These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30933172)

  • 1. Verbal task and motor responses (VTMR) in an adult hearing screening programme.
    Di Berardino F; Cortinovis I; Gasbarre A; Filipponi E; Milani S; Zanetti D
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2020 Feb; 40(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 30933172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. VTMR, a new speech audiometry test with verbal tasks and motor responses.
    Di Berardino F; Forti S; Cesarani A
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2012 Apr; 121(4):253-60. PubMed ID: 22606929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The use of speech audiometry in the practice of the geriatric center].
    Boboshko MY; Zhilinskaya EV; Golovanova LE; Legostaeva TV; Di Berardino F; Cesarani A
    Adv Gerontol; 2016; 29(5):795-799. PubMed ID: 28556652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficient hearing screening in noise-exposed listeners using the digit triplet test.
    Jansen S; Luts H; Dejonckere P; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 23782715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Sauer's binaural number test in noise. Significance in expertise].
    Braun T; Leisering B; Krause E; Schorn K; Hempel JM
    HNO; 2012 Oct; 60(10):886-91. PubMed ID: 22767194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using the speech understanding in noise (SUN) test for adult hearing screening1.
    Paglialonga A; Grandori F; Tognola G
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):171-4. PubMed ID: 23800813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. School-Age Hearing Screening Based on Speech-in-Noise Perception Using the Digit Triplet Test.
    Denys S; Hofmann M; Luts H; Guérin C; Keymeulen A; Van Hoeck K; van Wieringen A; Hoppenbrouwers K; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1104-1115. PubMed ID: 29557793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The performance-perceptual test and its relationship to unaided reported handicap.
    Saunders GH; Forsline A; Fausti SA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 15064656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of an internet-based speech-in-noise hearing screening test for high-frequency hearing loss: incorporating automatic conditional rescreening.
    Sheikh Rashid M; Dreschler WA
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2018 Oct; 91(7):877-885. PubMed ID: 29959525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The minimum speech test battery in profound unilateral hearing loss.
    Sargent EW; Herrmann B; Hollenbeak CS; Bankaitis AE
    Otol Neurotol; 2001 Jul; 22(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 11449104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification.
    Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):823-34. PubMed ID: 21988504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The speech audiometry test with the verbal tasks and motor responses].
    Boboshko MY; Zhilinskaya EV; Cezarani A; Berardini FD; Golovanova LE; Legostaeva TV
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2015; 80(4):47-51. PubMed ID: 26525322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fixed-Level Frequency Threshold Testing for Ototoxicity Monitoring.
    Rieke CC; Clavier OH; Allen LV; Anderson AP; Brooks CA; Fellows AM; Brungart DS; Buckey JC
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):e369-e375. PubMed ID: 28362673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Telephone screening tests for functionally impaired hearing: current use in seven countries and development of a US version.
    Watson CS; Kidd GR; Miller JD; Smits C; Humes LE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):757-67. PubMed ID: 23169193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss.
    Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Snik AF; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):835-48. PubMed ID: 21970351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Göttingen sentence in noise for different audiogram classes].
    Thiele C; Sukowksi H; Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Dec; 91(12):782-8. PubMed ID: 22234848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of a Computer-Administered Version of the Digits-in-Noise Test for Hearing Screening in the United States.
    Folmer RL; Vachhani J; McMillan GP; Watson C; Kidd GR; Feeney MP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):161-169. PubMed ID: 28240983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laboratory evaluation of an optimised internet-based speech-in-noise test for occupational high-frequency hearing loss screening: Occupational Earcheck.
    Sheikh Rashid M; Leensen MCJ; de Laat JAPM; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):844-853. PubMed ID: 28587489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Basic hearing tests.
    Dennis JM; Neely JG
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1991 Apr; 24(2):253-76. PubMed ID: 1857612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.