These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30933237)

  • 1. Natural image clutter degrades overt search performance independently of set size.
    Semizer Y; Michel MM
    J Vis; 2019 Apr; 19(4):1. PubMed ID: 30933237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regional effects of clutter on human target detection performance.
    Asher MF; Tolhurst DJ; Troscianko T; Gilchrist ID
    J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 23620535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring visual clutter.
    Rosenholtz R; Li Y; Nakano L
    J Vis; 2007 Aug; 7(2):17.1-22. PubMed ID: 18217832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cutting through the clutter: searching for targets in evolving complex scenes.
    Neider MB; Zelinsky GJ
    J Vis; 2011 Dec; 11(14):. PubMed ID: 22159628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intrinsic position uncertainty impairs overt search performance.
    Semizer Y; Michel MM
    J Vis; 2017 Aug; 17(9):13. PubMed ID: 28837969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of clutter on real-world scene search: evidence from search efficiency and eye movements.
    Henderson JM; Chanceaux M; Smith TJ
    J Vis; 2009 Jan; 9(1):32.1-8. PubMed ID: 19271902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual search for traffic signs: the effects of clutter, luminance, and aging.
    Ho G; Scialfa CT; Caird JK; Graw T
    Hum Factors; 2001; 43(2):194-207. PubMed ID: 11592661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DSIM: a DisSIMilarity-based image clutter metric for targeting performance.
    Xu D; Shi Z
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Oct; 22(10):4108-22. PubMed ID: 23797260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual search for conjunctions of physical and numerical size shows that they are processed independently.
    Sobel KV; Puri AM; Faulkenberry TJ; Dague TD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):444-453. PubMed ID: 27893271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age differences in visual search for traffic signs during a simulated conversation.
    McPhee LC; Scialfa CT; Dennis WM; Ho G; Caird JK
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):674-85. PubMed ID: 15709329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring the perceptual causes of search set-size effects in complex scenes.
    Neider MB; Zelinsky GJ
    Perception; 2010; 39(6):780-94. PubMed ID: 20698473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Object co-occurrence serves as a contextual cue to guide and facilitate visual search in a natural viewing environment.
    Mack SC; Eckstein MP
    J Vis; 2011 Aug; 11(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 21856869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring search efficiency in complex visual search tasks: global and local clutter.
    Beck MR; Lohrenz MC; Trafton JG
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Sep; 16(3):238-50. PubMed ID: 20853984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Targets Need Their Own Personal Space: Effects of Clutter on Multiple-Target Search Accuracy.
    Adamo SH; Cain MS; Mitroff SR
    Perception; 2015; 44(10):1203-14. PubMed ID: 26562889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian Contrast Measures and Clutter Distribution Determinants of Human Target Detection.
    Novak A; Armstrong N; Caelli T; Blair I
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Mar; 26(3):1115-1126. PubMed ID: 28026770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Search time critically depends on irrelevant subset size in visual search.
    Benjamins JS; Hooge IT; van Elst JC; Wertheim AH; Verstraten FA
    Vision Res; 2009 Feb; 49(3):398-406. PubMed ID: 19068222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A crowding model of visual clutter.
    van den Berg R; Cornelissen FW; Roerdink JB
    J Vis; 2009 Apr; 9(4):24.1-11. PubMed ID: 19757933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A scale invariant measure of clutter.
    Bravo MJ; Farid H
    J Vis; 2008 Jan; 8(1):23.1-9. PubMed ID: 18318626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantifying peripheral and foveal perceived differences in natural image patches to predict visual search performance.
    Hughes AE; Southwell RV; Gilchrist ID; Tolhurst DJ
    J Vis; 2016 Aug; 16(10):18. PubMed ID: 27565015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling visual clutter perception using proto-object segmentation.
    Yu CP; Samaras D; Zelinsky GJ
    J Vis; 2014 Jun; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 24904121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.