These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30933172)

  • 21. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
    Saunders GH; Forsline A
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The benefit method: fitting hearing aids in noise.
    Svard I; Spens KE; Back L; Ahlner BH; Barrenas ML
    Noise Health; 2005; 7(29):12-23. PubMed ID: 17478965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Smartphone hearing screening with integrated quality control and data management.
    Swanepoel de W; Myburgh HC; Howe DM; Mahomed F; Eikelboom RH
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):841-9. PubMed ID: 24998412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pure-tone and speech audiometry in patients with Menière's disease.
    Mateijsen DJ; Van Hengel PW; Van Huffelen WM; Wit HP; Albers FW
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 2001 Oct; 26(5):379-87. PubMed ID: 11678945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Evaluation of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test in background noise].
    Löhler J; Akcicek B; Pilnik M; Saager-Post K; Dazert S; Biedron S; Oeken J; Mürbe D; Löbert J; Laszig R; Wesarg T; Langer C; Plontke S; Rahne T; Machate U; Noppeney R; Schultz K; Plinkert P; Hoth S; Praetorius M; Schlattmann P; Meister EF; Pau HW; Ehrt K; Hagen R; Shehata-Dieler W; Cebulla M; Walther LE; Ernst A
    HNO; 2013 Jul; 61(7):586-91. PubMed ID: 23076435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The South African English Smartphone Digits-in-Noise Hearing Test: Effect of Age, Hearing Loss, and Speaking Competence.
    Potgieter JM; Swanepoel W; Myburgh HC; Smits C
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):656-663. PubMed ID: 29189432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Development of a computer-based automated pure tone hearing screening device: a preliminary clinical trial.
    Gan KB; Azeez D; Umat C; Ali MA; Wahab NA; Mukari SZ
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2012 Oct; 57(5):323-32. PubMed ID: 25854660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels.
    Studebaker GA; Sherbecoe RL; McDaniel DM; Gwaltney CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Apr; 105(4):2431-44. PubMed ID: 10212424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Speech-in-noise measures: variable versus fixed speech and noise levels.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 22640687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validating self-reporting of hearing-related symptoms against pure-tone audiometry, otoacoustic emission, and speech audiometry.
    Fredriksson S; Hammar O; Magnusson L; Kähäri K; Persson Waye K
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Aug; 55(8):454-62. PubMed ID: 27195802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. FreeHear: A New Sound-Field Speech-in-Babble Hearing Assessment Tool.
    Moore DR; Whiston H; Lough M; Marsden A; Dillon H; Munro KJ; Stone MA
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519872378. PubMed ID: 31599206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Comparison of the residual hearing on the profound hearing-impaired children with the hearing aids and cochlear implants].
    Luo R; Wang X; Sun C; Lan J
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 24(24):1123-5. PubMed ID: 21395181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development of Telscreen: a telephone-based speech-in-noise hearing screening test with a novel masking noise and scoring procedure.
    Dillon H; Beach EF; Seymour J; Carter L; Golding M
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Aug; 55(8):463-71. PubMed ID: 27138873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH; Cates WB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(7):548-56. PubMed ID: 19248731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Phoneme and Word Scoring in Speech-in-Noise Audiometry.
    Billings CJ; Penman TM; Ellis EM; Baltzell LS; McMillan GP
    Am J Audiol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 26989823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Speech audiometric assessment of informational masking. German version].
    Rählmann S; Meister H
    HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):228-236. PubMed ID: 28054098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Acceptable noise level: repeatability with Danish and non-semantic speech materials for adults with normal hearing.
    Olsen SØ; Nielsen LH; Lantz J; Brännström KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):557-63. PubMed ID: 22537032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.