BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

696 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30933433)

  • 1. Accuracy of low-dose proton CT image registration for pretreatment alignment verification in reference to planning proton CT.
    Cassetta R; Piersimoni P; Riboldi M; Giacometti V; Bashkirov V; Baroni G; Ordonez C; Coutrakon G; Schulte R
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 20(4):83-90. PubMed ID: 30933433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating CT to CBCT image registration for head and neck proton therapy as a tool for daily dose recalculation.
    Landry G; Nijhuis R; Dedes G; Handrack J; Thieke C; Janssens G; Orban de Xivry J; Reiner M; Kamp F; Wilkens JJ; Paganelli C; Riboldi M; Baroni G; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Parodi K
    Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1354-66. PubMed ID: 25735290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of a deformable image registration technique for cone beam CT-based dose verification.
    Moteabbed M; Sharp GC; Wang Y; Trofimov A; Efstathiou JA; Lu HM
    Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):196-205. PubMed ID: 25563260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantifying the accuracy of deformable image registration for cone-beam computed tomography with a physical phantom.
    Wu RY; Liu AY; Williamson TD; Yang J; Wisdom PG; Zhu XR; Frank SJ; Fuller CD; Gunn GB; Gao S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):92-100. PubMed ID: 31541526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A quantitative evaluation of deformable image registration based on MV cone beam CT images: Impact of deformation magnitudes and image modalities.
    Huang Y; Li C; Wang H; Hu Q; Wang R; Chang C; Ma W; Li W; Wu H; Zhang Y
    Phys Med; 2020 Mar; 71():82-87. PubMed ID: 32097874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the impact of extended field-of-view CT reconstructions on CT values and dosimetric accuracy for radiation therapy.
    Cheung JP; Shugard E; Mistry N; Pouliot J; Chen J
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):892-901. PubMed ID: 30457170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feasibility of CBCT-based proton dose calculation using a histogram-matching algorithm in proton beam therapy.
    Arai K; Kadoya N; Kato T; Endo H; Komori S; Abe Y; Nakamura T; Wada H; Kikuchi Y; Takai Y; Jingu K
    Phys Med; 2017 Jan; 33():68-76. PubMed ID: 27998666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of two commercial CT metal artifact reduction algorithms for use in proton radiotherapy treatment planning in the head and neck area.
    Andersson KM; Dahlgren CV; Reizenstein J; Cao Y; Ahnesjö A; Thunberg P
    Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4329-4344. PubMed ID: 30076784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phantom based evaluation of CT to CBCT image registration for proton therapy dose recalculation.
    Landry G; Dedes G; Zöllner C; Handrack J; Janssens G; Orban de Xivry J; Reiner M; Paganelli C; Riboldi M; Kamp F; Söhn M; Wilkens JJ; Baroni G; Belka C; Parodi K
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(2):595-613. PubMed ID: 25548912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fluence-modulated proton CT optimized with patient-specific dose and variance objectives for proton dose calculation.
    Dickmann J; Kamp F; Hillbrand M; Corradini S; Belka C; Schulte RW; Parodi K; Dedes G; Landry G
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):064001. PubMed ID: 33545701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Open source deformable image registration system for treatment planning and recurrence CT scans : Validation in the head and neck region.
    Zukauskaite R; Brink C; Hansen CR; Bertelsen A; Johansen J; Grau C; Eriksen JG
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2016 Aug; 192(8):545-51. PubMed ID: 27323754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
    Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the accuracy of deformable image registration on MRI with a physical phantom.
    Wu RY; Liu AY; Yang J; Williamson TD; Wisdom PG; Bronk L; Gao S; Grosshan DR; Fuller DC; Gunn GB; Ronald Zhu X; Frank SJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):166-173. PubMed ID: 31808307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the accuracy of a 3D surface imaging system for patient setup in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.
    Gopan O; Wu Q
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Oct; 84(2):547-52. PubMed ID: 22365627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative evaluation of a cone-beam computed tomography-planning computed tomography deformable image registration method for adaptive radiation therapy.
    Lawson JD; Schreibmann E; Jani AB; Fox T
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 8(4):96-113. PubMed ID: 18449149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning.
    Zhu J; Penfold SN
    Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 27277033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of beam purity and scanner complexity on proton CT accuracy.
    Piersimoni P; Ramos-Méndez J; Geoghegan T; Bashkirov VA; Schulte RW; Faddegon BA
    Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):284-298. PubMed ID: 28066887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Commissioning an in-room mobile CT for adaptive proton therapy with a compact proton system.
    Oliver JA; Zeidan O; Meeks SL; Shah AP; Pukala J; Kelly P; Ramakrishna NR; Willoughby TR
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):149-158. PubMed ID: 29682879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images.
    Hudobivnik N; Schwarz F; Johnson T; Agolli L; Dedes G; Tessonnier T; Verhaegen F; Thieke C; Belka C; Sommer WH; Parodi K; Landry G
    Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):495. PubMed ID: 26745942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative assessment of anatomical change using a virtual proton depth radiograph for adaptive head and neck proton therapy.
    Wang P; Yin L; Zhang Y; Kirk M; Song G; Ahn PH; Lin A; Gee J; Dolney D; Solberg TD; Maughan R; McDonough J; Teo BK
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):427-440. PubMed ID: 27074464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.