons IM; Ansari D; Beilock SL
Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Feb; 36(2):475-88. PubMed ID: 25238646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial associations in numerical cognition--from single digits to arithmetic.
Fischer MH; Shaki S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(8):1461-83. PubMed ID: 25051273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-symbolic and symbolic number lines are dissociated.
He X; Guo P; Li S; Shen X; Zhou X
Cogn Process; 2021 Aug; 22(3):475-486. PubMed ID: 33751283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Numerical cognition is resilient to dramatic changes in early sensory experience.
Kanjlia S; Feigenson L; Bedny M
Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():111-120. PubMed ID: 29935427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.
Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; Doricchi F
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102887. PubMed ID: 31351325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What information is critical to elicit interference in number-form synaesthesia?
Hubbard EM; Ranzini M; Piazza M; Dehaene S
Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1200-16. PubMed ID: 19698941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SNARC for numerosities is modulated by comparative instruction (and resembles some non-numerical effects).
Patro K; Shaki S
Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 26714804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relations of different types of numerical magnitude representations to each other and to mathematics achievement.
Fazio LK; Bailey DH; Thompson CA; Siegler RS
J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Jul; 123():53-72. PubMed ID: 24699178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The knowledge of the preceding number reveals a mature understanding of the number sequence.
Sella F; Lucangeli D
Cognition; 2020 Jan; 194():104104. PubMed ID: 31698183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatial and numerical processing in children with high and low visuospatial abilities.
Crollen V; Noël MP
J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Apr; 132():84-98. PubMed ID: 25618380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial Presentations, but Not Response Formats Influence Spatial-Numerical Associations in Adults.
Fischer U; Huber S; Nuerk HC; Cress U; Moeller K
Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2608. PubMed ID: 30619009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of symbolic and non-symbolic quantity on spatial learning.
McCrink K; Galamba J
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119395. PubMed ID: 25748826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
