BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3093347)

  • 21. [Current aspects of political status of public health].
    Jaeschke B
    Gesundheitswesen; 1996 Nov; 58(11):580-2. PubMed ID: 9081494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of three stool tests for colorectal cancer screening.
    Greenwald B
    Medsurg Nurs; 2005 Oct; 14(5):292-9; quiz 300. PubMed ID: 16318108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Cost-benefit analysis of the Program for Early Screening of Cervico-uterine Cancer].
    Hernández-Peña P; Lazcano-Ponce EC; Alonso-de Ruiz P; Cruz-Valdez A; Meneses-González F; Hernández-Avila M
    Salud Publica Mex; 1997; 39(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 9381251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. CT screening: a trade-off of risks, benefits, and costs.
    Hunink MG; Gazelle GS
    J Clin Invest; 2003 Jun; 111(11):1612-9. PubMed ID: 12782661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Screening at the general pratitioner].
    Füessl HS
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2010 Oct; 152(40):34. PubMed ID: 21049639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Papanicolaou cervical smears for screening in asymptomatic women.
    Barnes BA
    Prim Care; 1981 Mar; 8(1):131-40. PubMed ID: 6911755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating validity of screening tests.
    Larson E
    Nurs Res; 1986; 35(3):186-8. PubMed ID: 3635057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Utility of mass screening programmes in health.
    Kayima JK
    East Afr Med J; 1997 Aug; 74(8):465-6. PubMed ID: 9487408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Health and economic benefits of well-designed evaluations: some lessons from evaluating neuroblastoma screening.
    Soderstrom L; Woods WG; Bernstein M; Robison LL; Tuchman M; Lemieux B
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Aug; 97(15):1118-24. PubMed ID: 16077069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The balance of harms, benefits, and costs of screening for cervical cancer in older women: the case for continued screening.
    Mandelblatt J; Lawrence W; Yi B; King J
    Arch Intern Med; 2004 Feb; 164(3):245-7; discussion 247-8. PubMed ID: 14769618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Preventive medicine: costs and responsibilities of insurance companies].
    Brunner HH
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 1998 Jan; 87(3):57-60, 62-3. PubMed ID: 9492587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Screening for colorectal cancer using faecal blood testing: varying the positive cut-off value.
    Edwards JB
    Pathology; 2005 Dec; 37(6):565-8. PubMed ID: 16373240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Screening for disease: Definitions and criteria.
    Whitby LG
    Lancet; 1974 Oct; 2(7884):819-22. PubMed ID: 4138246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Screening of infectious diseases].
    Leinikki P; Eskola J
    Duodecim; 2000; 116(8):887-92. PubMed ID: 11787132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Establishment of screening systems in East Asia.
    Naruse H
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1999; 30 Suppl 2():5-10. PubMed ID: 11400781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [A national program for the detection and treatment of diabetes mellitus].
    Zárate A; Cervantes-Rangel J; Fajardo-Ortiz G; Villalpando-Hernández S
    Gac Med Mex; 1987; 123(9-10):203-11. PubMed ID: 3133274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cancer screening--benefits, harms and making an informed choice.
    Barratt AL
    Aust Fam Physician; 2006; 35(1-2):39-42. PubMed ID: 16489385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Laboratory screening of short stature children].
    Füessl HS
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2013 Aug; 155(14):33. PubMed ID: 24006591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modelling the impact of opportunistic screening on the sequelae and public healthcare costs of infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in Australian women.
    Ward B; Rodger AJ; Jackson TJ
    Public Health; 2006 Jan; 120(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 16271271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Screening of colorectal cancer in Finland and analysis of its cost-effectiveness].
    Malila N; Anttila A; Elovainio L; Hakulinen T; Järvinen H; Paimela H; Pikkarainen P; Rautalahti M; Hakama M
    Duodecim; 2003; 119(12):1115-23. PubMed ID: 12868357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.