These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30932687)

  • 21. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography vs. mammography and MRI - clinical performance in a multi-reader evaluation.
    Fallenberg EM; Schmitzberger FF; Amer H; Ingold-Heppner B; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Engelken F; Mann RM; Renz DM; Bick U; Hamm B; Dromain C
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Jul; 27(7):2752-2764. PubMed ID: 27896471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Clinical value of suspicious calcification in the diagnosis and surgical treatment of breast lesions using contrast-enhanced spectral mammography].
    Sun XF; Xing W; Yu SN; Sha YY; Pan L; Chen Q
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jan; 100(1):42-46. PubMed ID: 31914557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Developing asymmetry identified on mammography: correlation with imaging outcome and pathologic findings.
    Leung JW; Sickles EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):667-75. PubMed ID: 17312052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical utility of dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast microcalcifications without associated mass: a preliminary analysis.
    Cheung YC; Tsai HP; Lo YF; Ueng SH; Huang PC; Chen SC
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Apr; 26(4):1082-9. PubMed ID: 26159872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography improves diagnostic accuracy in the symptomatic setting.
    Tennant SL; James JJ; Cornford EJ; Chen Y; Burrell HC; Hamilton LJ; Girio-Fragkoulakis C
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Nov; 71(11):1148-55. PubMed ID: 27296475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Adding the power of iodinated contrast media to the credibility of mammography in breast cancer diagnosis.
    Tsigginou A; Gkali C; Chalazonitis A; Feida E; Vlachos DE; Zagouri F; Rellias I; Dimitrakakis C
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 89(1067):20160397. PubMed ID: 27452266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Can Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) Reduce Benign Breast Biopsy?
    Liew ALF; Lim HMY; Fok ECM; Loke SC; Tan EY; Chong BK; Lee YS; Chan PMY; Chotai N
    Breast J; 2022; 2022():7087408. PubMed ID: 35711887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantification of enhancement in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography using a custom-made quantifier tool (I-STRIP): A proof-of-concept study.
    Lobbes MBI; Mulder HKP; Rousch M; Backes WH; Wildberger JE; Jeukens CRLPN
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():114-121. PubMed ID: 30150032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Impact of the qualitative morphology descriptors on the diagnosis of breast lesions.
    Mohamed Kamal R; Hussien Helal M; Wessam R; Mahmoud Mansour S; Godda I; Alieldin N
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jun; 84(6):1049-55. PubMed ID: 25818731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison between breast MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.
    Łuczyńska E; Heinze-Paluchowska S; Hendrick E; Dyczek S; Ryś J; Herman K; Blecharz P; Jakubowicz J
    Med Sci Monit; 2015 May; 21():1358-67. PubMed ID: 25963880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Preoperative staging by multimodal imaging in newly diagnosed breast cancer: Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography compared to conventional mammography, ultrasound, and MRI.
    Daniaux M; Gruber L; De Zordo T; Geiger-Gritsch S; Amort B; Santner W; Egle D; Baltzer PAT
    Eur J Radiol; 2023 Jun; 163():110838. PubMed ID: 37080064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in recalls from the Dutch breast cancer screening program: validation of results in a large multireader, multicase study.
    Lalji UC; Houben IP; Prevos R; Gommers S; van Goethem M; Vanwetswinkel S; Pijnappel R; Steeman R; Frotscher C; Mok W; Nelemans P; Smidt ML; Beets-Tan RG; Wildberger JE; Lobbes MB
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4371-4379. PubMed ID: 27097789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Focal Breast Pain: Does Breast Density Affect the Need for Ultrasound?
    Cho MW; Grimm LJ; Johnson KS
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 27746121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Background parenchymal enhancement on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography does not represent an influencing factor for breast cancer: A preliminary study.
    Yu L; Wang Y; Xing D; Gong P; Chen Q; Lv Y
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Dec; 99(52):e23857. PubMed ID: 33350778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Classification of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) images.
    Perek S; Kiryati N; Zimmerman-Moreno G; Sklair-Levy M; Konen E; Mayer A
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 30367322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Staging of breast cancer and the advanced applications of digital mammogram: what the physician needs to know?
    Helal MH; Mansour SM; Zaglol M; Salaleldin LA; Nada OM; Haggag MA
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160717. PubMed ID: 28055247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in patients with MRI contraindications.
    Richter V; Hatterman V; Preibsch H; Bahrs SD; Hahn M; Nikolaou K; Wiesinger B
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Jul; 59(7):798-805. PubMed ID: 29058963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Developing Asymmetry at Mammography: Correlation with US and MR Imaging and Histopathologic Findings.
    Chesebro AL; Winkler NS; Birdwell RL; Giess CS
    Radiology; 2016 May; 279(2):385-94. PubMed ID: 26583912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Choice of imaging method in the work-up of non-calcified breast lesions identified on tomosynthesis screening.
    Porembka JH; Baydoun S; Mootz AR; Xi Y; Dogan BE
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 131():109203. PubMed ID: 32771916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-field digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts.
    Mori M; Akashi-Tanaka S; Suzuki S; Daniels MI; Watanabe C; Hirose M; Nakamura S
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Jan; 24(1):104-110. PubMed ID: 26942415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.